{"title":"Czech Interwar Literature","authors":"Libor Pavera","doi":"10.55159/tri.2023.0102.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the author attempts to portray Czech interwar literature, i.e., the period from the beginning of the independent republic to its demise in September 1938 (the signing of the so-called Munich Agreement). He focuses on some necessary political and cultural-historical issues, such as the end of the “Great War”, the dissolution of Austria-Hungary, and the establishment of an independent republic. However, he pays the most attention to the form of literature (prose, poetry, and drama). In conclusion, he notes that literary life significantly diversified and branched out over the two decades. The system of literature deepened in terms of material and genre, but also in terms of ideological and ideological direction. While initially, literature and literary life were quite centralist (just like the original Austro-Hungarian Empire with its bureaucratic apparatus), over time there is a more pronounced differentiation and the emergence of new cultural centers, usually associated with larger cities. He recalls great literary figures (K. Čapek, J. Hašek, etc.) as well as authors from the circle of German-written works.","PeriodicalId":477315,"journal":{"name":"Trimarium","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trimarium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55159/tri.2023.0102.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, the author attempts to portray Czech interwar literature, i.e., the period from the beginning of the independent republic to its demise in September 1938 (the signing of the so-called Munich Agreement). He focuses on some necessary political and cultural-historical issues, such as the end of the “Great War”, the dissolution of Austria-Hungary, and the establishment of an independent republic. However, he pays the most attention to the form of literature (prose, poetry, and drama). In conclusion, he notes that literary life significantly diversified and branched out over the two decades. The system of literature deepened in terms of material and genre, but also in terms of ideological and ideological direction. While initially, literature and literary life were quite centralist (just like the original Austro-Hungarian Empire with its bureaucratic apparatus), over time there is a more pronounced differentiation and the emergence of new cultural centers, usually associated with larger cities. He recalls great literary figures (K. Čapek, J. Hašek, etc.) as well as authors from the circle of German-written works.
在这项研究中,作者试图描绘捷克两次世界大战之间的文学,即从独立共和国开始到1938年9月共和国灭亡(所谓的慕尼黑协定签署)的时期。他关注一些必要的政治和文化历史问题,如“一战”的结束、奥匈帝国的解体和独立共和国的建立。然而,他最关注的是文学形式(散文、诗歌和戏剧)。最后,他指出,在过去的二十年里,文学生活明显多样化和分支化。文学体系的深化不仅体现在材料和体裁上,也体现在思想和思想方向上。最初,文学和文学生活是相当集中的(就像最初的奥匈帝国及其官僚机构一样),随着时间的推移,出现了更明显的分化和新的文化中心,通常与大城市有关。他回忆起伟大的文学人物(K. Čapek, J. Hašek等)以及德国文学圈的作家。