Overclaiming. An international investigation using PISA data

IF 2.7 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice Pub Date : 2023-09-14 DOI:10.1080/0969594x.2023.2238248
John Jerrim, Philip D. Parker, Nikki Shure
{"title":"Overclaiming. An international investigation using PISA data","authors":"John Jerrim, Philip D. Parker, Nikki Shure","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2023.2238248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the phenomena of overclaiming – the propensity for individuals to claim more knowledge about an issue or topic than they really (or could possibly) do. Using Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) data from nine Anglophone countries and over 40,000 young people, we examine teenagers’ propensity to claim knowledge of three mathematics constructs that do not really exist. We find substantial differences in young people’s tendency to overclaim across countries, genders, and socio-economic groups. Those who are most likely to overclaim are also found to exhibit high levels of overconfidence and believe they work hard, persevere at tasks, and are popular amongst their peers. Together this provides important new insight into overclaiming, how this differs across groups, and how it relates to other psychological constructs.","PeriodicalId":51515,"journal":{"name":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2023.2238248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper investigates the phenomena of overclaiming – the propensity for individuals to claim more knowledge about an issue or topic than they really (or could possibly) do. Using Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) data from nine Anglophone countries and over 40,000 young people, we examine teenagers’ propensity to claim knowledge of three mathematics constructs that do not really exist. We find substantial differences in young people’s tendency to overclaim across countries, genders, and socio-economic groups. Those who are most likely to overclaim are also found to exhibit high levels of overconfidence and believe they work hard, persevere at tasks, and are popular amongst their peers. Together this provides important new insight into overclaiming, how this differs across groups, and how it relates to other psychological constructs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过分的要求。一项使用PISA数据的国际调查
这篇论文调查了“夸夸其谈”的现象——个人倾向于声称对一个问题或话题的了解比他们实际(或可能)做的要多。利用来自9个英语国家和4万多名年轻人的国际学生评估项目(PISA)数据,我们研究了青少年声称掌握三种并不存在的数学结构的倾向。我们发现,不同国家、性别和社会经济群体的年轻人在过度要求的倾向上存在巨大差异。研究发现,那些最有可能夸大其词的人也表现出高度的过度自信,他们认为自己工作努力,坚持不懈,在同龄人中很受欢迎。总之,这为过度要求提供了重要的新见解,不同群体之间的差异,以及它与其他心理结构的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice
Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Recent decades have witnessed significant developments in the field of educational assessment. New approaches to the assessment of student achievement have been complemented by the increasing prominence of educational assessment as a policy issue. In particular, there has been a growth of interest in modes of assessment that promote, as well as measure, standards and quality. These have profound implications for individual learners, institutions and the educational system itself. Assessment in Education provides a focus for scholarly output in the field of assessment. The journal is explicitly international in focus and encourages contributions from a wide range of assessment systems and cultures. The journal''s intention is to explore both commonalities and differences in policy and practice.
期刊最新文献
EduSEL-R – the refined educators’ social-emotional learning questionnaire: expanded scope and improved validity Mapping oral feedback interactions in young pupils’ writing A self-feedback model (SEFEMO): secondary and higher education students’ self-assessment profiles Surprising Insights: rethinking Grades, Exams, and Assessment Cultures The conceptualisation implies the statistical model: implications for measuring domains of teaching quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1