Justin A. Haegele, Steven K. Holland, Wesley J. Wilson, Anthony J. Maher, T. N. Kirk, Aaron Mason
{"title":"Universal design for learning in physical education: Overview and critical reflection","authors":"Justin A. Haegele, Steven K. Holland, Wesley J. Wilson, Anthony J. Maher, T. N. Kirk, Aaron Mason","doi":"10.1177/1356336x231202658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Universal design for learning (UDL) has been advocated for by adapted physical education scholars as a panacea to the challenges associated with teaching disabled and nondisabled students together in physical education. So much so that UDL currently occupies a privileged and largely unquestioned position in adapted physical education scholarship and practice, until now. To move scholarship forward, this article draws on published theoretical and empirical work relating to UDL generally and in physical education in particular to critically discuss the scientific research supporting, or not, the use of UDL as a so-called inclusive approach. We end this article with a call to action for scholars in this field, ourselves included, to conduct theoretically guided and empirically informed research relating to UDL in physical education, which adheres to established hallmarks of research quality that are tied to the ontological and epistemological assumptions of researchers because, at present, it is conspicuous by its absence.","PeriodicalId":47681,"journal":{"name":"European Physical Education Review","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Physical Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x231202658","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Universal design for learning (UDL) has been advocated for by adapted physical education scholars as a panacea to the challenges associated with teaching disabled and nondisabled students together in physical education. So much so that UDL currently occupies a privileged and largely unquestioned position in adapted physical education scholarship and practice, until now. To move scholarship forward, this article draws on published theoretical and empirical work relating to UDL generally and in physical education in particular to critically discuss the scientific research supporting, or not, the use of UDL as a so-called inclusive approach. We end this article with a call to action for scholars in this field, ourselves included, to conduct theoretically guided and empirically informed research relating to UDL in physical education, which adheres to established hallmarks of research quality that are tied to the ontological and epistemological assumptions of researchers because, at present, it is conspicuous by its absence.
通用学习设计(Universal design for learning, UDL)被适应性体育学者认为是解决残疾学生和非残疾学生在体育教学中共同面临的挑战的灵丹妙药。到目前为止,UDL在适应性体育学术和实践中占据着特权地位,而且在很大程度上是不容置疑的。为了推动学术发展,本文借鉴了与UDL相关的已发表的理论和实证工作,特别是在体育教育中,批判性地讨论了支持或不支持使用UDL作为所谓的包容性方法的科学研究。在本文的最后,我们呼吁包括我们在内的这一领域的学者采取行动,开展与体育教育中的UDL相关的理论指导和经验研究,这种研究坚持与研究人员的本体论和认识论假设相关的既定研究质量标志,因为目前它的缺失是显而易见的。
期刊介绍:
- Multidisciplinary Approaches: European Physical Education Review brings together contributions from a wide range of disciplines across the natural and social sciences and humanities. It includes theoretical and research-based articles and occasionally devotes Special Issues to major topics and themes within the field. - International Coverage: European Physical Education Review publishes contributions from Europe and all regions of the world, promoting international communication among scholars and professionals.