Risk attitudes and innovation in Dutch arable farming

Q open Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1093/qopen/qoad028
Julia Höhler, Annika Tensi, Jaap Sok
{"title":"Risk attitudes and innovation in Dutch arable farming","authors":"Julia Höhler, Annika Tensi, Jaap Sok","doi":"10.1093/qopen/qoad028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract On-farm innovations have the potential to increase both agricultural productivity and income while mitigating environmental impacts. However, as adopting innovations can lead to risks, it is important to understand the role of farmers’ risk attitudes. We quantified Dutch arable farmers’ risk attitudes based on the Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT), and used the Benefit of the Doubt (BoD) approach to obtain an innovation index based on expert elicitations and adopted innovations. Subsequently, we used a Fractional Response Model to test our pre-registered hypothesis and investigate the association between the parameters of farmers’ risk attitude and farm level innovation. We find no statistically significant association between CPT parameters and the innovation index. Our results therefore cast doubts on the potential of revealed risk preferences to understand real-world behaviour.","PeriodicalId":87350,"journal":{"name":"Q open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Q open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoad028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract On-farm innovations have the potential to increase both agricultural productivity and income while mitigating environmental impacts. However, as adopting innovations can lead to risks, it is important to understand the role of farmers’ risk attitudes. We quantified Dutch arable farmers’ risk attitudes based on the Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT), and used the Benefit of the Doubt (BoD) approach to obtain an innovation index based on expert elicitations and adopted innovations. Subsequently, we used a Fractional Response Model to test our pre-registered hypothesis and investigate the association between the parameters of farmers’ risk attitude and farm level innovation. We find no statistically significant association between CPT parameters and the innovation index. Our results therefore cast doubts on the potential of revealed risk preferences to understand real-world behaviour.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰耕地农业的风险态度与创新
农场创新有可能提高农业生产力和收入,同时减轻对环境的影响。然而,由于采用创新可能导致风险,因此了解农民风险态度的作用非常重要。我们基于累积前景理论(CPT)对荷兰耕地农民的风险态度进行量化,并使用怀疑的利益(BoD)方法获得基于专家启发和采用创新的创新指数。随后,我们使用分数反应模型来检验我们的预注册假设,并研究农民风险态度参数与农场层面创新之间的关系。我们发现CPT参数与创新指数之间没有统计学上显著的关联。因此,我们的研究结果对揭示风险偏好来理解现实世界行为的潜力提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Who Can Predict Farmers’ Choices in Risky Gambles? Socioeconomic impacts of land restoration in agriculture: a systematic review Unpacking Stakeholder Perceptions on Challenges for Increasing Adoption of Solar- Powered Irrigation Systems in India: A Q Methodology Study Are lessons being learnt from the replication crisis or will the revolution devour its children? Open Q science from the editor's perspective Effects of institutional distrust on value estimates of stated preference surveys in developing countries: a choice experiment on conserving biodiversity within agricultural landscapes in a biodiversity hotspot
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1