Gender and Civic Harmony in Erasmus’ Senatulus (The Council of Women)

IF 0.4 N/A MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES Erasmus Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1163/18749275-04302006
Reinier Leushuis
{"title":"Gender and Civic Harmony in Erasmus’ Senatulus (The Council of Women)","authors":"Reinier Leushuis","doi":"10.1163/18749275-04302006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The colloquy Senatulus ( The Council of Women , 1529) depicts a group of women assembled in imitation of the female senate conducted by the mother of the emperor Heliogabalus. While the proclaimed goal is to correct gender inequality, they spend a disproportionate amount of time on seemingly trivial procedures of speaking and on matters of dress and etiquette. The colloquy seems another example of Erasmus’ ambiguous views on women, oscillating between clichés on female inferiority and advocacy for women’s education. This essay revisits this elusive question of Erasmus and gender. First, a comparison with Erasmus’ discussion of Heliogabalus’ female senate in Lingua (1525) and a reflection on the gender-blurring figure of Heliogabalus reveal how Erasmus challenges deceptively simple gender biases (female speaking as garrulous and excessive concern with appearance and decorum). Next, I show that by exploiting the dialogical strategies of speaking together in a political or social body and by rethinking the regulation of dress and etiquette accordingly, Erasmus reframes the woman’s role in the social fabric to account for a gender diversity that benefits a well-functioning polis while avoiding excesses that threaten civic harmony.","PeriodicalId":40983,"journal":{"name":"Erasmus Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erasmus Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18749275-04302006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The colloquy Senatulus ( The Council of Women , 1529) depicts a group of women assembled in imitation of the female senate conducted by the mother of the emperor Heliogabalus. While the proclaimed goal is to correct gender inequality, they spend a disproportionate amount of time on seemingly trivial procedures of speaking and on matters of dress and etiquette. The colloquy seems another example of Erasmus’ ambiguous views on women, oscillating between clichés on female inferiority and advocacy for women’s education. This essay revisits this elusive question of Erasmus and gender. First, a comparison with Erasmus’ discussion of Heliogabalus’ female senate in Lingua (1525) and a reflection on the gender-blurring figure of Heliogabalus reveal how Erasmus challenges deceptively simple gender biases (female speaking as garrulous and excessive concern with appearance and decorum). Next, I show that by exploiting the dialogical strategies of speaking together in a political or social body and by rethinking the regulation of dress and etiquette accordingly, Erasmus reframes the woman’s role in the social fabric to account for a gender diversity that benefits a well-functioning polis while avoiding excesses that threaten civic harmony.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊拉斯谟《妇女理事会》中的性别与公民和谐
《元老院会议》(1529年)描绘了一群女性聚集在一起,模仿皇帝赫利奥加巴卢斯的母亲主持的女性元老院会议。虽然他们宣称的目标是纠正性别不平等,但他们在看似微不足道的讲话程序、着装和礼仪上花费了不成比例的时间。这次对话似乎是伊拉斯谟对女性模棱两可看法的又一个例子,在关于女性自卑的陈词滥调和倡导女性教育之间摇摆不定。这篇文章重新审视了伊拉斯谟和性别这个难以捉摸的问题。首先,通过与伊拉斯谟在《Lingua》(1525)中对Heliogabalus女性参议院的讨论的比较,以及对Heliogabalus性别模糊形象的反思,揭示了伊拉斯谟如何挑战看似简单的性别偏见(女性说话喋喋不休,过度关注外表和礼仪)。接下来,我将展示,通过利用在一个政治或社会团体中一起说话的对话策略,以及通过相应地重新思考着装和礼仪的规定,伊拉斯谟重新定义了女性在社会结构中的角色,以解释性别多样性,这有利于一个运转良好的城邦,同时避免了威胁公民和谐的过度行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Erasmus Studies
Erasmus Studies MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Praised and Maligned: Receptions of Erasmus’ Paraphrases on the New Testament Mourning an Oenophile Abbreviations Bibliography of Selected Secondary Sources on Erasmus and Gender “The Place of Speaking for a Speaking That Has No Place”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1