Advancing “no natural disasters” with care: risks and strategies to address disasters as political phenomena in conflict zones

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Disaster Prevention and Management Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1108/dpm-08-2023-0197
Rodrigo Mena
{"title":"Advancing “no natural disasters” with care: risks and strategies to address disasters as political phenomena in conflict zones","authors":"Rodrigo Mena","doi":"10.1108/dpm-08-2023-0197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The notion that disasters are not natural is longstanding, leading to a growing number of campaigns aimed at countering the use of the term “natural disaster.” Whilst these efforts are crucial, critical perspectives regarding the potential risks associated with this process are lacking, particularly in places affected by violent conflict. This paper aims to present a critical analysis of these efforts, highlighting the need to approach them with care. Design/methodology/approach The author draws upon insights and discussions accumulated over a decade of research into the relationship between disasters and conflict. The article includes a critical literature review on the disaster–conflict relationship and literature specifically addressing the idea that disasters are not natural. The analysis of field notes led to a second literature review covering topics such as (de) politicisation, instrumentalisation, disaster diplomacy, ethics, humanitarian principles, disaster risk reduction, peacebuilding and conflict sensitivity. Findings This analysis underscores the importance of advocating that disasters are not natural, especially in conflict-affected areas. However, an uncritical approach could lead to unintended consequences, such as exacerbating social conflicts or obstructing disaster-related actions. The article also presents alternatives to advance the understanding that disasters are not natural whilst mitigating risks, such as embracing a “do-no-harm” approach or conflict-sensitive analyses. Originality/value The author offers an innovative critical approach to advancing the understanding that disasters are not natural but socio-political. This perspective is advocated, especially in conflict-affected contexts, to address the root causes of both disasters and conflicts. The author also invites their peers and practitioners to prioritise reflective scholarship and practices, aiming to prevent the unintentional exacerbation of suffering whilst working towards its reduction.","PeriodicalId":47687,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Prevention and Management","volume":"115 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Prevention and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-08-2023-0197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The notion that disasters are not natural is longstanding, leading to a growing number of campaigns aimed at countering the use of the term “natural disaster.” Whilst these efforts are crucial, critical perspectives regarding the potential risks associated with this process are lacking, particularly in places affected by violent conflict. This paper aims to present a critical analysis of these efforts, highlighting the need to approach them with care. Design/methodology/approach The author draws upon insights and discussions accumulated over a decade of research into the relationship between disasters and conflict. The article includes a critical literature review on the disaster–conflict relationship and literature specifically addressing the idea that disasters are not natural. The analysis of field notes led to a second literature review covering topics such as (de) politicisation, instrumentalisation, disaster diplomacy, ethics, humanitarian principles, disaster risk reduction, peacebuilding and conflict sensitivity. Findings This analysis underscores the importance of advocating that disasters are not natural, especially in conflict-affected areas. However, an uncritical approach could lead to unintended consequences, such as exacerbating social conflicts or obstructing disaster-related actions. The article also presents alternatives to advance the understanding that disasters are not natural whilst mitigating risks, such as embracing a “do-no-harm” approach or conflict-sensitive analyses. Originality/value The author offers an innovative critical approach to advancing the understanding that disasters are not natural but socio-political. This perspective is advocated, especially in conflict-affected contexts, to address the root causes of both disasters and conflicts. The author also invites their peers and practitioners to prioritise reflective scholarship and practices, aiming to prevent the unintentional exacerbation of suffering whilst working towards its reduction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谨慎推进“无自然灾害”:作为冲突地区政治现象处理灾害的风险和战略
灾害不是自然造成的这一观念由来已久,导致越来越多的运动旨在反对使用“自然灾害”一词。虽然这些努力至关重要,但缺乏对与这一进程相关的潜在风险的批判性观点,特别是在受暴力冲突影响的地方。本文旨在对这些努力进行批判性分析,强调需要谨慎对待它们。设计/方法/方法作者借鉴了十多年来对灾害与冲突关系的研究所积累的见解和讨论。这篇文章包括对灾害与冲突关系的批判性文献综述,以及专门论述灾害不是自然的观点的文献。对实地记录的分析导致了第二次文献综述,涉及的主题包括(去)政治化、工具化、灾难外交、伦理、人道主义原则、减少灾害风险、建设和平和冲突敏感性。这一分析强调了倡导灾害不是自然灾害的重要性,特别是在受冲突影响的地区。然而,不加批判的做法可能导致意想不到的后果,例如加剧社会冲突或阻碍与灾害有关的行动。这篇文章还提出了在减轻风险的同时促进对灾害不是自然的理解的替代方案,例如采用“不伤害”方法或对冲突敏感的分析。原创性/价值作者提供了一种创新的批判方法,以促进对灾害不是自然的而是社会政治的理解。提倡这种观点,特别是在受冲突影响的情况下,以解决灾害和冲突的根本原因。作者还邀请他们的同行和实践者优先考虑反思的学术和实践,旨在防止无意中加剧痛苦,同时努力减少痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Disaster Prevention and Management, An International Journal, sets out to advance the available knowledge in the fields of disaster prevention and management and to act as an integrative agent for extant methodologies and activities relating to disaster emergency and crisis management. Publishing high quality, refereed papers, the journal supports the exchange of ideas, experience and practice between academics, practitioners and policy-makers.
期刊最新文献
Creative research with indigenous women: challenging marginalisation through collective spaces and livelihoods practices Punishment and survival – incarcerated persons' experiences with extreme heat in Texas prisons Facilitating the voices of people with disabilities in disaster research: a case study of participatory timeline methodologies in Sindhupalchok Nepal Reflexivity and interdisciplinarity: the reflexive journey of an interdisciplinary research team in disaster risk reduction Comparative study for underlying concepts of land acquisition during post-disaster recovery in Italy, the United States and Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1