Safety and efficacy comparisons of intravenous trastuzumab biosimilars to the reference product medicine in treatment-naïve and switch-over patients with breast cancer: a systematic and meta-analysis

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI:10.1002/jppr.1882
Nina K. Song BPharm (Hons), Hala Musa BSc (Hons), MSc, MPharm, Michael Soriano BS Pharmacy (PH), Mellissa Batger BSc, MPharm, Bryson Hawkins BPharm (Hons), Iqbal Ramzan Dip Pharmacy (NZ), MSc, PhD, David E. Hibbs BSc (Hons), PhD, Grad Cert Ed (Higher Ed), Jennifer Ong BPharm (Hons), PhD, Grad Cert Ed Studies (Higher Ed)
{"title":"Safety and efficacy comparisons of intravenous trastuzumab biosimilars to the reference product medicine in treatment-naïve and switch-over patients with breast cancer: a systematic and meta-analysis","authors":"Nina K. Song BPharm (Hons),&nbsp;Hala Musa BSc (Hons), MSc, MPharm,&nbsp;Michael Soriano BS Pharmacy (PH),&nbsp;Mellissa Batger BSc, MPharm,&nbsp;Bryson Hawkins BPharm (Hons),&nbsp;Iqbal Ramzan Dip Pharmacy (NZ), MSc, PhD,&nbsp;David E. Hibbs BSc (Hons), PhD, Grad Cert Ed (Higher Ed),&nbsp;Jennifer Ong BPharm (Hons), PhD, Grad Cert Ed Studies (Higher Ed)","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab biosimilars to reference trastuzumab in patients with breast cancer. Trastuzumab, a biologic pharmaceutical product, has improved survival in hormone-oestrogen receptor 2 positive breast cancer. However, due to its high economic burden, ‘highly similar’ products known as biosimilars have been developed. Yet, concerns remain around the equivalency of efficacy and safety between biosimilars and their reference biologic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central databases were searched from inception to 26 April 2021 to obtain all randomised control trial data reporting on safety and efficacy outcomes of patients with breast cancer treated with trastuzumab biosimilars.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Selection</h3>\n \n <p>Studies were required to investigate and report on the safety and/or efficacy of trastuzumab. No restrictions were placed on study setting or intervention type and any study which reported at least one efficacy or safety outcome was included. A head-to-head comparison between the biosimilar and its reference biologic was not required for inclusion in the results. Only studies using randomised control trials were included. There was no restriction on the language the study was published in, and all abstracts, raw clinical trial data, and full-text studies were eligible.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-one studies were identified to report on patients treated with trastuzumab. The odds of achieving an overall response rate in patients treated with a trastuzumab biosimilar compared to the reference over at least 24 weeks of treatment was 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94–1.29). The proportion of patients experiencing any treatment emergent adverse events were comparable between the two study arms, 1.07 (95% CI 0.87–1.32). The switching group contained one study with 342 patients in the meta-analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Trastuzumab biosimilars have comparable efficacy and safety to reference trastuzumab in treatment-naïve patients. However, evidence is lacking for switching patients from reference trastuzumab to biosimilars, so further work is required in the switch-over population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1882","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To compare the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab biosimilars to reference trastuzumab in patients with breast cancer. Trastuzumab, a biologic pharmaceutical product, has improved survival in hormone-oestrogen receptor 2 positive breast cancer. However, due to its high economic burden, ‘highly similar’ products known as biosimilars have been developed. Yet, concerns remain around the equivalency of efficacy and safety between biosimilars and their reference biologic.

Data Sources

A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central databases were searched from inception to 26 April 2021 to obtain all randomised control trial data reporting on safety and efficacy outcomes of patients with breast cancer treated with trastuzumab biosimilars.

Study Selection

Studies were required to investigate and report on the safety and/or efficacy of trastuzumab. No restrictions were placed on study setting or intervention type and any study which reported at least one efficacy or safety outcome was included. A head-to-head comparison between the biosimilar and its reference biologic was not required for inclusion in the results. Only studies using randomised control trials were included. There was no restriction on the language the study was published in, and all abstracts, raw clinical trial data, and full-text studies were eligible.

Results

Forty-one studies were identified to report on patients treated with trastuzumab. The odds of achieving an overall response rate in patients treated with a trastuzumab biosimilar compared to the reference over at least 24 weeks of treatment was 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94–1.29). The proportion of patients experiencing any treatment emergent adverse events were comparable between the two study arms, 1.07 (95% CI 0.87–1.32). The switching group contained one study with 342 patients in the meta-analysis.

Conclusion

Trastuzumab biosimilars have comparable efficacy and safety to reference trastuzumab in treatment-naïve patients. However, evidence is lacking for switching patients from reference trastuzumab to biosimilars, so further work is required in the switch-over population.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉注射曲妥珠单抗生物仿制药与参比产品药物在乳腺癌新患者和转归患者中的安全性和疗效比较:系统和荟萃分析
目的 比较曲妥珠单抗生物仿制药与参考曲妥珠单抗对乳腺癌患者的疗效和安全性。曲妥珠单抗是一种生物制药产品,可提高激素-雌激素受体2阳性乳腺癌患者的生存率。然而,由于其经济负担较重,被称为生物仿制药的 "高度相似 "产品已被开发出来。然而,人们对生物仿制药与其参照生物制剂之间的疗效和安全性的等效性仍存在担忧。 数据来源 根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)指南进行了系统综述和元分析。检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Central 数据库,检索时间从开始到 2021 年 4 月 26 日,以获得所有报告使用曲妥珠单抗生物仿制药治疗乳腺癌患者的安全性和疗效结果的随机对照试验数据。 研究选择 要求对曲妥珠单抗的安全性和/或疗效进行调查和报告。研究环境或干预类型不受限制,任何报告了至少一项疗效或安全性结果的研究均可纳入。生物仿制药与其参照生物制剂之间的正面比较无需纳入结果。只有采用随机对照试验的研究才被纳入。研究发表的语言没有限制,所有摘要、原始临床试验数据和全文研究均符合条件。 结果 41 项研究报告了接受曲妥珠单抗治疗的患者的情况。接受曲妥珠单抗生物类似物治疗的患者在至少24周的治疗中获得总体应答率的几率为1.10(95% 置信区间[CI] 0.94-1.29)。两组研究中出现治疗突发不良事件的患者比例相当,均为1.07(95% 置信区间为0.87-1.32)。在荟萃分析中,转换组包含一项有 342 名患者的研究。 结论 曲妥珠单抗生物仿制药在治疗新药患者方面的疗效和安全性与参考曲妥珠单抗相当。然而,目前还缺乏将患者从参考曲妥珠单抗转为生物仿制药的证据,因此还需要在转换人群中开展进一步的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Person- and carer-centred palliative care: consensus for the pharmacy profession Standard of practice in women's and newborn health for pharmacy services Stability of flucytosine 100 mg/mL suspension as an alternative to intravenous administration Rise in paracetamol therapeutic errors in the community during the COVID‐19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1