Dancing the Dance of Another: Allegory, the Diagram, and Suspiria (2018)

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Discourse-Journal for Theoretical Studies in Media and Culture Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1353/dis.2023.a907666
John W. Roberts
{"title":"Dancing the Dance of Another: Allegory, the Diagram, and Suspiria (2018)","authors":"John W. Roberts","doi":"10.1353/dis.2023.a907666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dancing the Dance of Another: Allegory, the Diagram, and Suspiria (2018) John W. Roberts (bio) Nothing lets me think more clearly through a problem than reading and alternating between two mysteries at the same time. —Martha Graham, Blood Memory Introduction The climax of Luca Guadagnino’s 2018 adaptation of the 1977 horror film Suspiria presents the viewer with a mystery. Suspiria’s narrative follows Susie Bannion, an American ingenue who comes to Berlin in the autumn of 1977 to audition for the renowned all-woman Markos Dance Company. Susie’s audition is impressive, and soon she is preparing to dance the lead role in the group’s upcoming performance, a visceral exploration of postwar women’s experience titled Volk. The lead choreographer, Madame Blanc, invests Susie with confidence and more: it turns out that the dance company is a cover for a coven of witches led by Mother Markos, the company’s namesake. The witches groom Susie to participate [End Page 33] in a ritual transfer of Mother Markos’s spirit from the former’s ailing body to Susie’s youthful one, giving her magical dancing power in the process; one kind of training belies another. The witches’ previous protégé, Patricia, was believed to have run off to join the Red Army Faction (RAF)—whose terrorist hijacking of Lufthansa Flight 181 and subsequent violent implosion provide a narrative backdrop against which the film’s story unfolds—but in fact became suspicious of her matrons and conveyed her misgivings about the Markos group to her psychoanalyst before her disappearance. The analyst, Josef Klemperer, is a Holocaust survivor who still visits his country home in East Germany in the hope that his wife, Anke, who disappeared during World War II, will return. Josef investigates the company and becomes convinced that something is amiss. The witches eventually capture Josef and make him a witness to their grotesque ritual, but the ritual is itself derailed by the revelation that Susie is in fact Mother Suspiriorum, an ancient witch come to exact retribution against Markos, who has usurped Suspiriorum’s occult authority. At the film’s climax, Susie/Suspiriorum kills Markos and purges the coven of her followers, followed by a denouement in which she visits Josef to apologize for his ordeal and magically erase his traumatic memories of both the ritual and his wife. The mystery of the climax involves the bait and switch between Susie and the ur-witch Suspiriorum. The viewer is left pondering whether the ritual transferal worked as intended but with the unintended consequence that it is Suspiriorum who invades Susie’s body before Markos herself can do it or whether Susie was in fact Suspiriorum all along, and her infiltration of the Markos Dance Company was just a ruse in service to this act of sabotage against Markos. The film, for its part, withholds any clear explanation of a causal sequence leading to the eruption of violence. Either way, one thing is clear: the bloodbath is precipitated by a misreading of the situation and a misrecognition of identity. While Susie’s mentor, Madame Blanc, vaguely senses that something has gone awry with the ritual, Markos fails to recognize the flaw in the ceremonial order that precipitates her own undoing and the evisceration, both symbolic and effusively literal, of the Markos group. Moreover, this misreading involves an inability to see beneath the surface of Susie’s body to recognize the occult alterity within. Indeed, the film’s culminative misrecognition is perhaps only the last in a series of slippages or displacements that structure it. Before assuming the mantle of Mother Suspiriorum (if we take Susie for having been a novitiate at the film’s beginning rather than a master in disguise), Susie mistakes the coven for nothing more than a dance company, [End Page 34] although ultimately the coven’s leadership disastrously mistakes Susie, in the end, for nothing more than a dancer. To this central narrative irony we can add the film’s play of comparisons between dance, witchcraft, and the radical terrorist politics of the RAF; actor Tilda Swinton’s triple performance as Blanc, Klemperer, and Markos; and the various ways that Guadagnino’s film displaces narrative...","PeriodicalId":40808,"journal":{"name":"Discourse-Journal for Theoretical Studies in Media and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse-Journal for Theoretical Studies in Media and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dis.2023.a907666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dancing the Dance of Another: Allegory, the Diagram, and Suspiria (2018) John W. Roberts (bio) Nothing lets me think more clearly through a problem than reading and alternating between two mysteries at the same time. —Martha Graham, Blood Memory Introduction The climax of Luca Guadagnino’s 2018 adaptation of the 1977 horror film Suspiria presents the viewer with a mystery. Suspiria’s narrative follows Susie Bannion, an American ingenue who comes to Berlin in the autumn of 1977 to audition for the renowned all-woman Markos Dance Company. Susie’s audition is impressive, and soon she is preparing to dance the lead role in the group’s upcoming performance, a visceral exploration of postwar women’s experience titled Volk. The lead choreographer, Madame Blanc, invests Susie with confidence and more: it turns out that the dance company is a cover for a coven of witches led by Mother Markos, the company’s namesake. The witches groom Susie to participate [End Page 33] in a ritual transfer of Mother Markos’s spirit from the former’s ailing body to Susie’s youthful one, giving her magical dancing power in the process; one kind of training belies another. The witches’ previous protégé, Patricia, was believed to have run off to join the Red Army Faction (RAF)—whose terrorist hijacking of Lufthansa Flight 181 and subsequent violent implosion provide a narrative backdrop against which the film’s story unfolds—but in fact became suspicious of her matrons and conveyed her misgivings about the Markos group to her psychoanalyst before her disappearance. The analyst, Josef Klemperer, is a Holocaust survivor who still visits his country home in East Germany in the hope that his wife, Anke, who disappeared during World War II, will return. Josef investigates the company and becomes convinced that something is amiss. The witches eventually capture Josef and make him a witness to their grotesque ritual, but the ritual is itself derailed by the revelation that Susie is in fact Mother Suspiriorum, an ancient witch come to exact retribution against Markos, who has usurped Suspiriorum’s occult authority. At the film’s climax, Susie/Suspiriorum kills Markos and purges the coven of her followers, followed by a denouement in which she visits Josef to apologize for his ordeal and magically erase his traumatic memories of both the ritual and his wife. The mystery of the climax involves the bait and switch between Susie and the ur-witch Suspiriorum. The viewer is left pondering whether the ritual transferal worked as intended but with the unintended consequence that it is Suspiriorum who invades Susie’s body before Markos herself can do it or whether Susie was in fact Suspiriorum all along, and her infiltration of the Markos Dance Company was just a ruse in service to this act of sabotage against Markos. The film, for its part, withholds any clear explanation of a causal sequence leading to the eruption of violence. Either way, one thing is clear: the bloodbath is precipitated by a misreading of the situation and a misrecognition of identity. While Susie’s mentor, Madame Blanc, vaguely senses that something has gone awry with the ritual, Markos fails to recognize the flaw in the ceremonial order that precipitates her own undoing and the evisceration, both symbolic and effusively literal, of the Markos group. Moreover, this misreading involves an inability to see beneath the surface of Susie’s body to recognize the occult alterity within. Indeed, the film’s culminative misrecognition is perhaps only the last in a series of slippages or displacements that structure it. Before assuming the mantle of Mother Suspiriorum (if we take Susie for having been a novitiate at the film’s beginning rather than a master in disguise), Susie mistakes the coven for nothing more than a dance company, [End Page 34] although ultimately the coven’s leadership disastrously mistakes Susie, in the end, for nothing more than a dancer. To this central narrative irony we can add the film’s play of comparisons between dance, witchcraft, and the radical terrorist politics of the RAF; actor Tilda Swinton’s triple performance as Blanc, Klemperer, and Markos; and the various ways that Guadagnino’s film displaces narrative...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《舞他人之舞:寓言、图解与幽灵》(2018)
约翰·w·罗伯茨(传记)没有什么比同时阅读和交替阅读两个谜题更能让我清晰地思考一个问题了。2018年,卢卡·瓜达格尼诺改编自1977年的恐怖电影《幽灵》,这部电影的高潮部分向观众呈现了一个谜。Suspiria的故事讲述的是1977年秋天,美国少女Susie Bannion来到柏林参加著名的女子马科斯舞蹈团的试镜。苏茜的试镜令人印象深刻,很快她就准备在即将到来的乐队表演中担任女主角,这是对战后女性经历的本能探索,名为“大众”。首席编舞布兰克夫人(Madame Blanc)给苏茜带来了信心和更多:原来这个舞蹈团是马科斯母亲(Mother Markos)领导的女巫聚会的幌子,马科斯母亲与舞蹈团同名。女巫们训练苏茜参加一个仪式,把马科斯母亲病弱的灵魂转移到苏茜年轻的身体上,在这个过程中赋予她神奇的舞蹈力量;一种训练掩盖了另一种。女巫们之前的前任前任,帕特里夏,被认为是跑去加入了红军派(RAF)——该组织恐怖劫持了汉莎航空181航班并随后发生了暴力内爆炸,为电影的故事展开提供了一个叙事背景——但事实上,帕特里夏对她的护士长产生了怀疑,并在她失踪前向她的精神分析师表达了她对马科斯集团的担忧。分析人士约瑟夫·克伦佩雷尔(Josef Klemperer)是一名大屠杀幸存者,他仍然会回到他在东德的家乡,希望他在第二次世界大战期间失踪的妻子安克(Anke)能回来。约瑟夫调查了这家公司,并确信有些事情不对劲。女巫们最终抓住了约瑟夫,让他见证了她们怪诞的仪式,但仪式本身却因为苏茜实际上是Suspiriorum的母亲而被破坏,Suspiriorum是一个古老的女巫,是为了报复篡夺了Suspiriorum的神秘权威的马科斯而来的。在影片的高潮部分,苏茜杀死了马科斯,并清洗了她的追随者,接着是一个结局,她拜访了约瑟夫,为他的折磨道歉,并神奇地抹去了他对仪式和妻子的创伤记忆。高潮的神秘之处在于苏茜和原始女巫苏斯皮里奥伦之间的诱饵和交换。观众会思考,仪式的转移是否达到了预期的效果,但却带来了意想不到的后果,即在马科斯自己能做到之前,是Suspiriorum侵入了苏茜的身体,或者苏茜实际上一直都是Suspiriorum,她对马科斯舞蹈团的渗透只是一个诡计,目的是破坏马科斯的行为。就影片本身而言,它没有对导致暴力爆发的因果关系做出任何明确的解释。不管怎样,有一件事是明确的:对形势的误读和对身份的误认促成了这场大屠杀。苏茜的导师布兰科夫人(Madame Blanc)隐约感觉到仪式出了问题,而马科斯却没有意识到仪式秩序中的缺陷,正是这种缺陷导致了她自己的毁灭,以及马科斯家族在象征意义上和饱含深情的字面意义上的被掏心。此外,这种误读涉及到无法看到苏茜身体表面下的东西,无法识别其内在的神秘变化。事实上,影片最终的误认或许只是构成它的一系列滑脱或错位中的最后一个。在继承Suspiriorum嬷嬷的衣帽之前(如果我们把苏茜看作是电影开始时的见习生,而不是伪装的大师),苏茜把女巫集会误认为只不过是一个舞蹈团,尽管最终女巫集会的领导层灾难性地把苏茜误认为只不过是一个舞者。除了这种中心叙事的讽刺,我们还可以加上电影对舞蹈、巫术和英国皇家空军激进恐怖主义政治的比较;演员蒂尔达·斯文顿(Tilda Swinton)饰演布兰科、克伦佩雷尔和马科斯的三重角色;以及瓜达格尼诺电影取代叙事的各种方式……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Embalmed Air: The Case of the Cinematic Bubble Contributors Cultivating History: Sergei Eisenstein’s The General Line and the Cinema of Agrarian Transition Spectatorship’s Scenes beside the Screen Sex, or the Illegible: AIDS Video Art and the Erotics of Abstraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1