Safeguarding Its Way to Security or Not – Should Fintech Become a Bank(Tech)?

Kamila Pawlak
{"title":"Safeguarding Its Way to Security or Not – Should Fintech Become a Bank(Tech)?","authors":"Kamila Pawlak","doi":"10.18778/2391-6478.3.39.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article. This article explores the trend of fintech firms obtaining banking licenses, challenging their traditional advantage of not being banking institutions. It investigates two hypotheses:
 H1 – Banking licenses bring more opportunities than threats for fintech companies;H2 – Obtaining licenses positively impacts their profitability.
 Methodology. The study utilizes the literature review and applies Porter’s Five Forces methodology to assess the strategic implications of banking licenses for fintech firms. Financial analysis is conducted on three selected companies based on market capitalization, banking license timeline, and geographical diversification. Profitability ratios (ROE and ROA) are analyzed before and after obtaining the license.
 Results of the research. Fintech firms with banking licenses experience more opportunities than threats, as confirmed by Porter’s analysis. However, only one out of three analysed companies immediately improved profitability ratios after obtaining the license. In conclusion, obtaining banking licenses opens growth opportunities for fintech firms, but immediate profitability improvements are not guaranteed. Additional requirements and challenges arise during the transition to a banking area. The study acknowledges limitations and suggests further research to confirm and expand these findings in the evolving fintech landscape.","PeriodicalId":34805,"journal":{"name":"Finanse i Prawo Finansowe","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finanse i Prawo Finansowe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.3.39.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the article. This article explores the trend of fintech firms obtaining banking licenses, challenging their traditional advantage of not being banking institutions. It investigates two hypotheses: H1 – Banking licenses bring more opportunities than threats for fintech companies;H2 – Obtaining licenses positively impacts their profitability. Methodology. The study utilizes the literature review and applies Porter’s Five Forces methodology to assess the strategic implications of banking licenses for fintech firms. Financial analysis is conducted on three selected companies based on market capitalization, banking license timeline, and geographical diversification. Profitability ratios (ROE and ROA) are analyzed before and after obtaining the license. Results of the research. Fintech firms with banking licenses experience more opportunities than threats, as confirmed by Porter’s analysis. However, only one out of three analysed companies immediately improved profitability ratios after obtaining the license. In conclusion, obtaining banking licenses opens growth opportunities for fintech firms, but immediate profitability improvements are not guaranteed. Additional requirements and challenges arise during the transition to a banking area. The study acknowledges limitations and suggests further research to confirm and expand these findings in the evolving fintech landscape.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融科技是否应该成为银行(科技)?
文章的目的。本文探讨了金融科技公司获得银行牌照的趋势,挑战了它们不是银行机构的传统优势。它调查了两个假设: H1 -银行牌照为金融科技公司带来的机遇大于威胁;H2 -获得牌照对其盈利能力产生积极影响。 方法。本研究利用文献综述并应用波特五力方法来评估银行牌照对金融科技公司的战略影响。财务分析是根据市值、银行牌照时间和地域多元化对选定的三家公司进行的。分析获得许可前后的盈利能力比率(ROE和ROA)。 研究结果。正如波特的分析所证实的那样,拥有银行牌照的金融科技公司面临的机遇多于威胁。但是,被分析的企业中,只有三分之一的企业在获得许可后立即提高了利润率。总之,获得银行牌照为金融科技公司提供了增长机会,但不能保证立即提高盈利能力。在向银行领域过渡的过程中会出现额外的需求和挑战。该研究承认了局限性,并建议进一步研究,以在不断发展的金融科技领域证实和扩展这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Governmental Local Investment Fund as a Financial Instrument to Support Urban Investment by the Example of Cities with District Status in the Lodz Voivodeship Civic budget and its role in the process of urban reconstruction - a case study of the city of Lodz Rynek Indywidualnych Kont Emerytalnych w Polsce w kontekście Implementacji Ogólnoeuropejskiego Indywidualnego Produktu Emerytalnego Household Saving in Crisis – Literature Review Postrzeganie inflacji oraz metody ochrony studentów przed jej negatywnymi skutkami
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1