Emigration with a Pulled Handbrake: Friedrich A. Lutz's Internal Methodenstreit

IF 1.2 2区 历史学 Q3 ECONOMICS History of Political Economy Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI:10.1215/00182702-10956557
Lachezar Grudev
{"title":"Emigration with a Pulled Handbrake: Friedrich A. Lutz's Internal <i>Methodenstreit</i>","authors":"Lachezar Grudev","doi":"10.1215/00182702-10956557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reconstructs the path of the German economist Friedrich A. Lutz (1901–75) to American economics. The correspondence with his former teacher Walter Eucken, the founder of the Freiburg school, constitutes a crucial yet unexplored source for the article. Through Lutz's case, this article demonstrates the growing gulf between German and Anglo-Saxon economics during the late 1930s. In his native Germany, Lutz was trained in methodologically and institutionally focused economics, which differed fundamentally from the mathematical economics dominating Anglo-Saxon academia. He realized that an academic career in the United States would be impossible if he did not adapt to the new methods and if he did not abandon the methods of the German tradition. This gave rise to his internal Methodenstreit. After his emigration in 1938, he constantly experienced doubts and tensions because he was convinced that without considering institutions, mathematical economics could never explain the occurrence and essence of macroeconomic phenomena. Despite his stellar career at Princeton, it was only after his move to Zurich in 1953, where he taught history and theory of socioeconomics for the rest of his life, that Lutz could reconcile this internal Methodenstreit.","PeriodicalId":47043,"journal":{"name":"History of Political Economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-10956557","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article reconstructs the path of the German economist Friedrich A. Lutz (1901–75) to American economics. The correspondence with his former teacher Walter Eucken, the founder of the Freiburg school, constitutes a crucial yet unexplored source for the article. Through Lutz's case, this article demonstrates the growing gulf between German and Anglo-Saxon economics during the late 1930s. In his native Germany, Lutz was trained in methodologically and institutionally focused economics, which differed fundamentally from the mathematical economics dominating Anglo-Saxon academia. He realized that an academic career in the United States would be impossible if he did not adapt to the new methods and if he did not abandon the methods of the German tradition. This gave rise to his internal Methodenstreit. After his emigration in 1938, he constantly experienced doubts and tensions because he was convinced that without considering institutions, mathematical economics could never explain the occurrence and essence of macroeconomic phenomena. Despite his stellar career at Princeton, it was only after his move to Zurich in 1953, where he taught history and theory of socioeconomics for the rest of his life, that Lutz could reconcile this internal Methodenstreit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉着手刹的移民:弗里德里希·a·卢茨的内部方法
本文重构了德国经济学家弗里德里希·卢茨(1901 - 1975)进入美国经济学的路径。他与以前的老师、弗莱堡学派的创始人沃尔特·欧肯(Walter Eucken)的通信,构成了这篇文章的一个重要但尚未被发掘的来源。通过卢茨的案例,本文展示了20世纪30年代末德国和盎格鲁-撒克逊经济学之间日益扩大的鸿沟。在他的祖国德国,卢茨接受的是方法论和制度经济学的训练,这与主导盎格鲁-撒克逊学术界的数学经济学有着根本的不同。他意识到,如果他不适应新的方法,如果他不放弃德国传统的方法,他在美国的学术生涯是不可能的。这就引起了他内心的方法论斗争。1938年移民后,他不断感到怀疑和紧张,因为他深信,如果不考虑制度,数学经济学永远无法解释宏观经济现象的发生和本质。尽管他在普林斯顿大学有着辉煌的职业生涯,但直到1953年他搬到苏黎世,在那里他余生都在教授历史和社会经济学理论之后,卢茨才能够调和这种内在的方法论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Focusing on the history of economic thought and analysis, History of Political Economy has made significant contributions to the field and remains its foremost means of communication. In addition to book reviews, each issue contains original research on the development of economic thought, the historical background behind major figures in the history of economics, the interpretation of economic theories, and the methodologies available to historians of economic theory. All subscribers to History of Political Economy receive a hardbound annual supplement as part of their subscription.
期刊最新文献
Nineteenth-Century French Liberal Economists and Women's Work: The Dark Side of Industrialization Free Market: The History of an Idea by Jacob Soll Samuelson Friedman: The Battle over the Free Market by Nicholas Wapshott Adam Smith and Yan Fu: Western Economics in Chinese Perspective by Cheng-chung Lai Behavioral Consistency in Economics and Sociology: Thomas Schelling and Social Interactionists on Commitment, 1956–69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1