Factors associated with better alcohol hand rub in 2020. Results from the French national audit “Pulpe’friction”

IF 0.9 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Infection Prevention Pub Date : 2023-10-22 DOI:10.1177/17571774231208305
Mathilde Ranger, Catherine Dumartin, Raymond Nasso, Muriel Péfau, Pierre Parneix, Anne-Gaëlle Venier
{"title":"Factors associated with better alcohol hand rub in 2020. Results from the French national audit “Pulpe’friction”","authors":"Mathilde Ranger, Catherine Dumartin, Raymond Nasso, Muriel Péfau, Pierre Parneix, Anne-Gaëlle Venier","doi":"10.1177/17571774231208305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The application of alcohol-based hand rub on hands (ABHR) can prevent the transmission of microorganisms. But, in some situations the practices remain perfectible. Aim The aim of this study was to assess the self-reported ABHR practices of healthcare workers (HCWs) and to identify the factors associated with better ABHR compliance. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using the French national “Pulpe'friction” audit, from 1st January 2020 to 31st December 2020, in healthcare facilities and social welfare facilities in France. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression models. Results Of the 6769 HCWs, the average ABHR compliance was 75% “before patient contact,” 95% “before an invasive technique,” 86% “after patient contact,” and 79% “after contact with patient surroundings.” The main reported barriers were the availability, the discomfort and the harmfulness of the product. The factors significantly associated with a better compliance were the individual importance given to hand hygiene (HH); working in a healthcare facility, except in the situation “before an invasive technique”; medical profession “after patient contact”; paramedical profession “after contact with patient surroundings.” Discussion These results call for national actions to fight the most reported barriers and raise awareness on the importance of HH, especially before touching the patient.","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774231208305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The application of alcohol-based hand rub on hands (ABHR) can prevent the transmission of microorganisms. But, in some situations the practices remain perfectible. Aim The aim of this study was to assess the self-reported ABHR practices of healthcare workers (HCWs) and to identify the factors associated with better ABHR compliance. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using the French national “Pulpe'friction” audit, from 1st January 2020 to 31st December 2020, in healthcare facilities and social welfare facilities in France. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression models. Results Of the 6769 HCWs, the average ABHR compliance was 75% “before patient contact,” 95% “before an invasive technique,” 86% “after patient contact,” and 79% “after contact with patient surroundings.” The main reported barriers were the availability, the discomfort and the harmfulness of the product. The factors significantly associated with a better compliance were the individual importance given to hand hygiene (HH); working in a healthcare facility, except in the situation “before an invasive technique”; medical profession “after patient contact”; paramedical profession “after contact with patient surroundings.” Discussion These results call for national actions to fight the most reported barriers and raise awareness on the importance of HH, especially before touching the patient.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2020年酒精洗手效果更好的相关因素。法国国家审计“纸浆摩擦”结果
背景使用含酒精的免洗洗手液(ABHR)可以防止微生物的传播。但是,在某些情况下,这些做法仍然是可以完善的。目的本研究的目的是评估卫生保健工作者(HCWs)自我报告的ABHR实践,并确定与更好的ABHR依从性相关的因素。方法采用法国国家“纸浆摩擦”审计,于2020年1月1日至2020年12月31日在法国的医疗保健设施和社会福利设施进行横断面研究。数据分析采用描述性统计和多元逻辑回归模型。结果6769名卫生保健工作者的平均ABHR依从性为“接触患者前”75%,“侵入性技术前”95%,“接触患者后”86%,“接触患者环境后”79%。报告的主要障碍是产品的可获得性、不适和有害。与更好的依从性显著相关的因素是手部卫生的个人重要性(HH);在医疗机构工作,但“侵入性技术实施前”的情况除外;医疗专业“在病人接触后”;医护人员在与病人接触后这些结果呼吁各国采取行动,消除报告最多的障碍,并提高对HH重要性的认识,特别是在接触患者之前。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infection Prevention
Journal of Infection Prevention Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Infection Prevention is the professional publication of the Infection Prevention Society. The aim of the journal is to advance the evidence base in infection prevention and control, and to provide a publishing platform for all health professionals interested in this field of practice. Journal of Infection Prevention is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication containing a wide range of articles: ·Original primary research studies ·Qualitative and quantitative studies ·Reviews of the evidence on various topics ·Practice development project reports ·Guidelines for practice ·Case studies ·Overviews of infectious diseases and their causative organisms ·Audit and surveillance studies/projects
期刊最新文献
Diary. Impact of nebulization versus metered-dose inhaler utilization on viral particle dispersion in patients with COVID-19 Neonatal complications of premature rupture of membranes in mothers receiving cefotaxime and ampicillin: A randomized clinical trial A review of mask fit testing data associated with protocols utilized in evaluating the efficacy of N95 masks for health care workers Diary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1