{"title":"Poetic Models of History and Time in Harmonium","authors":"Abdul-Karim Mustapha, Jonah Shallit, Jungmin Yoo","doi":"10.1353/wsj.2023.a910921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Poetic Models of History and Time in Harmonium Abdul-Karim Mustapha, Jonah Shallit, and Jungmin Yoo IN HARMONIUM, Wallace Stevens builds poetic models of history and time, juxtaposing quotidian and historical chronologies to capture the interrelations between ephemeral moments and grand narratives. Stevens thinks historically while remaining critical of history, searching across time for poetic subjects while steadfastly refusing to “play the flat historic scale” with them (CPP 11). As has been widely noted, the supposed objectivity of the historical method became the target of criticism in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In Friedrich Nietzsche’s writings, for example, the rumination of historical consciousness endangers the mere act of living (“Uses” 62), while in Hayden White’s formulation, historical telling reshapes disparate events into narratives of a completed diachronic process, necessarily sorting the stuff of life into cause and effect, significant and insignificant (6). From such a perspective, history unfolds as an encyclopedic repository of moments abstracted from mundane experiences and organized by temporal linearity. But might there be a different way to envision history? How might one give expression to everyday moments and experiences left out by grand narratives? And to what extent can poetry offer an alternative to the standard ways of interpreting history and time? Rereading Harmonium as Stevens’s attempt to wrestle with such questions, this essay explores the ways in which his poems break down the grand narrative of history and its steady, onward-moving temporality into recurring moments of ephemerality lived and felt at the level of the everyday. Stevens’s poetic imagination reconceptualizes history as an outburst of fluttering moments interwoven through an idiosyncratic temporality, and this conception of history resonates with the Nietzschean notion of eternal recurrence as well as a Paterian aesthetics that consecrates the sensuous moment. In Harmonium, Stevens presents poetry as an alternative historical method in its own right. The type of temporality that Stevens is interested in shifts attention away from linear progression and toward small moments of ephemerality, rupture, and recurrence. He terms this modality “perpetual undulation” in “The Place of the Solitaires” (CPP 47), a poem that envisions the titular site as a place saturated with a constant renewal of motions and noises following one after another. Here, renewal happens primarily as the recurrence of the same in the undulating forms of “restless iteration” (CPP 48). [End Page 236] Similar imagery reappears throughout Harmonium, as in “The Comedian as the Letter C,” where the heroic Crispin’s grand colonial ambitions slip away in the “motionless march” of chirping crickets and other mundane and pastoral rhythms (CPP 34). Stevens’s attention to these undulations of rhythmic repetition, like the “endless tread” of Rosenbloom’s mourners in “Cortège for Rosenbloom” (CPP 64), suggests a kinship with Nietzsche’s notion of eternal recurrence, or the “unconditional and infinitely repeated circular course of all things” (Ecce 273–74). Nietzschean philosophy is less interested in the completion or totality of being than in the enactment of the possibilities of beings, their multiple ways of becoming, and their endless unfolding. Nietzschean time is necessarily a matter of “aporia,” as Ned Lukacher points out (7), in that the duration of time is at once ever becoming and always already eternal. In giving poetic expression to the dual operation of time—which is ephemeral but eternal in the Nietzschean sense—Stevens acknowledges the affirmative possibility created by the vibrancy of each period of a cycle. Stevens’s invocations of time function as heuristics, guiding the reader to nonsequential, unbound, and infinite rhythms and undulations. Time, thus redefined, requires an alternative approach to history: the chronological record-keeping of grand events can no longer be an apt model to capture the nonlinear, recursive sense of time in Harmonium. The ephemeral moments that recur within the eternal cycle not only defy chronological progression but also belie the assumption that moments have to be grand in order to be recorded: the mundane or ordinary, insofar as it is ceaselessly repeated, may as well become a site of “perpetual undulation.” When Stevens condenses a “century of wind in a single puff” or finds the whole of Crispin’s remaining life “Dwindled to one sound strumming...","PeriodicalId":40622,"journal":{"name":"WALLACE STEVENS JOURNAL","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WALLACE STEVENS JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wsj.2023.a910921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Poetic Models of History and Time in Harmonium Abdul-Karim Mustapha, Jonah Shallit, and Jungmin Yoo IN HARMONIUM, Wallace Stevens builds poetic models of history and time, juxtaposing quotidian and historical chronologies to capture the interrelations between ephemeral moments and grand narratives. Stevens thinks historically while remaining critical of history, searching across time for poetic subjects while steadfastly refusing to “play the flat historic scale” with them (CPP 11). As has been widely noted, the supposed objectivity of the historical method became the target of criticism in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In Friedrich Nietzsche’s writings, for example, the rumination of historical consciousness endangers the mere act of living (“Uses” 62), while in Hayden White’s formulation, historical telling reshapes disparate events into narratives of a completed diachronic process, necessarily sorting the stuff of life into cause and effect, significant and insignificant (6). From such a perspective, history unfolds as an encyclopedic repository of moments abstracted from mundane experiences and organized by temporal linearity. But might there be a different way to envision history? How might one give expression to everyday moments and experiences left out by grand narratives? And to what extent can poetry offer an alternative to the standard ways of interpreting history and time? Rereading Harmonium as Stevens’s attempt to wrestle with such questions, this essay explores the ways in which his poems break down the grand narrative of history and its steady, onward-moving temporality into recurring moments of ephemerality lived and felt at the level of the everyday. Stevens’s poetic imagination reconceptualizes history as an outburst of fluttering moments interwoven through an idiosyncratic temporality, and this conception of history resonates with the Nietzschean notion of eternal recurrence as well as a Paterian aesthetics that consecrates the sensuous moment. In Harmonium, Stevens presents poetry as an alternative historical method in its own right. The type of temporality that Stevens is interested in shifts attention away from linear progression and toward small moments of ephemerality, rupture, and recurrence. He terms this modality “perpetual undulation” in “The Place of the Solitaires” (CPP 47), a poem that envisions the titular site as a place saturated with a constant renewal of motions and noises following one after another. Here, renewal happens primarily as the recurrence of the same in the undulating forms of “restless iteration” (CPP 48). [End Page 236] Similar imagery reappears throughout Harmonium, as in “The Comedian as the Letter C,” where the heroic Crispin’s grand colonial ambitions slip away in the “motionless march” of chirping crickets and other mundane and pastoral rhythms (CPP 34). Stevens’s attention to these undulations of rhythmic repetition, like the “endless tread” of Rosenbloom’s mourners in “Cortège for Rosenbloom” (CPP 64), suggests a kinship with Nietzsche’s notion of eternal recurrence, or the “unconditional and infinitely repeated circular course of all things” (Ecce 273–74). Nietzschean philosophy is less interested in the completion or totality of being than in the enactment of the possibilities of beings, their multiple ways of becoming, and their endless unfolding. Nietzschean time is necessarily a matter of “aporia,” as Ned Lukacher points out (7), in that the duration of time is at once ever becoming and always already eternal. In giving poetic expression to the dual operation of time—which is ephemeral but eternal in the Nietzschean sense—Stevens acknowledges the affirmative possibility created by the vibrancy of each period of a cycle. Stevens’s invocations of time function as heuristics, guiding the reader to nonsequential, unbound, and infinite rhythms and undulations. Time, thus redefined, requires an alternative approach to history: the chronological record-keeping of grand events can no longer be an apt model to capture the nonlinear, recursive sense of time in Harmonium. The ephemeral moments that recur within the eternal cycle not only defy chronological progression but also belie the assumption that moments have to be grand in order to be recorded: the mundane or ordinary, insofar as it is ceaselessly repeated, may as well become a site of “perpetual undulation.” When Stevens condenses a “century of wind in a single puff” or finds the whole of Crispin’s remaining life “Dwindled to one sound strumming...
阿卜杜勒-卡里姆·穆斯塔法、乔纳·沙利特和刘俊民在《和谐》一书中,华莱士·史蒂文斯建立了历史和时间的诗意模型,将日常生活和历史年表并列,以捕捉短暂时刻和宏大叙事之间的相互关系。史蒂文斯在对历史持批判态度的同时进行历史思考,在时间长河中寻找诗意的主题,同时坚定地拒绝用它们“演奏平坦的历史音阶”(CPP 11)。正如人们普遍注意到的那样,在19世纪末和20世纪,历史方法的所谓客观性成为了批评的目标。例如,在弗里德里希·尼采(Friedrich Nietzsche)的著作中,对历史意识的反思危及单纯的生活行为(“Uses”62),而在海登·怀特(Hayden White)的表述中,历史叙事将完全不同的事件重新塑造成一个完整的历时过程的叙事,必然将生活中的东西分类为因果、重要和无关紧要(6)。历史就像百科全书一样,从平凡的经历中抽象出来,并按时间线性组织起来。但有没有另一种看待历史的方式呢?一个人如何表达被宏大叙事遗漏的日常时刻和经历?在多大程度上,诗歌可以为解释历史和时间的标准方式提供另一种选择?重读《和谐》是史蒂文斯试图与这些问题作斗争的作品,本文探讨了他的诗歌是如何将历史的宏大叙事及其稳定、向前发展的短暂性分解为在日常生活中反复出现的短暂时刻的。史蒂文斯的诗意想象将历史重新定义为一种特殊的时间性交织在一起的飘动时刻的爆发,这种历史概念与尼采的永恒再现概念以及帕特利亚美学的共鸣,帕特利亚美学将感官时刻神圣化。在《和谐》一书中,史蒂文斯将诗歌作为一种独立的历史研究方法。史蒂文斯感兴趣的暂时性类型将注意力从线性进展转移到短暂、断裂和复发的小时刻。他在《孤独者之地》(The Place of The Solitaires, CPP 47)中将这种形态称为“永恒的波动”,这首诗将名义上的地点想象成一个充满了不断更新的运动和噪音的地方,一个接一个。在这里,更新主要发生在“不安宁迭代”的波动形式中相同的重复(CPP 48)。类似的形象在《Harmonium》中反复出现,比如在《The comedy as The Letter C》中,英勇的克里斯平(Crispin)的宏大殖民野心在蟋蟀啁啾的“静止行军”和其他世俗和田园节奏中悄然消逝(CPP 34)。史蒂文斯对这些有节奏重复的波动的关注,就像罗森布鲁姆在“为罗森布鲁姆而唱的歌”(CPP 64)中哀悼者的“无尽的脚步”,暗示了与尼采的永恒轮回概念的亲密关系,或者“所有事物的无条件和无限重复的循环过程”(Ecce 273-74)。尼采哲学对存在的完成或整体不太感兴趣,而更感兴趣的是存在的可能性的制定,它们的多种形成方式,以及它们无尽的展开。尼采的时间必然是一个“不安”的问题,正如内德·卢卡切指出的(7),因为时间的持续时间是永远的,总是永恒的。通过对时间的双重运作进行诗意的表达——在尼采的意义上,时间是短暂的,但却是永恒的——史蒂文斯承认了一个循环中每个时期的活力所创造的积极可能性。史蒂文斯对时间的召唤具有启发式的功能,引导读者进入无顺序、无约束和无限的节奏和波动。因此,重新定义的时间需要另一种历史方法:按时间顺序记录重大事件不再是捕捉《和谐》中非线性、递归时间感的合适模型。在永恒的循环中反复出现的短暂时刻,不仅违背了时间顺序,而且也相信,为了被记录,时刻必须是伟大的:平凡或普通,只要它不断地被重复,也可能成为一个“永恒波动”的场所。当史蒂文斯把“一个世纪的风浓缩在一口气”,或者发现Crispin剩下的整个生命“缩小到一个声音的弹奏……