Characterization, nitrogen availability and agronomic efficiency of fermented composts in organic vegetable production

Livia Bischof Pian, José Guilherme Marinho Guerra, Ricardo Luis Louro Berbara, Monalisa Santana Coelho de Jesus, José Barbosa Junior, Ednaldo da Silva Araújo
{"title":"Characterization, nitrogen availability and agronomic efficiency of fermented composts in organic vegetable production","authors":"Livia Bischof Pian, José Guilherme Marinho Guerra, Ricardo Luis Louro Berbara, Monalisa Santana Coelho de Jesus, José Barbosa Junior, Ednaldo da Silva Araújo","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2416692/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Fermented composts obtained from a mixture of raw materials and a microbial inoculant, known as “bokashi,” are alternatives used by many farmers around the world. We evaluated the chemical composition, fermentation pathways, N availability, and agronomic efficiency of fermented compost obtained from different plant-based raw materials. The standard compost formulation composition was 60% wheat bran and 40% castor bean bran. From this formulation, wheat bran was gradually replaced by coffee husk, brewery residue, and elephant grass bran, and leguminous bran replaced castor bean bran. Incubation tests evaluated nutrient content (C, N, P, K, Ca, Mg), pH, electrical conductivity, and fermentation pathways (by the organic acids lactic, acetic, propanoic, butyric, and ethanol). A bioassay in greenhouse conditions accessed N availability. Additionally, a field experiment evaluated the agronomic efficiency of 5 formulations and 4 doses (0 to 400 kg N ha − ¹) in successive vegetable production. The formulations with a balanced C/N ratio showed the potential to combine desirable fermentative and nutritional characteristics with good N availability and plant growth. Some formulations drastically changed the compost characteristics, especially the full replacement of wheat bran for coffee husk and elephant grass, which presented undesirable fermentation pathways. Leguminous bran maintained the fermentative quality and increased the soil’s biological activity but decreased the nutrient content, N availability, and vegetable productivity. The brewery residue showed the most prominent fermentation quality, nutrient content, and N availability. The addition of 30% coffee husk resulted in agronomic performance and nutrient accumulation similar to the standard compost.","PeriodicalId":500086,"journal":{"name":"Research Square (Research Square)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square (Research Square)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2416692/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Fermented composts obtained from a mixture of raw materials and a microbial inoculant, known as “bokashi,” are alternatives used by many farmers around the world. We evaluated the chemical composition, fermentation pathways, N availability, and agronomic efficiency of fermented compost obtained from different plant-based raw materials. The standard compost formulation composition was 60% wheat bran and 40% castor bean bran. From this formulation, wheat bran was gradually replaced by coffee husk, brewery residue, and elephant grass bran, and leguminous bran replaced castor bean bran. Incubation tests evaluated nutrient content (C, N, P, K, Ca, Mg), pH, electrical conductivity, and fermentation pathways (by the organic acids lactic, acetic, propanoic, butyric, and ethanol). A bioassay in greenhouse conditions accessed N availability. Additionally, a field experiment evaluated the agronomic efficiency of 5 formulations and 4 doses (0 to 400 kg N ha − ¹) in successive vegetable production. The formulations with a balanced C/N ratio showed the potential to combine desirable fermentative and nutritional characteristics with good N availability and plant growth. Some formulations drastically changed the compost characteristics, especially the full replacement of wheat bran for coffee husk and elephant grass, which presented undesirable fermentation pathways. Leguminous bran maintained the fermentative quality and increased the soil’s biological activity but decreased the nutrient content, N availability, and vegetable productivity. The brewery residue showed the most prominent fermentation quality, nutrient content, and N availability. The addition of 30% coffee husk resulted in agronomic performance and nutrient accumulation similar to the standard compost.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有机蔬菜发酵堆肥的特性、氮素有效性和农艺效率
从原料和微生物接种剂的混合物中获得的发酵堆肥,被称为“bokashi”,是世界各地许多农民使用的替代品。我们评估了由不同植物原料制成的发酵堆肥的化学成分、发酵途径、氮有效性和农艺效率。标准堆肥配方成分为60%麦麸和40%蓖麻豆麸。从这个配方开始,麦麸逐渐被咖啡壳、啤酒渣、象草皮取代,豆蔻皮取代蓖麻豆皮。培养试验评估了营养成分(C、N、P、K、Ca、Mg)、pH值、电导率和发酵途径(乳酸、乙酸、丙酸、丁酸和乙醇)。温室条件下的生物测定获得了氮素有效性。此外,田间试验评估了5个配方和4个剂量(0 ~ 400 kg N ha -¹)在蔬菜连作中的农艺效率。碳氮比平衡的配方有潜力将理想的发酵和营养特性与良好的氮利用率和植物生长结合起来。有些配方彻底改变了堆肥的特性,特别是用麦麸代替咖啡壳和象草,出现了不良的发酵途径。豆粕维持了土壤的发酵品质,提高了土壤的生物活性,但降低了土壤养分含量、氮有效性和蔬菜产量。啤酒渣的发酵品质、营养成分和氮素利用率表现最为突出。添加30%的咖啡壳,其农艺性能和养分积累与标准堆肥相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Event Reduction in Localization of DES Supervisory Control Semantic Relational Extraction via Learning Syntactic Structural Representation Vehicle Tracking System using Sensor Fusion with Signal Loss Compensation Automotive Tracking System with Signal Lost Compensation Bridging the Gap: Assessing the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare for Improved Efficiency and Doctor Adaptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1