Ignacio M. Barberis, Rodrigo M. Freire, Guillermo A. Montero
{"title":"Tank Bromeliads as a Water Reservoir Used by Humans: An Important Overlooked Ecosystem Service in Xerophytic Forests","authors":"Ignacio M. Barberis, Rodrigo M. Freire, Guillermo A. Montero","doi":"10.1177/02780771231209131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Bromeliaceae are known for providing numerous ecosystem services. Tank bromeliads that collect water in the bases of their leaves have been an important source of water for people in semiarid regions such as the Gran Chaco. In this large area characterized by xerophytic vegetation grows Aechmea distichantha, the only Chaquenian terrestrial tank bromeliad. We carried out a literature review on water consumption from this tank bromeliad by people in this region. Then, we analyzed the variations in the amount of water stored in the tanks of plants from observational studies as well as the effects of the amount and frequency of water addition on the hydrology of water retained in the tank from an irrigation experiment study. We found 85 reports on the consumption of water from A. distichantha plants by people, including several Indigenous Groups, Criollos, and Soldiers. According to these reports, the tank accumulates about a liter of relatively fresh and clear water that lasts for several weeks. Our observational study showed a large variation in the amount of water held in the tank among years and sites, and our irrigation experiment showed that even plants receiving low and unevenly distributed rainfall conserved some water in their tanks. All these results support the importance of this tank bromeliad for surviving when moving in Eastern Chaco during dry periods until the beginning of the twentieth century. At present, it seems that people living in sedentarism no longer frequently use it for water provision, highlighting that the relative importance of a plant species for providing ecosystem services depends on the historical context.","PeriodicalId":54838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnobiology","volume":"106 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02780771231209131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Bromeliaceae are known for providing numerous ecosystem services. Tank bromeliads that collect water in the bases of their leaves have been an important source of water for people in semiarid regions such as the Gran Chaco. In this large area characterized by xerophytic vegetation grows Aechmea distichantha, the only Chaquenian terrestrial tank bromeliad. We carried out a literature review on water consumption from this tank bromeliad by people in this region. Then, we analyzed the variations in the amount of water stored in the tanks of plants from observational studies as well as the effects of the amount and frequency of water addition on the hydrology of water retained in the tank from an irrigation experiment study. We found 85 reports on the consumption of water from A. distichantha plants by people, including several Indigenous Groups, Criollos, and Soldiers. According to these reports, the tank accumulates about a liter of relatively fresh and clear water that lasts for several weeks. Our observational study showed a large variation in the amount of water held in the tank among years and sites, and our irrigation experiment showed that even plants receiving low and unevenly distributed rainfall conserved some water in their tanks. All these results support the importance of this tank bromeliad for surviving when moving in Eastern Chaco during dry periods until the beginning of the twentieth century. At present, it seems that people living in sedentarism no longer frequently use it for water provision, highlighting that the relative importance of a plant species for providing ecosystem services depends on the historical context.
期刊介绍:
JoE’s readership is as wide and diverse as ethnobiology itself, with readers spanning from both the natural and social sciences. Not surprisingly, a glance at the papers published in the Journal reveals the depth and breadth of topics, extending from studies in archaeology and the origins of agriculture, to folk classification systems, to food composition, plants, birds, mammals, fungi and everything in between.
Research areas published in JoE include but are not limited to neo- and paleo-ethnobiology, zooarchaeology, ethnobotany, ethnozoology, ethnopharmacology, ethnoecology, linguistic ethnobiology, human paleoecology, and many other related fields of study within anthropology and biology, such as taxonomy, conservation biology, ethnography, political ecology, and cognitive and cultural anthropology.
JoE does not limit itself to a single perspective, approach or discipline, but seeks to represent the full spectrum and wide diversity of the field of ethnobiology, including cognitive, symbolic, linguistic, ecological, and economic aspects of human interactions with our living world. Articles that significantly advance ethnobiological theory and/or methodology are particularly welcome, as well as studies bridging across disciplines and knowledge systems. JoE does not publish uncontextualized data such as species lists; appropriate submissions must elaborate on the ethnobiological context of findings.