An experimental investigation into sifting and fluidization segregation characteristics for coal fly ash

IF 2.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Particulate Science and Technology Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1080/02726351.2023.2265313
Rachit Poddar, S. S. Mallick, Lal Kundan
{"title":"An experimental investigation into sifting and fluidization segregation characteristics for coal fly ash","authors":"Rachit Poddar, S. S. Mallick, Lal Kundan","doi":"10.1080/02726351.2023.2265313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractSifting and fluidization segregation characteristics were determined for 6 different fly ash samples (particle size ‘d50’ ranging from 68 µm to 141 µm) using standard testers. The results have shown that the coarser particles have a greater tendency to sifting segregation, and the finer powders respond more to fluidization segregation. The angle of repose for the fine ash and coarse ash were 55° and 38°, respectively, which indicated poor to good flowability conditions. The flow function test shows that all the samples were in an easy-flowing to a free-flowing zone. The angle of repose and material flow function have provided a good correlation with the sifting segregation index. In contrast, cohesion between particles, the ratio of free terminal velocities and diameters for coarse to fine particles have shown a good fit with fluidization segregation indices. For both sifting and fluidization segregation, the model correlation values are 0.91 and 0.94, indicating the predicted results are a good fit to the experimental data.Keywords: Sifting and fluidization segregationsegregation indexangle of reposecohesionterminal settling velocity AcknowledgementThe authors acknowledge the collaboration between Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology (TIET) and Granutools (Belgium) for using the GranuHeap instrument.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":19742,"journal":{"name":"Particulate Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Particulate Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2023.2265313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractSifting and fluidization segregation characteristics were determined for 6 different fly ash samples (particle size ‘d50’ ranging from 68 µm to 141 µm) using standard testers. The results have shown that the coarser particles have a greater tendency to sifting segregation, and the finer powders respond more to fluidization segregation. The angle of repose for the fine ash and coarse ash were 55° and 38°, respectively, which indicated poor to good flowability conditions. The flow function test shows that all the samples were in an easy-flowing to a free-flowing zone. The angle of repose and material flow function have provided a good correlation with the sifting segregation index. In contrast, cohesion between particles, the ratio of free terminal velocities and diameters for coarse to fine particles have shown a good fit with fluidization segregation indices. For both sifting and fluidization segregation, the model correlation values are 0.91 and 0.94, indicating the predicted results are a good fit to the experimental data.Keywords: Sifting and fluidization segregationsegregation indexangle of reposecohesionterminal settling velocity AcknowledgementThe authors acknowledge the collaboration between Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology (TIET) and Granutools (Belgium) for using the GranuHeap instrument.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粉煤灰筛分与流化偏析特性的实验研究
摘要采用标准测试仪对6种不同粒径(粒径范围为68µm ~ 141µm)的粉煤灰样品进行了筛分和流态化分离特性测定。结果表明,粗颗粒具有较大的筛分偏析倾向,细颗粒具有较大的流化偏析倾向。细灰分休止角为55°,粗灰分休止角为38°,流动性较差或较好。流动函数测试表明,所有样品均处于易流动至自由流动区。休止角和物料流函数与筛分偏析指标有较好的相关性。颗粒间黏聚力、粗颗粒与细颗粒的自由末端速度与粒径之比与流化偏析指标吻合较好。对于筛分和流化分离,模型相关值分别为0.91和0.94,表明预测结果与实验数据拟合较好。关键词:筛分与流态化分离分离分离分离角末端沉降速度作者感谢塔帕尔工程技术研究所(TIET)和Granutools(比利时)合作使用GranuHeap仪器。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Particulate Science and Technology
Particulate Science and Technology 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Particulate Science and Technology, an interdisciplinary journal, publishes papers on both fundamental and applied science and technology related to particles and particle systems in size scales from nanometers to millimeters. The journal''s primary focus is to report emerging technologies and advances in different fields of engineering, energy, biomaterials, and pharmaceutical science involving particles, and to bring institutional researchers closer to professionals in industries. Particulate Science and Technology invites articles reporting original contributions and review papers, in particular critical reviews, that are relevant and timely to the emerging and growing fields of particle and powder technology.
期刊最新文献
Tribo-performance analysis of HVOF sprayed Colmonoy-88 using the Taguchi method Preparation of Au-MoS2 photocatalyst with a green synthesis method and its application in water contaminant degradation Effect of ash-bridge deposition in asymmetric diesel particulate filter channels on the pressure drop and particulate matter trapping characteristics The effects of processing parameters on the shape of particle size distribution and grinding rate in a stirred mill Synergic fabrication of gold – iron oxide magnetic nanohybrids as a potential agent for thermosensitizing and magnetic resonance-high intensity focused ultrasound (mr-HIFU) treatment in uterine myomas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1