Diagnosing Medical Score Calculator Apps

IF 3.6 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI:10.1145/3610912
Sydur Rahaman, Raina Samuel, Iulian Neamtiu
{"title":"Diagnosing Medical Score Calculator Apps","authors":"Sydur Rahaman, Raina Samuel, Iulian Neamtiu","doi":"10.1145/3610912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile medical score calculator apps are widely used among practitioners to help make decisions regarding patient treatment and diagnosis. Errors in score definition, input, or calculations can result in severe and potentially life-threatening situations. Despite these high stakes, there has been no systematic or rigorous effort to examine and verify score calculator apps. We address these issues via a novel, interval-based score checking approach. Based on our observation that medical reference tables themselves may contain errors (which can propagate to apps) we first introduce automated correctness checking of reference tables. Specifically, we reduce score correctness checking to partition checking (coverage and non-overlap) over score parameters' ranges. We checked 12 scoring systems used in emergency, intensive, and acute care. Surprisingly, though some of these scores have been used for decades, we found errors in 5 score specifications: 8 coverage violations and 3 non-overlap violations. Second, we design and implement an automatic, dynamic analysis-based approach for verifying score correctness in a given Android app; the approach combines efficient, automatic GUI extraction and app exploration with partition/consistency checking to expose app errors. We applied the approach to 90 Android apps that implement medical score calculators. We found 23 coverage violations in 11 apps; 32 non-overlap violations in 12 apps, and 16 incorrect score calculations in 16 apps. We reported all findings to developers, which so far has led to fixes in 6 apps.","PeriodicalId":20553,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3610912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mobile medical score calculator apps are widely used among practitioners to help make decisions regarding patient treatment and diagnosis. Errors in score definition, input, or calculations can result in severe and potentially life-threatening situations. Despite these high stakes, there has been no systematic or rigorous effort to examine and verify score calculator apps. We address these issues via a novel, interval-based score checking approach. Based on our observation that medical reference tables themselves may contain errors (which can propagate to apps) we first introduce automated correctness checking of reference tables. Specifically, we reduce score correctness checking to partition checking (coverage and non-overlap) over score parameters' ranges. We checked 12 scoring systems used in emergency, intensive, and acute care. Surprisingly, though some of these scores have been used for decades, we found errors in 5 score specifications: 8 coverage violations and 3 non-overlap violations. Second, we design and implement an automatic, dynamic analysis-based approach for verifying score correctness in a given Android app; the approach combines efficient, automatic GUI extraction and app exploration with partition/consistency checking to expose app errors. We applied the approach to 90 Android apps that implement medical score calculators. We found 23 coverage violations in 11 apps; 32 non-overlap violations in 12 apps, and 16 incorrect score calculations in 16 apps. We reported all findings to developers, which so far has led to fixes in 6 apps.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断医疗分数计算器应用程序
移动医疗评分计算器应用程序在从业人员中广泛使用,以帮助制定有关患者治疗和诊断的决策。分数定义、输入或计算中的错误可能导致严重甚至可能危及生命的情况。尽管赌注很高,但目前还没有系统或严格的措施来审查和验证分数计算器应用程序。我们通过一种新颖的、基于间隔的分数检查方法来解决这些问题。根据我们的观察,医学参考表本身可能包含错误(可以传播到应用程序),我们首先引入了参考表的自动正确性检查。具体来说,我们将分数正确性检查简化为分数参数范围内的分区检查(覆盖和不重叠)。我们检查了12个用于急诊、重症监护和急症护理的评分系统。令人惊讶的是,尽管这些分数中的一些已经使用了几十年,但我们在5个分数规范中发现了错误:8个覆盖违规和3个非重叠违规。其次,我们设计并实现了一种基于自动动态分析的方法来验证给定Android应用程序的分数正确性;该方法结合了高效、自动的GUI提取和应用程序探索以及分区/一致性检查来暴露应用程序错误。我们将这种方法应用于90个实现医疗分数计算器的Android应用程序。我们在11款应用中发现了23个报道违规行为;12个应用出现32次不重叠违规,16个应用出现16次不正确的分数计算。我们向开发者报告了所有发现,到目前为止已经修复了6个应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
154
期刊最新文献
Orientation-Aware 3D SLAM in Alternating Magnetic Field from Powerlines UniFi PASTEL Unobtrusive Air Leakage Estimation for Earables with In-ear Microphones PyroSense
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1