The Supreme People’s Court of China ruled on the first pharmaceutical patent linkage case after the new Patent Law

Hongxuyang Lu
{"title":"The Supreme People’s Court of China ruled on the first pharmaceutical patent linkage case after the new Patent Law","authors":"Hongxuyang Lu","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the first case regarding the pharmaceutical patent linkage regime in China, the Supreme People’s Court of China ruled that the validity of a patent did not affect a pharmaceutical patent linkage case. Whether the technical solution of the generic drug falls within the scope of protection of a patent should be judged based on the submitted application for marketing authorization, instead of the actual technical solution implemented.","PeriodicalId":44529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the first case regarding the pharmaceutical patent linkage regime in China, the Supreme People’s Court of China ruled that the validity of a patent did not affect a pharmaceutical patent linkage case. Whether the technical solution of the generic drug falls within the scope of protection of a patent should be judged based on the submitted application for marketing authorization, instead of the actual technical solution implemented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国最高人民法院就新专利法实施后的第一起药品专利联动案作出裁决
摘要在中国第一起药品专利联动制度案件中,中国最高人民法院裁定专利效力不影响药品专利联动案件。仿制药的技术方案是否属于专利保护范围,应根据提交的上市许可申请进行判断,而不是根据实际实施的技术方案进行判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
114
期刊最新文献
The author as revenue sharer: lecture in memory of William R. Cornish From rules to methods: application of international intellectual property treaties in domestic courts of China IP Dramatis Personae Critical reflections on Sri Lanka’s new sui generis geographical indication registration system The changing nature of international intellectual property
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1