Rethinking merit? The development of more progressive approaches to university admissions in England

Vikki Boliver, Mandy Powell
{"title":"Rethinking merit? The development of more progressive approaches to university admissions in England","authors":"Vikki Boliver, Mandy Powell","doi":"10.5456/wpll.24.3.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores how highly selective universities in England have responded to the Office for Students' call to make faster progress on widening access by 'rethinking how merit is judged in admissions' (OfS 2019: 8). Our analysis of the Access and Participation Plans (APPs) for 2020/21 to 2024/25 submitted to the Office for Students shows that England's most academically selective universities have committed to much more ambitious widening access targets than ever before. We also find that these universities have begun to articulate more structural explanations of socioeconomic inequalities in prior attainment; are making greater use of contextualised approaches to admissions; and are beginning to acknowledge the role they must play in supporting disadvantaged students to succeed at university. We argue that this represents the fragile beginnings of an important shift away from the traditional meritocratic model of admissions, in which university places go to the most highly qualified applicants irrespective of socioeconomic background, towards a more progressive model of admissions that seeks a greater degree of distributive fairness.","PeriodicalId":90763,"journal":{"name":"Widening participation and lifelong learning : the journal of the Institute for Access Studies and the European Access Network","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Widening participation and lifelong learning : the journal of the Institute for Access Studies and the European Access Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5456/wpll.24.3.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper explores how highly selective universities in England have responded to the Office for Students' call to make faster progress on widening access by 'rethinking how merit is judged in admissions' (OfS 2019: 8). Our analysis of the Access and Participation Plans (APPs) for 2020/21 to 2024/25 submitted to the Office for Students shows that England's most academically selective universities have committed to much more ambitious widening access targets than ever before. We also find that these universities have begun to articulate more structural explanations of socioeconomic inequalities in prior attainment; are making greater use of contextualised approaches to admissions; and are beginning to acknowledge the role they must play in supporting disadvantaged students to succeed at university. We argue that this represents the fragile beginnings of an important shift away from the traditional meritocratic model of admissions, in which university places go to the most highly qualified applicants irrespective of socioeconomic background, towards a more progressive model of admissions that seeks a greater degree of distributive fairness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反思价值?英国大学录取方法的进步
本文探讨了英格兰的高选择性大学如何响应学生办公室的呼吁,通过“重新思考如何在招生中判断成绩”(OfS 2019: 8)来加快扩大入学范围的进展。我们对提交给学生办公室的2020/21至2024/25年的入学和参与计划(APPs)的分析表明,英格兰最具学术选择性的大学已经承诺比以往任何时候都更加雄心勃勃的扩大入学目标。我们还发现,这些大学已经开始对先前成就的社会经济不平等进行更多的结构性解释;正在更多地利用情境化的招生方法;并且开始认识到他们在支持弱势学生在大学取得成功方面必须发挥的作用。我们认为,这代表了一种重要转变的脆弱开端,这种转变是从传统的精英录取模式转向一种寻求更大程度分配公平的更进步的录取模式。在这种模式中,大学录取录取的对象是最合格的申请人,而不考虑社会经济背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Higher education policies for applicants with criminal records in the United Kingdom: Are universities ‘banning the box’? Scientist encounters: Igniting parental aspirations to support young scientists ‐ a pilot study Editorial – general edition A typology of social equity discourses and its contribution to a wicked problem Can role models help encourage young people to apply to (selective) universities? Evidence from a large-scale English field experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1