A micro-level study of research impact and motivational diversity

IF 4.6 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Technology Transfer Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1007/s10961-023-10040-y
Arturo Vega, Claudia Gabbioneta, Carlos Osorio, James Cunningham
{"title":"A micro-level study of research impact and motivational diversity","authors":"Arturo Vega, Claudia Gabbioneta, Carlos Osorio, James Cunningham","doi":"10.1007/s10961-023-10040-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract What motivates academics to pursue technology and knowledge transfer has been a growing area of research with recent calls for a deeper understanding of this issue. Technology and knowledge transfer are being positioned by policymakers and universities as part of the wider research impact agenda. Against this background, the purpose of this paper is to explore at a micro level the motivational diversity among academics in pursuing research impact. Set in a business school context, our study uses self-determination theory and an interpretive approach. We focus on the main motivations to be an academic in terms of the core psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness, the consequent intrinsic or extrinsic motivations for research impact, and the attitudes towards institutional measures for this practice. We identified six research impact groups, practice-oriented researchers, business seekers, instrumentalists, compliers, theoreticians, and relationship facilitators . We also found some friction between the motivations to be an academic and for research impact.","PeriodicalId":48228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technology Transfer","volume":"324 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technology Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10040-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract What motivates academics to pursue technology and knowledge transfer has been a growing area of research with recent calls for a deeper understanding of this issue. Technology and knowledge transfer are being positioned by policymakers and universities as part of the wider research impact agenda. Against this background, the purpose of this paper is to explore at a micro level the motivational diversity among academics in pursuing research impact. Set in a business school context, our study uses self-determination theory and an interpretive approach. We focus on the main motivations to be an academic in terms of the core psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness, the consequent intrinsic or extrinsic motivations for research impact, and the attitudes towards institutional measures for this practice. We identified six research impact groups, practice-oriented researchers, business seekers, instrumentalists, compliers, theoreticians, and relationship facilitators . We also found some friction between the motivations to be an academic and for research impact.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究影响与动机多样性的微观研究
是什么促使学者追求技术和知识转移一直是一个日益增长的研究领域,最近呼吁对这一问题有更深入的了解。政策制定者和大学正在把技术和知识转移定位为更广泛的研究影响议程的一部分。在此背景下,本文旨在从微观层面探讨学者追求研究影响的动机多样性。在商学院的背景下,我们的研究使用了自我决定理论和解释方法。我们将重点关注成为一名学者的主要动机,包括自主性、能力和相关性的核心心理需求,由此产生的研究影响的内在或外在动机,以及对这种实践的制度措施的态度。我们确定了六个研究影响群体,实践导向的研究人员,商业寻求者,工具学家,编译者,理论家和关系促进者。我们还发现,学术动机和研究影响力之间存在一些摩擦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: The Journal of Technology Transfer provides an international forum for research on the economic, managerial and policy implication of technology transfer, entrepreneurship, and innovation. The Journal is especially interested in articles that focus on the relationship between the external environment and organizations (governments, public agencies, firms, universities) and their innovation process. The Journal welcomes alternative modes of presentation ranging from broad empirical analyses, to theoretical models, to case studies based on theoretical foundations.  Officially cited as: J Technol Transf
期刊最新文献
An empirical investigation into UK university–industry collaboration: the development of an impact framework Supply chain constraints and research spending: an international investigation A micro-level study of research impact and motivational diversity Public biofoundries as innovation intermediaries: the integration of translation, sustainability, and responsibility Analysis of factors influencing attitude and intention to use electric vehicles for a sustainable future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1