The Place of the Neighbor in Harmonium

IF 0.1 0 POETRY WALLACE STEVENS JOURNAL Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/wsj.2023.a910920
Julia Houser, Nora Pehrson, Griffin Shoglow-Rubenstein
{"title":"The Place of the Neighbor in Harmonium","authors":"Julia Houser, Nora Pehrson, Griffin Shoglow-Rubenstein","doi":"10.1353/wsj.2023.a910920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Place of the Neighbor in Harmonium Julia Houser, Nora Pehrson, and Griffin Shoglow-Rubenstein IN A 1906 JOURNAL entry, the twenty-six-year-old Wallace Stevens expressed a sentiment that would go on to become something of a commonplace in his reception both as a poet and as a literary personality: “I detest ‘company’” (L 89). But if the young Stevens’s asociality here sounds absolute, the scare quotes also indicate a possible interest in alternative notions of what company could be. Must it be human? Some fifty years later, Stevens would attest to his enduring ambivalence about his fellow humans in a letter to Robert Pack in which he reported having long considered making humanness the fourth essential feature of modern poetry: “For a long time, I have thought of adding other sections to the NOTES [i.e., ‘Notes Toward a Supreme Fiction’] and one in particular: It Must Be Human. But I think that it would be wrong not to leave well enough alone” (L 863–64). The attraction of the human was almost enough to make it as important as the other three criteria he had already elaborated: abstraction, change, and giving pleasure. But Stevens ultimately chose to leave it out. We would be mistaken, however, to view this demotion or diminution of the human as tantamount to a total rejection of sociality. Although Stevens’s poetry has often been read as a “Place of the Solitaires”—to borrow the title of a poem from Harmonium—his first volume in fact displays a multifaceted attitude toward the possibilities and prospects of intersubjective connection. From images and sounds to objects and creatures, allegories and ideas to environments and worlds, Stevens produces a vibrant ecology in which entities human and nonhuman, animate and inanimate, real and fictive commune. That communion isn’t always harmonious. “Earthy Anecdote,” the collection’s opening poem, stages a confrontation between the “bristl[ing]” antagonism of the firecat and the avoidant “swerv[ing]” of the bucks (CPP 3). The bucks continually turn this way and that, attempting to shake the firecat off, but it anticipates their reactions, coercing them into an exhausting game of evasions. A mood of hostility dominates the episode; but at the same time, a sense of cohesion and regularity emerges from the predictability of the interaction between these apparent opponents. What appears to be a confrontation turns out to be cooperative as well, taking on the aspect of a hypnotic choreography. The consistency and interdependence [End Page 230] of the animals’ movements is reflected in the poem’s neatness and organization at the level of the line. “Every time” the bucks go clattering across Oklahoma, they get diverted by the sight of the firecat bristling in their path, and the lines themselves repeatedly stop short and change course in anticipation of prepositions and conjunctions: Wherever they went,They went clattering,Until they swervedIn a swift, circular lineTo the right,Because of the firecat. (CPP 3) In the stanza that follows, Stevens recycles these last four lines, modifying only two words, to capture the symmetry and potentially infinite iterability of the bucks’ maneuvers: Or until they swervedIn a swift, circular lineTo the left,Because of the firecat. (CPP 3) Though the firecat interferes with the bucks’ activity, the poem’s rhythm and affect show this moment of discord to belong to an encompassing, cohesive whole. In the poem’s final two-line stanza, it is almost as if a spell has been broken: “Later, the firecat closed his bright eyes / And slept” (CPP 3). The spirit of perverse collaboration, of tense partnership, that has energized the poem until this point has subsided. It is also the case, though, that the solitariness and self-satisfaction of the firecat does not necessarily free it from the larger cycle; the firecat’s isolation remains poised between retreat from and reentry into this briefly constituted social world. Stevens describes the episode as an “anecdote,” and indeed the genre of the anecdote occupies a conspicuous position in Harmonium, furnishing several poems with their titles—“Anecdote of Men by the Thousand,” “Anecdote of Canna,” “Anecdote of the Prince of Peacocks,” and “Anecdote...","PeriodicalId":40622,"journal":{"name":"WALLACE STEVENS JOURNAL","volume":"181 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WALLACE STEVENS JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wsj.2023.a910920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Place of the Neighbor in Harmonium Julia Houser, Nora Pehrson, and Griffin Shoglow-Rubenstein IN A 1906 JOURNAL entry, the twenty-six-year-old Wallace Stevens expressed a sentiment that would go on to become something of a commonplace in his reception both as a poet and as a literary personality: “I detest ‘company’” (L 89). But if the young Stevens’s asociality here sounds absolute, the scare quotes also indicate a possible interest in alternative notions of what company could be. Must it be human? Some fifty years later, Stevens would attest to his enduring ambivalence about his fellow humans in a letter to Robert Pack in which he reported having long considered making humanness the fourth essential feature of modern poetry: “For a long time, I have thought of adding other sections to the NOTES [i.e., ‘Notes Toward a Supreme Fiction’] and one in particular: It Must Be Human. But I think that it would be wrong not to leave well enough alone” (L 863–64). The attraction of the human was almost enough to make it as important as the other three criteria he had already elaborated: abstraction, change, and giving pleasure. But Stevens ultimately chose to leave it out. We would be mistaken, however, to view this demotion or diminution of the human as tantamount to a total rejection of sociality. Although Stevens’s poetry has often been read as a “Place of the Solitaires”—to borrow the title of a poem from Harmonium—his first volume in fact displays a multifaceted attitude toward the possibilities and prospects of intersubjective connection. From images and sounds to objects and creatures, allegories and ideas to environments and worlds, Stevens produces a vibrant ecology in which entities human and nonhuman, animate and inanimate, real and fictive commune. That communion isn’t always harmonious. “Earthy Anecdote,” the collection’s opening poem, stages a confrontation between the “bristl[ing]” antagonism of the firecat and the avoidant “swerv[ing]” of the bucks (CPP 3). The bucks continually turn this way and that, attempting to shake the firecat off, but it anticipates their reactions, coercing them into an exhausting game of evasions. A mood of hostility dominates the episode; but at the same time, a sense of cohesion and regularity emerges from the predictability of the interaction between these apparent opponents. What appears to be a confrontation turns out to be cooperative as well, taking on the aspect of a hypnotic choreography. The consistency and interdependence [End Page 230] of the animals’ movements is reflected in the poem’s neatness and organization at the level of the line. “Every time” the bucks go clattering across Oklahoma, they get diverted by the sight of the firecat bristling in their path, and the lines themselves repeatedly stop short and change course in anticipation of prepositions and conjunctions: Wherever they went,They went clattering,Until they swervedIn a swift, circular lineTo the right,Because of the firecat. (CPP 3) In the stanza that follows, Stevens recycles these last four lines, modifying only two words, to capture the symmetry and potentially infinite iterability of the bucks’ maneuvers: Or until they swervedIn a swift, circular lineTo the left,Because of the firecat. (CPP 3) Though the firecat interferes with the bucks’ activity, the poem’s rhythm and affect show this moment of discord to belong to an encompassing, cohesive whole. In the poem’s final two-line stanza, it is almost as if a spell has been broken: “Later, the firecat closed his bright eyes / And slept” (CPP 3). The spirit of perverse collaboration, of tense partnership, that has energized the poem until this point has subsided. It is also the case, though, that the solitariness and self-satisfaction of the firecat does not necessarily free it from the larger cycle; the firecat’s isolation remains poised between retreat from and reentry into this briefly constituted social world. Stevens describes the episode as an “anecdote,” and indeed the genre of the anecdote occupies a conspicuous position in Harmonium, furnishing several poems with their titles—“Anecdote of Men by the Thousand,” “Anecdote of Canna,” “Anecdote of the Prince of Peacocks,” and “Anecdote...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
邻居在风琴中的地位
在1906年的一篇日记中,26岁的华莱士·史蒂文斯表达了一种情绪,这种情绪后来在他作为诗人和文学人物的接待中变得司空见惯:“我讨厌‘陪伴’”(L 89)。但是,如果说年轻的史蒂文斯在这里的社交性听起来是绝对的,那么这些吓人的报价也表明,他可能对公司的其他概念感兴趣。必须是人类吗?大约五十年后,史蒂文斯在给罗伯特·帕克的一封信中证明了他对人类同胞的长期矛盾心理,他在信中说,他长期以来一直认为把人性作为现代诗歌的第四个基本特征:“很长一段时间,我一直在考虑在《注释》中增加其他部分(即《致至为小说的注释》),尤其是:它必须是人性的。但我认为,如果不足够好,那将是错误的”(L 863-64)。人类的吸引力几乎足以使它与他已经详细阐述的其他三个标准一样重要:抽象、改变和给予快乐。但史蒂文斯最终选择不提这一点。然而,如果我们认为这种对人类的贬低等同于对社会性的完全拒绝,那就错了。虽然史蒂文斯的诗歌经常被解读为“纸牌的地方”——借用《和谐》中的一首诗的标题——但事实上,他的第一卷对主体间联系的可能性和前景表现出了多方面的态度。从图像和声音到物体和生物,从寓言和思想到环境和世界,史蒂文斯创造了一个充满活力的生态,在这个生态中,人类和非人类、有生命的和无生命的、真实的和虚构的共同体。这种交流并不总是和谐的。诗集的开篇诗《泥土的轶事》(Earthy轶事)上演了一场火龙“刚烈的”对抗和雄鹿逃避的“急转弯”(CPP 3)之间的对抗。雄鹿不断地转向这边,转到那一边,试图摆脱火龙,但它预料到了它们的反应,迫使它们陷入一场令人精疲力竭的逃避游戏。这一集充满敌意;但与此同时,从这些明显的对手之间互动的可预测性中产生了一种凝聚力和规律性。表面上的对抗其实也是一种合作,呈现出一种催眠的舞蹈编排。动物动作的一致性和相互依赖性(End Page 230)反映在诗的整洁和组织层面上。“每次”雄鹿“咔嗒咔嗒”地穿过俄克拉何马州时,它们都会因为看到在它们必经之路上横冲直撞的火猫而改变方向,而它们自己也会因为预料到介词和连词而反复突然停下,改变路线:无论它们走到哪里,它们都咔嗒咔嗒地走着,直到它们因为火猫而迅速转向右边,排成一条环形线。(CPP 3)在接下来的一节中,史蒂文斯重复使用了这最后四行,只修改了两个词,以捕捉雄鹿动作的对称性和潜在的无限可迭代性:或者直到它们突然转向,在一个快速的圆形线向左,因为火。(CPP 3)尽管火猫干扰了雄鹿的活动,但这首诗的节奏和影响表明,这一不和谐的时刻属于一个包容的、有凝聚力的整体。在这首诗的最后两行诗节中,仿佛一个咒语被打破了:“后来,火猫闭上了明亮的眼睛/睡着了”(CPP 3)。反常的合作精神,紧张的伙伴关系,给这首诗注入了活力,直到这一点已经消退。然而,火灾的孤独和自我满足并不一定能使它从更大的循环中解脱出来;火猫的孤立状态在退出和重新进入这个短暂构成的社会世界之间保持平衡。史蒂文斯将这一情节描述为“轶事”,事实上,轶事的类型在《和谐》中占据了显著的地位,为几首诗提供了它们的标题——“千人轶事”、“迦拿轶事”、“孔雀王子轶事”和“轶事……”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
The Teacher, and: The Old Argentine Wandering The Poems of Our Desert Climate Introduction: Stevens and Germany, Stevens in (West) Germany Stevens's "Peter Quince at the Clavier" and the Pleasures of Merely Going Round "Infinite Humble Things": Stevens and German Art of the Fin de Siècle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1