Innovation Labs in South American Governments: Congruencies and Peculiarities

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting BAR - Brazilian Administration Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-7692bar2023220173
Alessandro Carlos da Silva Junior, Magnus Luiz Emmendoerfer
{"title":"Innovation Labs in South American Governments: Congruencies and Peculiarities","authors":"Alessandro Carlos da Silva Junior, Magnus Luiz Emmendoerfer","doi":"10.1590/1807-7692bar2023220173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to identify and characterize innovation laboratories in South American governments by employing a comprehensive and exploratory multiple-case study approach. Data were obtained from documentary and bibliographic sources, as well as through structured questionnaires containing both open and closed questions. The collected data were then classified using the content analysis technique. The findings revealed consistencies and peculiarities between the labs, corroborating the extant literature. Specifically, there is a greater prevalence of government labs with a focus on organizational aspects, particularly at the local and regional levels, compared to citizen-oriented labs. Furthermore, these labs primarily serve as educators (77.78%) and innovators/developers (72.22%), with an emphasis on improving services, administrative processes, concepts, and public policies. The presence of innovation labs can facilitate systemic changes within the public sector, enhancing its capacity to deliver efficient and effective solutions to complex problems. Lastly, the study provides an overview of its practical and academic implications, particularly when highlighting the concept of governmental innovation poverty. Additionally, the study acknowledges its inherent limitations and suggests potential avenues for future research.","PeriodicalId":53636,"journal":{"name":"BAR - Brazilian Administration Review","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BAR - Brazilian Administration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2023220173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to identify and characterize innovation laboratories in South American governments by employing a comprehensive and exploratory multiple-case study approach. Data were obtained from documentary and bibliographic sources, as well as through structured questionnaires containing both open and closed questions. The collected data were then classified using the content analysis technique. The findings revealed consistencies and peculiarities between the labs, corroborating the extant literature. Specifically, there is a greater prevalence of government labs with a focus on organizational aspects, particularly at the local and regional levels, compared to citizen-oriented labs. Furthermore, these labs primarily serve as educators (77.78%) and innovators/developers (72.22%), with an emphasis on improving services, administrative processes, concepts, and public policies. The presence of innovation labs can facilitate systemic changes within the public sector, enhancing its capacity to deliver efficient and effective solutions to complex problems. Lastly, the study provides an overview of its practical and academic implications, particularly when highlighting the concept of governmental innovation poverty. Additionally, the study acknowledges its inherent limitations and suggests potential avenues for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南美政府的创新实验室:一致性与独特性
本研究旨在通过采用综合性、探索性的多案例研究方法,识别和描述南美各国政府的创新实验室。数据是从文献和书目来源以及通过包含开放式和封闭式问题的结构化问卷获得的。然后使用内容分析技术对收集到的数据进行分类。这些发现揭示了实验室之间的一致性和特殊性,证实了现有文献。具体来说,与面向公民的实验室相比,政府实验室更注重组织方面,特别是在地方和区域层面。此外,这些实验室主要作为教育者(77.78%)和创新者/开发者(72.22%),重点是改善服务、管理流程、概念和公共政策。创新实验室的存在可以促进公共部门内部的系统性变革,增强其为复杂问题提供高效和有效解决方案的能力。最后,该研究概述了其实践和学术意义,特别是在强调政府创新贫困概念时。此外,该研究承认其固有的局限性,并提出了未来研究的潜在途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Launched in 2004, BAR has an international scope in terms of topics of interest, target audience, and editorial boards. It is an A2-journal according to the Brazilian classification Qualis/Capes, which is thus a strong signal about the quality of published works and about the transparency of the editorial process. BAR follows the editorial principles available in document Best Practices of Scientific Publication, an initiative championed by the Brazilian Academy of Management (ANPAD) that seeks to assist journals to achieve high scholarly standards and enhance their impact as sources for theoretical and applied research. Furthermore, since 2013, BAR is a member of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics), what is another signal of efforts made towards adhering to the most rigorous ethical principles in academic publication.
期刊最新文献
The Future of the Professoriate Strategic Issues: A Systematic Review of the Literature Social Innovation, Experimentalism, and Public Governance: An Ethnographical Approach to Study Public Arenas in the City Competitiveness and R&D Subsidies: The Case of the Industry 4.0 Program in Portugal Inclusion and Diversity in Companies: Premises to Maximize Quality of Life and Profitability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1