Estimating ice discharge of the Antarctic Peninsula using different ice-thickness datasets

IF 2.5 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Annals of Glaciology Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1017/aog.2023.67
Kaian Shahateet, Francisco Navarro, Thorsten Seehaus, Johannes J. Fürst, Matthias Braun
{"title":"Estimating ice discharge of the Antarctic Peninsula using different ice-thickness datasets","authors":"Kaian Shahateet, Francisco Navarro, Thorsten Seehaus, Johannes J. Fürst, Matthias Braun","doi":"10.1017/aog.2023.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Antarctic Peninsula Ice Sheet (APIS) has become a significant contributor to sea-level rise over recent decades. Accurately estimating the ice discharge from the outlet glaciers of the APIS is crucial to quantify the mass balance of the Antarctic Peninsula. We here compute the ice discharge from the outlet glaciers of the APIS north of 70 ${^\\circ }$ S for the five most widely used ice-thickness reconstructions, using a common surface velocity field and a common set of flux gates, so the differences in ice discharge can be solely attributed to the differences in ice thickness at the flux gates. The total volumetric ice discharge for 2015–2017 ranges within 45–141 km 3 a −1 , depending on the ice-thickness model, with a mean of 87 ± 44 km 3 a −1 . The substantial differences between the ice-discharge results, and a multi-model normalized root-mean-squared deviation of 0.91 for the whole data set, reveal large differences and inconsistencies between the ice-thickness models, giving an indication of the large uncertainty in the current ice-discharge estimates for the APIS. This manifests a fundamental problem of the region: the scarcity of appropriate ice-thickness measurements and the difficulty of the current models to reconstruct the ice-thickness distribution in this complex region.","PeriodicalId":8211,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Glaciology","volume":"9 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Glaciology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2023.67","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The Antarctic Peninsula Ice Sheet (APIS) has become a significant contributor to sea-level rise over recent decades. Accurately estimating the ice discharge from the outlet glaciers of the APIS is crucial to quantify the mass balance of the Antarctic Peninsula. We here compute the ice discharge from the outlet glaciers of the APIS north of 70 ${^\circ }$ S for the five most widely used ice-thickness reconstructions, using a common surface velocity field and a common set of flux gates, so the differences in ice discharge can be solely attributed to the differences in ice thickness at the flux gates. The total volumetric ice discharge for 2015–2017 ranges within 45–141 km 3 a −1 , depending on the ice-thickness model, with a mean of 87 ± 44 km 3 a −1 . The substantial differences between the ice-discharge results, and a multi-model normalized root-mean-squared deviation of 0.91 for the whole data set, reveal large differences and inconsistencies between the ice-thickness models, giving an indication of the large uncertainty in the current ice-discharge estimates for the APIS. This manifests a fundamental problem of the region: the scarcity of appropriate ice-thickness measurements and the difficulty of the current models to reconstruct the ice-thickness distribution in this complex region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用不同冰厚数据集估算南极半岛冰流量
近几十年来,南极半岛冰盖(APIS)已成为海平面上升的重要贡献者。准确估算南极冰原出口冰川的冰流量对量化南极半岛的物质平衡至关重要。在此,我们使用一个共同的表面速度场和一组共同的通量门,计算了在70 ${^\circ}$ S以北的五个最广泛使用的冰厚重建的api出口冰川的冰流量,因此冰流量的差异可以完全归因于通量门处冰厚的差异。根据不同的冰厚模式,2015-2017年的总冰流量在45-141 km 3 a−1之间,平均为87±44 km 3 a−1。冰流量结果之间的巨大差异,以及整个数据集的多模型归一化均方根偏差为0.91,表明冰厚度模型之间存在很大差异和不一致性,表明目前api冰流量估计存在很大的不确定性。这反映了该地区的一个根本问题:缺乏适当的冰厚测量,现有模型难以重建这一复杂地区的冰厚分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Glaciology
Annals of Glaciology GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Glaciology publishes original scientific articles and letters in selected aspects of glaciology-the study of ice. Each issue of the Annals is thematic, focussing on a specific subject. The Council of the International Glaciological Society welcomes proposals for thematic issues from the glaciological community. Once a theme is approved, the Council appoints an Associate Chief Editor and a team of Scientific Editors to handle the submission, peer review and publication of papers.
期刊最新文献
Dye tracing of upward brine migration in snow MoT-PSA: a two-layer depth-averaged model for simulation of powder snow avalanches on 3-D terrain Resolution enhanced sea ice concentration: a new algorithm applied to AMSR2 microwave radiometry data Particle tracking in snow avalanches with in situ calibrated inertial measurement units Updating glacier inventories on the periphery of Antarctica and Greenland using multi-source data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1