The Things We Already Know and the Things We're Set Up Not to See: Folkloristics, COVID-19, and the Traps of Amplification

IF 0.4 3区 社会学 0 FOLKLORE JOURNAL OF FOLKLORE RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2979/jfr.2023.a886954
Whitney Phillips, Jeffrey A. Tolbert
{"title":"The Things We Already Know and the Things We're Set Up Not to See: Folkloristics, COVID-19, and the Traps of Amplification","authors":"Whitney Phillips, Jeffrey A. Tolbert","doi":"10.2979/jfr.2023.a886954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: COVID-19 folklore can be deadly. It also poses a particular set of challenges to researchers endeavoring to study it, and indeed, to researchers who are not actively studying it yet still find themselves confronted by it on their social media feeds. These challenges emerge from digital constraints and affordances that obscure—and are designed to obscure—digital folklore's full context, resulting in vexing problems of amplification, rampant artifactualization, and potential weaponization by bad actors. Folklorists can minimize these outcomes by drawing from methodological insights of the past, while at the same time zeroing in on the unique contours of the present. Erving Goffman's analysis of everyday performance, for instance, provides a critical methodological entry point to digital ethnographies, with one internet-era update. Online, seemingly backstage elements—from digital tools to platform affordances to algorithms—are a critical part of the frontstage. The ethnographic vistas that open up when the online backstage is reframed as the online frontstage help foster stronger, more nuanced digital folkloristics. This also encourages researchers to reflect on the reciprocal influences of technologies, and how we all impact our networks through everyday actions like sharing, commenting, and liking.","PeriodicalId":44620,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FOLKLORE RESEARCH","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FOLKLORE RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/jfr.2023.a886954","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FOLKLORE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: COVID-19 folklore can be deadly. It also poses a particular set of challenges to researchers endeavoring to study it, and indeed, to researchers who are not actively studying it yet still find themselves confronted by it on their social media feeds. These challenges emerge from digital constraints and affordances that obscure—and are designed to obscure—digital folklore's full context, resulting in vexing problems of amplification, rampant artifactualization, and potential weaponization by bad actors. Folklorists can minimize these outcomes by drawing from methodological insights of the past, while at the same time zeroing in on the unique contours of the present. Erving Goffman's analysis of everyday performance, for instance, provides a critical methodological entry point to digital ethnographies, with one internet-era update. Online, seemingly backstage elements—from digital tools to platform affordances to algorithms—are a critical part of the frontstage. The ethnographic vistas that open up when the online backstage is reframed as the online frontstage help foster stronger, more nuanced digital folkloristics. This also encourages researchers to reflect on the reciprocal influences of technologies, and how we all impact our networks through everyday actions like sharing, commenting, and liking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们已经知道的事情和我们设置不看的事情:民俗学,COVID-19和放大的陷阱
摘要:COVID-19的民间传说可能是致命的。它也给努力研究它的研究人员带来了一系列特殊的挑战,事实上,对那些没有积极研究它但仍然发现自己在社交媒体上面临它的研究人员来说也是如此。这些挑战来自于数字限制和支持,这些限制和支持模糊了数字民间传说的完整背景,并被设计为模糊,导致了放大、猖獗的人为化和潜在的不良行为者武器化等令人烦恼的问题。民俗学家可以通过借鉴过去的方法论见解来减少这些结果,同时将注意力集中在当前的独特轮廓上。例如,欧文·戈夫曼(Erving Goffman)对日常行为的分析,为数字人种学提供了一个关键的方法论切入点,其中有一个互联网时代的更新。在网上,看似后台的元素——从数字工具到平台支持再到算法——是前台的关键部分。当在线后台被重新定义为在线前台时,打开的民族志前景有助于培养更强大、更细致入微的数字民俗学。这也鼓励研究人员反思技术的相互影响,以及我们如何通过分享、评论和点赞等日常行为影响我们的网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Journal of Folklore Research has provided an international forum for current theory and research among scholars of traditional culture since 1964. Each issue includes topical, incisive articles of current theoretical interest to folklore and ethnomusicology as international disciplines, as well as essays that address the fieldwork experience and the intellectual history of folklore and ethnomusicology studies. Contributors include scholars and professionals in additional fields, including anthropology, area studies, communication, cultural studies, history, linguistics, literature, performance studies, religion, and semiotics.
期刊最新文献
Humor in the Time of Coronavirus: Pandemic and Expert Health Knowledge In Search of Hope amid Despair in Folklore of Epidemics Spreading Through the Streets: The COVID-19 Street Art Database The Things We Already Know and the Things We're Set Up Not to See: Folkloristics, COVID-19, and the Traps of Amplification Chinese Tales of Epidemics: In Search of Hope amid Despair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1