The Negative Freedom and Politics of Modus Vivendi

Ciprian Turčan
{"title":"The Negative Freedom and Politics of Modus Vivendi","authors":"Ciprian Turčan","doi":"10.15503/jecs2023.2.93.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The aim of this study is to provide a selected theoretical-methodological analysis of the concept of negative freedom in relation to the political sphere of its application, to reveal and clarify the main political implications and normative claims that its recognition implies for political theory. Concept. From a methodological point of view, the study is based on three justified assumptions: (1) that in modern political philosophy the idea of individual freedom is the main normative basis for political theories, (2) that philosophical development has brought several competing concepts of this idea and (3) that from its own content the concept implies basic requirements for its social and political application. For the purposes of theoretical-methodological analysis, we distinguished two different moments in the concept of individual freedom (freedom as a question of will and freedom as a question of practice) and from their point of view we examined the selected concept of negative freedom in an attempt to reveal its implicit claims at the political level. Results. In the article, we have succeeded in formulating and arguing for the thesis that the concept of negative freedom in its applicability programmatically leads to a modus vivendi model of politics. We have shown that the concept of freedom and the model of politics are interrelated and normatively interdependent. Conclusion. The main conclusion of the study is that the above model of politics cannot be generalised and considered equally acceptable for all conceptions of freedom and the good life.","PeriodicalId":256704,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2023.2.93.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this study is to provide a selected theoretical-methodological analysis of the concept of negative freedom in relation to the political sphere of its application, to reveal and clarify the main political implications and normative claims that its recognition implies for political theory. Concept. From a methodological point of view, the study is based on three justified assumptions: (1) that in modern political philosophy the idea of individual freedom is the main normative basis for political theories, (2) that philosophical development has brought several competing concepts of this idea and (3) that from its own content the concept implies basic requirements for its social and political application. For the purposes of theoretical-methodological analysis, we distinguished two different moments in the concept of individual freedom (freedom as a question of will and freedom as a question of practice) and from their point of view we examined the selected concept of negative freedom in an attempt to reveal its implicit claims at the political level. Results. In the article, we have succeeded in formulating and arguing for the thesis that the concept of negative freedom in its applicability programmatically leads to a modus vivendi model of politics. We have shown that the concept of freedom and the model of politics are interrelated and normatively interdependent. Conclusion. The main conclusion of the study is that the above model of politics cannot be generalised and considered equally acceptable for all conceptions of freedom and the good life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权宜之计的消极自由与政治
的目标。本研究的目的是对消极自由概念与其应用的政治领域的关系提供一个精选的理论-方法分析,揭示和澄清其承认对政治理论意味着的主要政治含义和规范主张。的概念。从方法论的角度来看,这项研究基于三个合理的假设:(1)在现代政治哲学中,个人自由的观念是政治理论的主要规范基础;(2)哲学的发展为这一观念带来了几个相互竞争的概念;(3)从其本身的内容来看,这一概念隐含了其社会和政治应用的基本要求。为了理论方法分析的目的,我们区分了个人自由概念中的两个不同时刻(作为意志问题的自由和作为实践问题的自由),并从他们的角度考察了选择的消极自由概念,试图揭示其在政治层面上的隐含要求。结果。在这篇文章中,我们成功地阐述并论证了消极自由的概念在其适用性上程序化地导致了一种权宜之计的政治模式。我们已经表明,自由的概念和政治模式是相互关联的,在规范上是相互依存的。结论。该研究的主要结论是,上述政治模式不能一概而论,也不能被认为对所有自由和美好生活的概念都同样可以接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using AI Chatbot for Math Tutoring The Role of Digital Technologies in Building Research Competencies of Future Doctors of Philosophy Ecopedagogy: Biology Learning Profile Of High School In Pulau Timor The Geometrical Patterns and Philosophical Value of Javanese Traditional Mosque Architecture for Mathematics Learning in Primary School: An Ethnomathematic Study Role of Saudi Universities in Spreading the Culture of Social Responsibility Based on the Experiences of Malaysian and Canadian Universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1