Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Siting Sewer Treatment Plants in Muscat, Oman

IF 2.1 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Urban science (Basel, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI:10.3390/urbansci7030082
Noura Al Nasiri, Abdullah Al Fazari, Waad Ali, Boadi Agyekum, Elnazir Ramadan
{"title":"Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Siting Sewer Treatment Plants in Muscat, Oman","authors":"Noura Al Nasiri, Abdullah Al Fazari, Waad Ali, Boadi Agyekum, Elnazir Ramadan","doi":"10.3390/urbansci7030082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sewer Treatment Plants (STPs) are essential pieces of infrastructure given the growing scarcity of water sources due to the challenges of urbanization. The positioning of STPs is a complex multidimensional process that involves integrative decision-making approaches that consider multiple sustainability criteria to ensure their optimal placement. The Multi-Criteria Decision Method (MCDM) is a suite of approaches available to decision-makers when making systematic and scientifically informed decisions on siting wastewater treatment plants. Although MCDM methods have manifold applications in different geographic contexts, there is a paucity of studies employing MCDM models for the siting of STPs within the context of Oman. In this study, we assessed the locations of existing STPs and identified suitable locations for future STPs within the Muscat Governorate of Oman using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analytic Hierarchy Process (MCDM-AHP) model in a Geographic Information System (GIS) environment. Eight factors were considered in the MCDM-AHP model: slope, elevation, proximity to built-up areas, airports, valleys, road networks, the sea, parks, and golf courses. Each factor was assigned priority weights based on its importance using the AHP method. Thematic maps were generated to categorize the potential sites into different suitability levels. The results showed that the coastal areas of A’Seeb and Bowsher were the most suitable locations for STPs, representing only 1.19% of the total study area. The novelty of this study stems from the perspective of an original application within the context of Oman, which has generated novel results and interpretations. This has significant implications for urban policy and planning with respect to better informing decision-makers with a systematic framework for efficient wastewater treatment.","PeriodicalId":75284,"journal":{"name":"Urban science (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban science (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci7030082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sewer Treatment Plants (STPs) are essential pieces of infrastructure given the growing scarcity of water sources due to the challenges of urbanization. The positioning of STPs is a complex multidimensional process that involves integrative decision-making approaches that consider multiple sustainability criteria to ensure their optimal placement. The Multi-Criteria Decision Method (MCDM) is a suite of approaches available to decision-makers when making systematic and scientifically informed decisions on siting wastewater treatment plants. Although MCDM methods have manifold applications in different geographic contexts, there is a paucity of studies employing MCDM models for the siting of STPs within the context of Oman. In this study, we assessed the locations of existing STPs and identified suitable locations for future STPs within the Muscat Governorate of Oman using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analytic Hierarchy Process (MCDM-AHP) model in a Geographic Information System (GIS) environment. Eight factors were considered in the MCDM-AHP model: slope, elevation, proximity to built-up areas, airports, valleys, road networks, the sea, parks, and golf courses. Each factor was assigned priority weights based on its importance using the AHP method. Thematic maps were generated to categorize the potential sites into different suitability levels. The results showed that the coastal areas of A’Seeb and Bowsher were the most suitable locations for STPs, representing only 1.19% of the total study area. The novelty of this study stems from the perspective of an original application within the context of Oman, which has generated novel results and interpretations. This has significant implications for urban policy and planning with respect to better informing decision-makers with a systematic framework for efficient wastewater treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿曼马斯喀特污水处理厂选址的多准则决策方法
由于城市化的挑战,水资源日益稀缺,污水处理厂(STPs)是基础设施的重要组成部分。stp的定位是一个复杂的多维过程,涉及综合决策方法,考虑多种可持续性标准,以确保其最佳放置。多准则决策方法(MCDM)是决策者在对污水处理厂选址进行系统和科学决策时可用的一套方法。尽管MCDM方法在不同的地理环境中有多种应用,但在阿曼的环境中,使用MCDM模型进行stp选址的研究很少。在本研究中,我们利用地理信息系统(GIS)环境中的多标准决策层次分析法(MCDM-AHP)模型评估了阿曼马斯喀特省现有stp的位置,并确定了未来stp的合适位置。MCDM-AHP模型考虑了八个因素:坡度、海拔、靠近建成区、机场、山谷、道路网络、海洋、公园和高尔夫球场。采用层次分析法,根据各因素的重要程度为其分配优先级权重。制作专题地图,将潜在地点划分为不同的适宜程度。结果表明,A 'Seeb和Bowsher沿海地区是STPs最适宜的位置,仅占研究总面积的1.19%;这项研究的新颖性源于阿曼背景下的原始应用的角度,它产生了新的结果和解释。这对城市政策和规划具有重要意义,有助于决策者更好地了解有效废水处理的系统框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mapping Deprived Urban Areas Using Open Geospatial Data and Machine Learning in Africa Developing a Qualitative Urban Green Spaces Index Applied to a Mediterranean City Strengthening Resilient Built Environments through Human Social Capital: A Path to Post-COVID-19 Recovery The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Public Transportation System of Montevideo, Uruguay: A Urban Data Analysis Approach Sociodemographic Analysis of Disability in a Highly Depopulated Rural Region: The Case of Soria, Spain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1