Ecosourcing for resilience in a changing environment

IF 0.8 4区 生物学 Q4 PLANT SCIENCES New Zealand Journal of Botany Pub Date : 2023-05-30 DOI:10.1080/0028825x.2023.2210289
Peter B. Heenan, William G. Lee, Matt S. McGlone, James K. McCarthy, Caroline M. Mitchell, Matthew J. Larcombe, Gary J. Houliston
{"title":"Ecosourcing for resilience in a changing environment","authors":"Peter B. Heenan, William G. Lee, Matt S. McGlone, James K. McCarthy, Caroline M. Mitchell, Matthew J. Larcombe, Gary J. Houliston","doi":"10.1080/0028825x.2023.2210289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ecosourcing seed of ‘local genetic stock’ for ecological restoration has been practiced in New Zealand for about 50 years. However, we believe that it has become unnecessarily restrictive. Ecosourcing ensures plants used for restoration are adapted to local conditions and maintains current distributional patterns. It also restricts genetic diversity, confines species to their historic range, and reduces the conservation options for threatened species. For example, New Zealand tree species, the life form most frequently used in restoration plantings, have low population genetic differentiation and high net migration of alleles throughout their range. Therefore, very little is gained through restrictive ecosourcing of tree seed. Furthermore, avoidance of the danger of inbreeding depression and widening the scope for closer environmental matching, argues for larger rather smaller source areas. Climate change, extinctions across multiple trophic levels, habitat loss and fragmentation, spread of invasive species, and novel habitats have completely altered the contemporary biotic landscape. Conservation needs to engage with these changes if it is to protect and restore ecosystems. Restrictive ecosourcing is counter-productive as it limits utilising genotypic, phenotypic and ecotypic diversity, and thus the evolutionary potential of indigenous species and ecosystems. It also reduces opportunities to protect biodiversity when populations are small, and limits response to climate change. A new approach is needed. We recommend that phylogeographic patterns and biogeographic boundaries be used to set nine broad ecosourcing regions and, within these regions, phenotypic adaptation to particular environments be used as a guide to seed selection. This more relaxed approach to ecosourcing will improve restoration outcomes through increasing species and genetic diversity, reducing the detrimental effects of inbreeding and promoting the genetic rescue of populations of threatened species. Examples of adopting an eco-evolutionary approach to ecosourcing are provided for the early-successional coloniser Kunzea ericoides and late-successional conifer species.","PeriodicalId":19317,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Journal of Botany","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825x.2023.2210289","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Ecosourcing seed of ‘local genetic stock’ for ecological restoration has been practiced in New Zealand for about 50 years. However, we believe that it has become unnecessarily restrictive. Ecosourcing ensures plants used for restoration are adapted to local conditions and maintains current distributional patterns. It also restricts genetic diversity, confines species to their historic range, and reduces the conservation options for threatened species. For example, New Zealand tree species, the life form most frequently used in restoration plantings, have low population genetic differentiation and high net migration of alleles throughout their range. Therefore, very little is gained through restrictive ecosourcing of tree seed. Furthermore, avoidance of the danger of inbreeding depression and widening the scope for closer environmental matching, argues for larger rather smaller source areas. Climate change, extinctions across multiple trophic levels, habitat loss and fragmentation, spread of invasive species, and novel habitats have completely altered the contemporary biotic landscape. Conservation needs to engage with these changes if it is to protect and restore ecosystems. Restrictive ecosourcing is counter-productive as it limits utilising genotypic, phenotypic and ecotypic diversity, and thus the evolutionary potential of indigenous species and ecosystems. It also reduces opportunities to protect biodiversity when populations are small, and limits response to climate change. A new approach is needed. We recommend that phylogeographic patterns and biogeographic boundaries be used to set nine broad ecosourcing regions and, within these regions, phenotypic adaptation to particular environments be used as a guide to seed selection. This more relaxed approach to ecosourcing will improve restoration outcomes through increasing species and genetic diversity, reducing the detrimental effects of inbreeding and promoting the genetic rescue of populations of threatened species. Examples of adopting an eco-evolutionary approach to ecosourcing are provided for the early-successional coloniser Kunzea ericoides and late-successional conifer species.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在不断变化的环境中恢复生态资源
“本地遗传资源”的生态种子在新西兰已经实践了大约50年。然而,我们认为它已变得不必要地具有限制性。生态采购确保用于恢复的植物适应当地条件并保持当前的分布模式。它还限制了遗传多样性,将物种限制在其历史范围内,并减少了对受威胁物种的保护选择。例如,新西兰树种是最常用于恢复种植的生命形式,其种群遗传分化低,等位基因在其整个范围内的净迁移率高。因此,通过限制性的树木种子生态源获得的收益很少。此外,为了避免近亲繁殖衰退的危险和扩大更接近环境匹配的范围,主张更大而不是更小的来源区域。气候变化、多种营养水平的灭绝、栖息地的丧失和破碎化、入侵物种的传播以及新栖息地的出现,已经彻底改变了当代生物景观。如果要保护和恢复生态系统,自然保护就需要参与这些变化。限制性生态源是适得其反的,因为它限制了对基因型、表型和生态型多样性的利用,从而限制了本地物种和生态系统的进化潜力。它还减少了在人口稀少时保护生物多样性的机会,并限制了对气候变化的反应。需要一种新的方法。我们建议使用系统地理模式和生物地理边界来确定9个广泛的生态源区域,并在这些区域内,将对特定环境的表型适应作为种子选择的指导。通过增加物种和遗传多样性,减少近亲繁殖的有害影响,促进濒危物种种群的遗传拯救,这种更宽松的生态外包方法将改善恢复结果。采用生态进化方法进行生态源溯源的实例是早期演替的殖民昆山和晚期演替的针叶树。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Zealand Journal of Botany
New Zealand Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
22.20%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The New Zealand Journal of Botany publishes original research papers, review papers, perspectives, short communications, forum articles, letter and book reviews. We welcome submissions relevant to all aspects of the botany, mycology, and phycology of the South Pacific, Australia, South America, and Southern Africa. The journal’s subject matter encompasses biosystematics and biogeography, ecology, physiology, biochemistry, genetics, reproductive biology, structure and development, taxonomy, ethnobotany, palaeobotany, bryology, lichenology, mycology, plant pathology, and phycology.
期刊最新文献
Palynological, tephra, and 14C records from southern Kaitoke, Great Barrier (Aotea) Island, New Zealand, since c. 30,000 cal. yr BP The mycoremediation potential of phyllosphere fungi in urban ornamental plants in Sri Lanka with mathematical models for PAH degradation Pleurotus spp: an ultimate solution to the emerging calamities of the world Vascular epiphytes of the South America Dry Diagonal: characterising their occurrence and richness in this neglected region Limestone ferns: a review of the substrate characteristics and species diversity in selected geographic regions and genera
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1