Framing Entangled Borders in the Baltic States

IF 1.5 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Journal of Borderlands Studies Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1080/08865655.2023.2276475
Sandra Hagelin
{"title":"Framing Entangled Borders in the Baltic States","authors":"Sandra Hagelin","doi":"10.1080/08865655.2023.2276475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe eastern Baltic borders have become more prominent in public debates following the instrumentalized migration crisis orchestrated by Belarus in 2021. This article explores and assesses the discourses related to borders and border barriers emerging in the Baltic states in reaction to the “crisis”. Using a discourse analysis framework, the work engages with the discursive framing concerned with how to define and consolidate the border and the use of border barriers, as interpreted through media frames. The article situates the framing of borders and border barriers within geopolitical identities and the notion of entangled borders in the EU, referring to the overlapping of nation-state border regimes and the EU external border regime that occurs along the EU’s borderlands. The article finds that media frames relate to three primary discourses: increasing securitization, the Baltic states’ positionality within the EU, and the changing geopolitical space. Discourses on borders and border barriers reveal that different types of borders often entangle in each other, which, through this entanglement, contributes to how borders are constructed, conceived, and expressed.KEYWORDS: Discoursesentangled bordersidentity geopoliticsBaltic statesBelarus Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 For this study the BSR is taken to include all states geographically located around the Baltic Sea.2 The first Soviet occupation of the Baltic states in 1940 was followed by a Nazi occupation between 1941-1944, in 1944 the Baltics were recaptured and annexed into the Soviet Union.3 A recent interpretation relates the narrative of migrants to that on the language of invasive wildlife (Wilson Citation2023).4 Barbed wire that is formed into large coils, is often used for military and security purposes.","PeriodicalId":45999,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Borderlands Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Borderlands Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2023.2276475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe eastern Baltic borders have become more prominent in public debates following the instrumentalized migration crisis orchestrated by Belarus in 2021. This article explores and assesses the discourses related to borders and border barriers emerging in the Baltic states in reaction to the “crisis”. Using a discourse analysis framework, the work engages with the discursive framing concerned with how to define and consolidate the border and the use of border barriers, as interpreted through media frames. The article situates the framing of borders and border barriers within geopolitical identities and the notion of entangled borders in the EU, referring to the overlapping of nation-state border regimes and the EU external border regime that occurs along the EU’s borderlands. The article finds that media frames relate to three primary discourses: increasing securitization, the Baltic states’ positionality within the EU, and the changing geopolitical space. Discourses on borders and border barriers reveal that different types of borders often entangle in each other, which, through this entanglement, contributes to how borders are constructed, conceived, and expressed.KEYWORDS: Discoursesentangled bordersidentity geopoliticsBaltic statesBelarus Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 For this study the BSR is taken to include all states geographically located around the Baltic Sea.2 The first Soviet occupation of the Baltic states in 1940 was followed by a Nazi occupation between 1941-1944, in 1944 the Baltics were recaptured and annexed into the Soviet Union.3 A recent interpretation relates the narrative of migrants to that on the language of invasive wildlife (Wilson Citation2023).4 Barbed wire that is formed into large coils, is often used for military and security purposes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在波罗的海国家框架纠缠边界
在白俄罗斯于2021年策划的工具化移民危机之后,波罗的海东部边界在公共辩论中变得更加突出。本文探讨和评估了波罗的海国家在应对“危机”时出现的与边界和边界障碍有关的话语。使用话语分析框架,该作品涉及如何定义和巩固边界以及如何使用边界障碍的话语框架,通过媒体框架进行解释。本文将边界和边界障碍的框架置于地缘政治身份和欧盟纠缠边界的概念中,指的是民族国家边界制度和欧盟外部边界制度在欧盟边境地区发生的重叠。本文发现媒体框架与三个主要话语有关:日益增加的证券化,波罗的海国家在欧盟内的地位,以及不断变化的地缘政治空间。关于边界和边界障碍的论述表明,不同类型的边界经常相互纠缠,通过这种纠缠,有助于如何构建,构思和表达边界。关键词:话语纠缠、边界身份、地缘政治、波罗的海国家、白俄罗斯披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1在本研究中,BSR包括了地理上位于波罗的海周围的所有国家。2 1940年苏联第一次占领波罗的海国家之后,1941-1944年纳粹占领了波罗的海国家,1944年波罗的海被重新占领并并入苏联。3最近的一种解释将移民的叙述与入侵野生动物的语言联系起来(Wilson Citation2023)有刺的铁丝,形成大线圈,通常用于军事和安全目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Convergence in European Cross-Border Structures: The Case of Spanish Euroregions The inconspicuous power of border festivals: insights from the Chad-Cameroon border Migration patterns across the mediterranean exchanges, conflicts and coexistence Migration patterns across the mediterranean exchanges, conflicts and coexistence , ed. by Adelina Miranda and Antía Pérez-Caramés, 2023, Edward Elgar, Massachusetts, 222 pages, $125, ISBN: 978 1 80088 734 3 Methodological Perspectives on Smuggling: The GDL-Prussia Borderlands in the Late Eighteenth Century The e-Walls of Brexit: Digital Adjustments in Customs Programs Between France, Belgium and the United Kingdom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1