Expectation of Engagement in Employment in 5 Years: Findings Among Participants With Spinal Cord Injury

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1177/00343552231209944
James S. Krause, Clara E. Dismuke-Greer, Karla Reed
{"title":"Expectation of Engagement in Employment in 5 Years: Findings Among Participants With Spinal Cord Injury","authors":"James S. Krause, Clara E. Dismuke-Greer, Karla Reed","doi":"10.1177/00343552231209944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to identify expectations of future engagement with employment among people with spinal cord injury (SCI), the underlying dimensions of engagement, and the relationship with demographic, SCI, and educational factors with engagement scales. Self-report data on the expectation of employment in 5 years were collected and analyzed from adult participants with traumatic SCI. Principal axis factor analysis with the varimax rotation was used to identify the underlying dimensions, and OLS was used to identify the relationship of demographic, SCI, and educational characteristics with the underlying dimensions. Most participants anticipated continuing to work about the same number of hours (61%), with 40% anticipating taking on more responsibility, 38% anticipating career advancement, and only 14% anticipating voluntary retirement. Factor analysis identified two underlying dimensions: job disengagement, measured by four items, and job engagement, measured by three items. Regression analysis indicated aging and years postinjury were highly related to both factors, with greater age and years postinjury related to disengagement. Completing a bachelor’s degree or higher was related to engagement. Non-Hispanic Blacks were more likely to have disengagement. Ambulatory participants were more likely to be engaged in employment. A relatively small number of items can easily measure individual expectations, particularly as they age with SCI.","PeriodicalId":47012,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin","volume":"267 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00343552231209944","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify expectations of future engagement with employment among people with spinal cord injury (SCI), the underlying dimensions of engagement, and the relationship with demographic, SCI, and educational factors with engagement scales. Self-report data on the expectation of employment in 5 years were collected and analyzed from adult participants with traumatic SCI. Principal axis factor analysis with the varimax rotation was used to identify the underlying dimensions, and OLS was used to identify the relationship of demographic, SCI, and educational characteristics with the underlying dimensions. Most participants anticipated continuing to work about the same number of hours (61%), with 40% anticipating taking on more responsibility, 38% anticipating career advancement, and only 14% anticipating voluntary retirement. Factor analysis identified two underlying dimensions: job disengagement, measured by four items, and job engagement, measured by three items. Regression analysis indicated aging and years postinjury were highly related to both factors, with greater age and years postinjury related to disengagement. Completing a bachelor’s degree or higher was related to engagement. Non-Hispanic Blacks were more likely to have disengagement. Ambulatory participants were more likely to be engaged in employment. A relatively small number of items can easily measure individual expectations, particularly as they age with SCI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓损伤患者对未来5年就业的期望
本研究的目的是确定脊髓损伤(SCI)患者对未来就业投入的期望,投入的潜在维度,以及与人口统计学,SCI和教育因素的关系。收集并分析了创伤性脊髓损伤成年患者5年就业预期的自我报告数据。采用主轴因子分析(Principal axis factor analysis)和变量旋转(variax rotation)来确定潜在维度,并使用OLS来确定人口统计学、SCI和教育特征与潜在维度的关系。大多数受访者(61%)希望继续工作相同的时间,40%的人希望承担更多的责任,38%的人希望职业发展,只有14%的人希望自愿退休。因素分析确定了两个基本维度:工作脱离,由四个项目衡量,以及工作投入,由三个项目衡量。回归分析表明,年龄和伤后年限与这两个因素高度相关,年龄和伤后年限与脱离相关更大。完成学士学位或更高的学位与敬业度有关。非西班牙裔黑人更有可能脱离社会。流动参与者更有可能从事就业。相对较少的项目可以很容易地衡量个人的期望,特别是当他们随着SCI长大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin (RCB) publishes articles on rehabilitation counseling with a major emphasis on data-based research reports, although other types of contributions to professional knowledge in rehabilitation counseling will be considered. Examples include articles that explain an innovative technique or application, point/ counterpoint debates on a current controversy challenging the profession, or insightful essays on an important issue. Contributions of these kinds may be considered for a special section of RCB. Article topics cover a wide range—from ethical dilemmas related to counseling clients with HIV/AIDS to clinical problem solving in micro–case management.
期刊最新文献
Psychometric Validation of the PROMIS Social Support Scale in a Sample of Individuals With Chronic Health Conditions and Disabilities: A Factor Analytic Study Family Perspectives on Promoting Paid Employment for Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Continuing Education Answer Sheet For Volume 67, No 2 Attachment, Relationships, Academic Problems, and Negative Emotions in Student Veterans With Disabilities Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale: Translation, Reliability, and Validation Study of the Turkish Version
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1