Thought and Poetry: Essays on Romanticism, Subjectivity, and Truth by John Koethe (review)

IF 0.1 0 POETRY WALLACE STEVENS JOURNAL Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/wsj.2023.a910929
John Gibson
{"title":"Thought and Poetry: Essays on Romanticism, Subjectivity, and Truth by John Koethe (review)","authors":"John Gibson","doi":"10.1353/wsj.2023.a910929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Thought and Poetry: Essays on Romanticism, Subjectivity, and Truth by John Koethe John Gibson Thought and Poetry: Essays on Romanticism, Subjectivity, and Truth. By John Koethe. London: Bloomsbury, 2022. John Koethe is rare among philosophers. He is an accomplished poet who has also produced excellent work on issues to do with skepticism, metaphysics, and the nature of the mind and self. In other words, he has had two careers, an academic one as an analytic philosopher working on the problems that define philosophy in the Anglophone academy, and a largely extra-academic one as a poet of practice and not profession. This, he tells us, has been a healthy arrangement, since it has allowed his poetry to issue “from an impulse internal to the poetic act” rather than “from pressures external to it” (65). After reading this superb book, one is inclined to say that the same is true of his academic career, since as a philosopher he has worked largely outside the culture of professional aesthetics and philosophy of art, and one suspects that his relative indifference to the debates that animate academic work in these disciplines is in good part responsible for the immense success of Thought and Poetry. The majority of the book’s eighteen chapters were revised after publication elsewhere, and the appendix on the mind-body problem, written especially for this volume, usefully situates many of Koethe’s claims about the role of subjectivity in lyric poetry in a broader and richer philosophical context. The chapters touch on a wide range of issues in criticism, poetics, and philosophy. The most exciting discussions in the book are concerned with the legacy of romanticism and the picture of the self implicit in the strands of modernism that grow out of it; the nature of the sublime; the allure of philosophical realism; and the relationship between poetry and philosophy. While there is the kind of frequent repetition one would expect of a volume of collected essays, each retelling appears in a new context and functions to add definition to the core ideas in Koethe’s philosophy of poetry. Koethe is a Wittgensteinian at heart whose poetic sensibilities place him near the New York School and especially close to the Eliot-Stevens-Ashbery tradition. Most striking is Koethe’s view of the relationship between lyric subjectivity and the external, extra-poetic world. Koethe’s account of this relation flows from his decidedly modernist sense of the anxieties and interests of the variations of romanticism that interest him—that is, lyric poetry that involves “the enactment of subjectivity, and the affirmation of it against the claims of an objective natural setting which threatens to annihilate it” (73). It is this threat of annihilation that takes on particular significance for Koethe, since it prompts a form of lyric expression that seeks to define the self against an “objective” setting and thereby to assert a form of aesthetic and moral freedom from it. What poetic enactments of this process illuminate, at root, is the inescapability of a certain view of the self that is philosophically untenable yet so basic to our own self-conception that its dramatization alone is of value, even [End Page 253] if it rehearses an effort of thought that never pulls off the metaphysical trick it sets for itself: the actual establishment of the self as transcendent of this objective order. Such a view is dualistic, for it sees the self as distinct in ontological kind from the natural world—in effect, a purely psychological subject that animates an immaterial “interior world” of thought and feeling. As a Wittgensteinian, Koethe sees this metaphysical subject as a myth, but one that is so engrained in altogether basic features of human experience as to constitute an illusion that is a crucial aspect of how we hang together as feeling, thinking, valuing, and feeling beings: “these illusions are powerful and pervasive, engendered by systems of interpersonal, social, and political arrangements and institutions that they in turn help justify and maintain” (24). In short, this myth is essential to our concept of a person, and the form of romanticism that matters to Koethe’s poetics is one in which the...","PeriodicalId":40622,"journal":{"name":"WALLACE STEVENS JOURNAL","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WALLACE STEVENS JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wsj.2023.a910929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Thought and Poetry: Essays on Romanticism, Subjectivity, and Truth by John Koethe John Gibson Thought and Poetry: Essays on Romanticism, Subjectivity, and Truth. By John Koethe. London: Bloomsbury, 2022. John Koethe is rare among philosophers. He is an accomplished poet who has also produced excellent work on issues to do with skepticism, metaphysics, and the nature of the mind and self. In other words, he has had two careers, an academic one as an analytic philosopher working on the problems that define philosophy in the Anglophone academy, and a largely extra-academic one as a poet of practice and not profession. This, he tells us, has been a healthy arrangement, since it has allowed his poetry to issue “from an impulse internal to the poetic act” rather than “from pressures external to it” (65). After reading this superb book, one is inclined to say that the same is true of his academic career, since as a philosopher he has worked largely outside the culture of professional aesthetics and philosophy of art, and one suspects that his relative indifference to the debates that animate academic work in these disciplines is in good part responsible for the immense success of Thought and Poetry. The majority of the book’s eighteen chapters were revised after publication elsewhere, and the appendix on the mind-body problem, written especially for this volume, usefully situates many of Koethe’s claims about the role of subjectivity in lyric poetry in a broader and richer philosophical context. The chapters touch on a wide range of issues in criticism, poetics, and philosophy. The most exciting discussions in the book are concerned with the legacy of romanticism and the picture of the self implicit in the strands of modernism that grow out of it; the nature of the sublime; the allure of philosophical realism; and the relationship between poetry and philosophy. While there is the kind of frequent repetition one would expect of a volume of collected essays, each retelling appears in a new context and functions to add definition to the core ideas in Koethe’s philosophy of poetry. Koethe is a Wittgensteinian at heart whose poetic sensibilities place him near the New York School and especially close to the Eliot-Stevens-Ashbery tradition. Most striking is Koethe’s view of the relationship between lyric subjectivity and the external, extra-poetic world. Koethe’s account of this relation flows from his decidedly modernist sense of the anxieties and interests of the variations of romanticism that interest him—that is, lyric poetry that involves “the enactment of subjectivity, and the affirmation of it against the claims of an objective natural setting which threatens to annihilate it” (73). It is this threat of annihilation that takes on particular significance for Koethe, since it prompts a form of lyric expression that seeks to define the self against an “objective” setting and thereby to assert a form of aesthetic and moral freedom from it. What poetic enactments of this process illuminate, at root, is the inescapability of a certain view of the self that is philosophically untenable yet so basic to our own self-conception that its dramatization alone is of value, even [End Page 253] if it rehearses an effort of thought that never pulls off the metaphysical trick it sets for itself: the actual establishment of the self as transcendent of this objective order. Such a view is dualistic, for it sees the self as distinct in ontological kind from the natural world—in effect, a purely psychological subject that animates an immaterial “interior world” of thought and feeling. As a Wittgensteinian, Koethe sees this metaphysical subject as a myth, but one that is so engrained in altogether basic features of human experience as to constitute an illusion that is a crucial aspect of how we hang together as feeling, thinking, valuing, and feeling beings: “these illusions are powerful and pervasive, engendered by systems of interpersonal, social, and political arrangements and institutions that they in turn help justify and maintain” (24). In short, this myth is essential to our concept of a person, and the form of romanticism that matters to Koethe’s poetics is one in which the...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
思想与诗歌:约翰·歌德的浪漫主义、主体性与真理论文集(书评)
约翰·吉布森的《思想与诗歌:浪漫主义、主体性与真理》。约翰·歌德著。伦敦:布鲁姆斯伯里出版社,2022年。约翰·歌德在哲学家中是罕见的。他是一位颇有成就的诗人,在怀疑论、形而上学、心灵和自我的本质等问题上也有出色的作品。换句话说,他有两种职业,一种是学术的,作为一个分析哲学家,致力于在英语学院中定义哲学的问题,另一种是很大程度上非学术的,作为一个实践诗人,而不是职业诗人。他告诉我们,这是一种健康的安排,因为它允许他的诗歌“来自诗歌行为内部的冲动”,而不是“来自外部的压力”(65)。读过这本极好的书后,人们倾向于说,他的学术生涯也是如此,因为作为一名哲学家,他的工作在很大程度上超出了专业美学和艺术哲学的文化范围。人们怀疑,他对这些学科中活跃的学术工作的辩论相对漠不关心,这在很大程度上是《思想与诗歌》取得巨大成功的原因。在其他地方出版后,这本书的18章中的大部分都进行了修订,而专门为本卷撰写的关于身心问题的附录,有效地将歌德关于抒情诗中主体性角色的许多主张置于更广泛、更丰富的哲学背景中。章节触及广泛的问题在批评,诗学和哲学。书中最令人兴奋的讨论是关于浪漫主义的遗产,以及从中产生的现代主义中隐含的自我图景;崇高的本质;哲学现实主义的魅力;诗歌和哲学之间的关系。虽然在一卷散文集中有一种频繁的重复,但每次重述都出现在一个新的语境中,并为歌德诗歌哲学的核心思想增加了定义。歌德本质上是维特根斯坦式的,他对诗歌的敏感使他接近纽约学派,尤其接近艾略特-史蒂文斯-阿什伯里的传统。最引人注目的是歌德关于抒情主体性与外部、诗外世界之间关系的观点。歌德对这种关系的描述来自于他对浪漫主义各种变化的焦虑和兴趣的坚定的现代主义意识——也就是说,抒情诗涉及“主体性的制定,以及对主体性的肯定,反对客观自然环境的要求,这种要求威胁要消灭它”(73)。正是这种毁灭的威胁对歌德来说具有特殊的意义,因为它促使一种形式的抒情表达,寻求在“客观”的背景下定义自我,从而主张一种形式的审美和道德自由。这个过程的诗歌表演从根本上阐明的是,某种自我观点的不可逃避性,这种观点在哲学上是站不住脚的,但对我们自己的自我概念来说是如此基本,以至于它的戏剧化本身是有价值的,甚至[End Page 253],如果它排练了一种思想的努力,这种努力永远不会完成它为自己设定的形而上学技巧:自我作为超越这个客观秩序的实际建立。这种观点是二元论的,因为它认为自我在本体论上与自然世界截然不同——实际上,自我是一个纯粹的心理主体,它激活了思想和情感的非物质“内部世界”。作为维特根斯坦的信徒,歌德认为这个形而上学的主体是一个神话,但它是如此根深蒂固地存在于人类经验的基本特征中,以至于构成了一种幻觉,这种幻觉是我们作为有感觉、有思考、有价值和有感觉的人如何团结在一起的关键方面:“这些幻觉是强大而普遍的,由人际、社会和政治安排和制度系统产生,它们反过来帮助证明和维持”(24)。简而言之,这种神话对我们的人的概念至关重要,而对歌德的诗学至关重要的浪漫主义形式是……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
The Teacher, and: The Old Argentine Wandering The Poems of Our Desert Climate Introduction: Stevens and Germany, Stevens in (West) Germany Stevens's "Peter Quince at the Clavier" and the Pleasures of Merely Going Round "Infinite Humble Things": Stevens and German Art of the Fin de Siècle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1