Budesonide Extended Release for Ulcerative Colitis

Sara D. Khangura, Carolyn Spry
{"title":"Budesonide Extended Release for Ulcerative Colitis","authors":"Sara D. Khangura, Carolyn Spry","doi":"10.51731/cjht.2023.748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"
 In 2017, the CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee recommended that budesonide extended release (with multi-matrix system) not be reimbursed for the induction of remission in patients with active mild to moderate ulcerative colitis based on limitations in the evidence at that time.
 The limited primary clinical evidence (i.e., 1 randomized controlled trial) published since the literature searches conducted for the previous CADTH Reimbursement Review corroborates the clinical findings of that report. The evidence demonstrates that budesonide extended release is more effective for inducing remission in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis compared to placebo.
 No new clinical evidence was identified describing head-to-head comparisons of budesonide extended release with active therapies. Indirect comparative evidence between budesonide extended release and other active therapies suggests minimal or no difference in remission, clinical response, or adverse events.
 Cost-effectiveness evidence from 1 study conducted in the Netherlands indicates that budesonide extended release is a more effective and less costly second-line therapy versus aggregated comparators for patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis.
 Evidence-based recommendations support the use of budesonide extended release for patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis who have not responded to 5-ASAs.
 No clinical or cost-effectiveness evidence or evidence-based recommendations were found describing the use of budesonide extended release in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.
","PeriodicalId":9437,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2023.748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2017, the CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee recommended that budesonide extended release (with multi-matrix system) not be reimbursed for the induction of remission in patients with active mild to moderate ulcerative colitis based on limitations in the evidence at that time. The limited primary clinical evidence (i.e., 1 randomized controlled trial) published since the literature searches conducted for the previous CADTH Reimbursement Review corroborates the clinical findings of that report. The evidence demonstrates that budesonide extended release is more effective for inducing remission in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis compared to placebo. No new clinical evidence was identified describing head-to-head comparisons of budesonide extended release with active therapies. Indirect comparative evidence between budesonide extended release and other active therapies suggests minimal or no difference in remission, clinical response, or adverse events. Cost-effectiveness evidence from 1 study conducted in the Netherlands indicates that budesonide extended release is a more effective and less costly second-line therapy versus aggregated comparators for patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. Evidence-based recommendations support the use of budesonide extended release for patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis who have not responded to 5-ASAs. No clinical or cost-effectiveness evidence or evidence-based recommendations were found describing the use of budesonide extended release in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布地奈德缓释治疗溃疡性结肠炎
& # x0D;2017年,CADTH加拿大药物专家委员会建议,基于当时证据的局限性,布地奈德缓释(多基质系统)不用于诱导活动性轻至中度溃疡性结肠炎患者缓解。 自之前的CADTH报销审查进行文献检索以来,发表的有限的主要临床证据(即1个随机对照试验)证实了该报告的临床发现。有证据表明,布地奈德缓释对轻度至中度溃疡性结肠炎患者诱导缓解比安慰剂更有效。 没有发现新的临床证据来描述布地奈德缓释与积极治疗的正面比较。布地奈德缓释与其他积极治疗的间接比较证据表明,在缓解、临床反应或不良事件方面差异极小或无差异。 在荷兰进行的一项研究的成本效益证据表明,布地奈德缓释治疗是一种更有效、成本更低的二线治疗,而不是综合比较治疗轻至中度溃疡性结肠炎。 循证建议支持使用布地奈德缓释期治疗对5- asa无反应的轻至中度溃疡性结肠炎患者。没有临床或成本效益证据或循证建议描述布地奈德缓释期用于中重度溃疡性结肠炎患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relugolix (Orgovyx) Nabilone for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Newborn Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus in Canada 2023 Abstracts of the Canadian Association for Population Therapeutics The Development of a Model Validation Tool to Assist in the Conduct of Economic Evaluations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1