Can school-based physical activity interventions be effective without a facilitator? A step-back approach to school-based intervention delivery

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Irish Educational Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1080/03323315.2023.2264271
Yvonne O’Byrne, J. Dinneen, T. Coppinger
{"title":"Can school-based physical activity interventions be effective without a facilitator? A step-back approach to school-based intervention delivery","authors":"Yvonne O’Byrne, J. Dinneen, T. Coppinger","doi":"10.1080/03323315.2023.2264271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Irish children’s physical activity (PA) levels are below national guidelines. Schools are an ideal setting to promote PA but it remains challenging. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a step-back approach to Project Spraoi (PS); a facilitator (Energizer) led school-based PA intervention. Each Energizer in year one had 2 contact days per week with all classes (n = 11). A ‘step-back’ progression, with 50% less Energizer contact time, in year two and no Energizer contact in year three, was adopted. Objectively measured PA and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) were measured annually with the same children (n = 85). Stakeholders (children (n = 287), teachers (n = 11) and other school staff (n = 8)), participated in process evaluation data collection. After an initial increase in year one, PA levels declined in year two and three; yet all children were more active at intervention end compared to baseline (p < 0.05). The biggest barriers to implementation were a lack of time and ‘lack of Energizer contact’, with the Energizer cited as the most frequently identified facilitator by all stakeholders. This study outlines the importance of a facilitator in the long-term success of health promotion intervention delivery in a primary school context.","PeriodicalId":46076,"journal":{"name":"Irish Educational Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Educational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2264271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Irish children’s physical activity (PA) levels are below national guidelines. Schools are an ideal setting to promote PA but it remains challenging. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a step-back approach to Project Spraoi (PS); a facilitator (Energizer) led school-based PA intervention. Each Energizer in year one had 2 contact days per week with all classes (n = 11). A ‘step-back’ progression, with 50% less Energizer contact time, in year two and no Energizer contact in year three, was adopted. Objectively measured PA and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) were measured annually with the same children (n = 85). Stakeholders (children (n = 287), teachers (n = 11) and other school staff (n = 8)), participated in process evaluation data collection. After an initial increase in year one, PA levels declined in year two and three; yet all children were more active at intervention end compared to baseline (p < 0.05). The biggest barriers to implementation were a lack of time and ‘lack of Energizer contact’, with the Energizer cited as the most frequently identified facilitator by all stakeholders. This study outlines the importance of a facilitator in the long-term success of health promotion intervention delivery in a primary school context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
没有促进者,以学校为基础的体育活动干预措施是否有效?以退后的方式提供校本干预措施
爱尔兰儿童的身体活动(PA)水平低于国家指导标准。学校是推广私人教育的理想场所,但它仍然具有挑战性。本研究评估了Spraoi项目(PS)的退步方法的有效性;促进者(Energizer)领导了以学校为基础的PA干预。第一年每个劲量每周有2天与所有班级接触(n = 11)。采用“后退”的方法,第二年减少50%的劲量接触时间,第三年不接触劲量。每年对同一组儿童(n = 85)客观测量PA和心肺适能(CRF)。利益相关者(儿童(n = 287)、教师(n = 11)和其他学校工作人员(n = 8))参与了过程评价数据的收集。在第一年的初始增加之后,PA水平在第二年和第三年下降;然而,与基线相比,所有儿童在干预结束时都更活跃(p < 0.05)。实施的最大障碍是缺乏时间和“缺乏与劲量公司的联系”,所有利益相关者都认为劲量公司是最常见的推动者。本研究概述了在小学环境中促进健康干预措施长期成功实施的促进者的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Educational Studies
Irish Educational Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
23.50%
发文量
78
期刊最新文献
The characteristic elements of TeachMeet Strengthening wellbeing in schools after COVID-19: a pilot evaluation of an awareness based intervention for children and young people Workaholism in higher education. An exploration of the cognitive, emotional, motivational, and behavioural elements ‘I’ll do it tomorrow’: supporting the engagement of primary pre-service teachers through blended, inquiry-based learning ‘Bearing witness to negativity’: towards just futures of education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1