Editor's Foreword: Remembering Carol Donley
求助PDF
{"title":"Editor's Foreword: Remembering Carol Donley","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/lm.2023.a911437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Editor's Foreword:Remembering Carol Donley Michael Blackie The field of Literature and Medicine has lost one of its most passionate early proponents. Carol Donley, cofounder of Hiram College's Center for Literature and Medicine and the Literature and Medicine book series published by Kent State University Press, among other remarkable achievements, died this past April from complications of Covid. I met Carol in 2008, when I joined the faculty at Hiram to teach in the Biomedical Humanities program there, the first of its kind in the US, and to participate in the Center's programming. But her influence on me as a mentor began years before, when in the Modern Language Association publication Teaching Literature and Medicine I came across a course she had codesigned and taught at Hiram called \"The Tyranny of the Normal.\"1 What an inspiring gift. I developed a course based on Carol's class that followed it closely, down to the name. But as I became more comfortable asking the kinds of questions the course modeled, and as my knowledge of the field expanded, I renamed it \"Perils of the Normal.\" I've since taught numerous permutations of the class in two baccalaureate programs and two medical schools over the last twenty years, each iteration becoming more reflective of the dynamic field Carol helped create. Another example of Carol's vision for what we now call the Health Humanities is captured in an essay she wrote for Literature and Medicine's 10th anniversary.2 Beginning by praising the journal for its analysis of healers beyond the white, heroic male physician to celebrate contributions from nursing and other allied health professions, she then puts forth a list of research topics for future work. The list is prescient. It anticipates developments in the field, like the emphasis on illness experiences as a genre and the importance of narrative, while also foreseeing the challenges of our present moment. For example, she demands that our scholarly agendas \"include more research on images of black Americans as healers and on the images of other minorities [End Page 1] in America (Native American, Hispanic, Asian American)\" (30). She provides a series of guiding questions for this work, such as \"What do healers within these groups mean to the members of the groups?\" and \"What limits do the prejudices of the majority impose on them?\" (30). Another research agenda she identifies is the essential but largely unacknowledged contributions of informal caregivers. \"We need,\" she argues, \"studies of the images of healers out in the streets and in the homes, members of the family, as often as not, who have taken on that role\" (31). These questions are as relevant today as they were in 1991 and make clear how much work remains to be done in the field—and in the pages of this journal. I came across Carol's reflective essay when I was writing my own for Literature and Medicine's 40th anniversary. Reading it reminded me of how much I've gained from her mentorship, in print and in her presence. Throughout her career, she held true to the belief that the humanities complete the health professions. I am deeply grateful for her generous wisdom, her fearless imagination, and her enduring example. Thank you, Carol. NOTES 1. Hawkins and McEntyre, Teaching Literature and Medicine; Donley and Buckley, \"Tyranny of the Normal.\" 2. Donley, \"Changing Images of Healers.\" Further references from this essay will be cited parenthetically in the text. BIBLIOGRAPHY Donley, Carol. \"Changing Images of Healers.\" Literature and Medicine 10 (1991): 18–33. Google Scholar Donley, Carol, and Sheryl Buckley. \"The Tyranny of the Normal.\" In Teaching Literature and Medicine, edited by Anne Hunsaker Hawkins and Marilyn Chandler McEntyre, 163–74. New York: Modern Language Association, 2000. Google Scholar Hawkins, Anne Hunsaker, and Marilyn Chandler McEntyre. Teaching Literature and Medicine. New York: Modern Language Association, 2000. Google Scholar Copyright © 2023 Johns Hopkins University Press","PeriodicalId":44538,"journal":{"name":"LITERATURE AND MEDICINE","volume":"199 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LITERATURE AND MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lm.2023.a911437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Editor's Foreword:Remembering Carol Donley Michael Blackie The field of Literature and Medicine has lost one of its most passionate early proponents. Carol Donley, cofounder of Hiram College's Center for Literature and Medicine and the Literature and Medicine book series published by Kent State University Press, among other remarkable achievements, died this past April from complications of Covid. I met Carol in 2008, when I joined the faculty at Hiram to teach in the Biomedical Humanities program there, the first of its kind in the US, and to participate in the Center's programming. But her influence on me as a mentor began years before, when in the Modern Language Association publication Teaching Literature and Medicine I came across a course she had codesigned and taught at Hiram called "The Tyranny of the Normal."1 What an inspiring gift. I developed a course based on Carol's class that followed it closely, down to the name. But as I became more comfortable asking the kinds of questions the course modeled, and as my knowledge of the field expanded, I renamed it "Perils of the Normal." I've since taught numerous permutations of the class in two baccalaureate programs and two medical schools over the last twenty years, each iteration becoming more reflective of the dynamic field Carol helped create. Another example of Carol's vision for what we now call the Health Humanities is captured in an essay she wrote for Literature and Medicine's 10th anniversary.2 Beginning by praising the journal for its analysis of healers beyond the white, heroic male physician to celebrate contributions from nursing and other allied health professions, she then puts forth a list of research topics for future work. The list is prescient. It anticipates developments in the field, like the emphasis on illness experiences as a genre and the importance of narrative, while also foreseeing the challenges of our present moment. For example, she demands that our scholarly agendas "include more research on images of black Americans as healers and on the images of other minorities [End Page 1] in America (Native American, Hispanic, Asian American)" (30). She provides a series of guiding questions for this work, such as "What do healers within these groups mean to the members of the groups?" and "What limits do the prejudices of the majority impose on them?" (30). Another research agenda she identifies is the essential but largely unacknowledged contributions of informal caregivers. "We need," she argues, "studies of the images of healers out in the streets and in the homes, members of the family, as often as not, who have taken on that role" (31). These questions are as relevant today as they were in 1991 and make clear how much work remains to be done in the field—and in the pages of this journal. I came across Carol's reflective essay when I was writing my own for Literature and Medicine's 40th anniversary. Reading it reminded me of how much I've gained from her mentorship, in print and in her presence. Throughout her career, she held true to the belief that the humanities complete the health professions. I am deeply grateful for her generous wisdom, her fearless imagination, and her enduring example. Thank you, Carol. NOTES 1. Hawkins and McEntyre, Teaching Literature and Medicine; Donley and Buckley, "Tyranny of the Normal." 2. Donley, "Changing Images of Healers." Further references from this essay will be cited parenthetically in the text. BIBLIOGRAPHY Donley, Carol. "Changing Images of Healers." Literature and Medicine 10 (1991): 18–33. Google Scholar Donley, Carol, and Sheryl Buckley. "The Tyranny of the Normal." In Teaching Literature and Medicine, edited by Anne Hunsaker Hawkins and Marilyn Chandler McEntyre, 163–74. New York: Modern Language Association, 2000. Google Scholar Hawkins, Anne Hunsaker, and Marilyn Chandler McEntyre. Teaching Literature and Medicine. New York: Modern Language Association, 2000. Google Scholar Copyright © 2023 Johns Hopkins University Press
编者前言:纪念卡罗尔·唐利
编者前言:纪念卡罗尔·唐利迈克尔·布莱基文学和医学领域失去了一位最热情的早期支持者。卡罗尔·唐利(Carol Donley)是海勒姆学院文学与医学中心的联合创始人,也是肯特州立大学出版社出版的文学与医学丛书的创始人之一,她在今年4月死于新冠肺炎并发症。我是在2008年认识卡罗尔的,当时我加入了海勒姆学院,在那里教授生物医学人文项目,这是美国首个此类项目,并参与了该中心的项目。但她作为导师对我的影响早在几年前就开始了,当时在现代语言协会的出版物《文学与医学教学》中,我看到了她与人合作设计并在海勒姆教授的一门课程,名为《常态的暴政》。多么鼓舞人心的礼物啊。我根据卡罗尔的课程开发了一门课程,与之密切相关,甚至连名字都是如此。但随着我越来越习惯于提出这门课程所模拟的问题,随着我对这一领域的知识的扩展,我把它改名为“正常的危险”。在过去的二十年里,我在两个学士学位课程和两所医学院教授了大量的课程排列,每次迭代都更加反映了卡罗尔帮助创建的动态领域。Carol为《文学与医学》创刊十周年所写的一篇文章中,也体现了她对我们现在所说的健康人文学科的看法她首先赞扬了该杂志对白人英雄男医生之外的治疗师的分析,以庆祝护理和其他相关医疗专业的贡献,然后提出了未来工作的研究主题清单。这份清单很有先见之明。它预测了该领域的发展,比如强调疾病经历作为一种体裁和叙事的重要性,同时也预见了我们当前面临的挑战。例如,她要求我们的学术议程“包括更多研究美国黑人作为治疗者的形象,以及美国其他少数民族的形象(美洲原住民、西班牙裔、亚裔美国人)。”(30)。她为这项工作提供了一系列指导性问题,例如“这些群体中的治疗师对群体成员意味着什么?”以及“大多数人的偏见对他们施加了什么限制?”(30)。她确定的另一个研究议程是非正式照顾者的重要贡献,但在很大程度上没有得到承认。“我们需要,”她说,“研究街头和家庭中的治疗师形象,家庭成员,往往不是,谁承担了这个角色。”这些问题在今天与1991年一样具有相关性,并明确了该领域还有多少工作要做——在本杂志的页面上。我是在为《文学与医学》40周年纪念写自己的文章时偶然发现卡罗尔的这篇反思文章的。读了这本书,我想起了我从她的指导中收获了多少,无论是在印刷品上还是在她面前。在她的整个职业生涯中,她坚持认为人文学科是健康专业的完整组成部分。我深深感激她慷慨的智慧,她无畏的想象力和她不朽的榜样。谢谢你,卡罗尔。注释1。霍金斯和麦金太尔:《文学与医学教学》;唐利和巴克利,《正常的暴政》2. Donley, <改变治疗师的形象>本文的进一步参考文献将在正文的括号内加以引用。参考书目卡罗尔·唐利。“改变治疗师的形象。”文学与医学10(1991):18-33。谷歌学者唐利,卡罗尔和谢丽尔巴克利。"正常的暴政"《文学与医学教学》,由安妮·汉萨克·霍金斯和玛丽莲·钱德勒·麦克泰尔编辑,163-74年。纽约:现代语言协会,2000。谷歌学者霍金斯,安妮·汉萨克和玛丽莲·钱德勒·麦克泰尔。文学与医学教学。纽约:现代语言协会,2000。版权所有©2023约翰霍普金斯大学出版社
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。