The role of business culture in modelling the firm’s internal environment

Igor Arenkov, Vladimir Zyabrikov, Igor Shevazutskii
{"title":"The role of business culture in modelling the firm’s internal environment","authors":"Igor Arenkov, Vladimir Zyabrikov, Igor Shevazutskii","doi":"10.21638/spbu05.2023.306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A variety of firm’s internal environment models has been formed for about half a century, starting with S. Gibson triad (strategy — structure — systems), which first formulated the sequence of strategic planning stages, and ending with the PEST-atom model, which reflects not only the composition of the elements of internal environment, but also the relationships between them. The article shows that a modern system, which would reflect the structure of the elements of firm’s internal environment, should be built on the basis of its key element, inextricably linked to the essence of the firm and, at the same time, synchronously changing with it in the course of movement along the trajectory of the life cycle. Such element, which directly determines the degree of maturity of a firm, is its culture. Business culture is the central connecting element of the internal environment of a firm, providing a harmonious combination of all its other elements: strategy, organizational structure, motivation system, etc. and making the firm attractive for investment. At the same time the type of business culture is the main indicator of the stage of the life cycle of a firm, and since the diversity of culture types is limited to four types: the cultures of a professional, leader, bureaucrat andentrepreneur, the process of movement of a firm through the stages of its life cycle can be turned into a manageable one. In order to do this in the second half of the firm’s maturity stage the role of professional should be made dominant, and the decline stage should be transformed into the revival stage. This transition will require the transformation of the internal environment of a firm in accordance with the model of intelligent organization, which is a logical development of the concept of a self-learning organization.The paper shows that in the course of movement along the trajectory of its life cycle a firm, by ensuring innovative attractiveness and reducing operating costs per unit, consistently implements the following “chain of criteria”: innovativeness (introduction stage) — efficiency (start-up stage) — productivity (growth stage) — effectiveness (maturity stage). The possibility of applying the theoretical aspects proposed by the authors is confirmed in practice in the study of the life cycle of Rodnik LLC.","PeriodicalId":477285,"journal":{"name":"Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета","volume":"301 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2023.306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A variety of firm’s internal environment models has been formed for about half a century, starting with S. Gibson triad (strategy — structure — systems), which first formulated the sequence of strategic planning stages, and ending with the PEST-atom model, which reflects not only the composition of the elements of internal environment, but also the relationships between them. The article shows that a modern system, which would reflect the structure of the elements of firm’s internal environment, should be built on the basis of its key element, inextricably linked to the essence of the firm and, at the same time, synchronously changing with it in the course of movement along the trajectory of the life cycle. Such element, which directly determines the degree of maturity of a firm, is its culture. Business culture is the central connecting element of the internal environment of a firm, providing a harmonious combination of all its other elements: strategy, organizational structure, motivation system, etc. and making the firm attractive for investment. At the same time the type of business culture is the main indicator of the stage of the life cycle of a firm, and since the diversity of culture types is limited to four types: the cultures of a professional, leader, bureaucrat andentrepreneur, the process of movement of a firm through the stages of its life cycle can be turned into a manageable one. In order to do this in the second half of the firm’s maturity stage the role of professional should be made dominant, and the decline stage should be transformed into the revival stage. This transition will require the transformation of the internal environment of a firm in accordance with the model of intelligent organization, which is a logical development of the concept of a self-learning organization.The paper shows that in the course of movement along the trajectory of its life cycle a firm, by ensuring innovative attractiveness and reducing operating costs per unit, consistently implements the following “chain of criteria”: innovativeness (introduction stage) — efficiency (start-up stage) — productivity (growth stage) — effectiveness (maturity stage). The possibility of applying the theoretical aspects proposed by the authors is confirmed in practice in the study of the life cycle of Rodnik LLC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业文化在塑造公司内部环境中的作用
大约半个世纪以来,各种各样的企业内部环境模型已经形成,从S. Gibson triad(战略-结构-系统)开始,它首先制定了战略规划阶段的顺序,以pest -原子模型结束,它不仅反映了内部环境要素的组成,而且反映了它们之间的关系。现代企业内部环境制度应以企业内部环境要素结构为基础,与企业本质紧密相连,并在企业生命周期的运动过程中与企业本质同步变化,以反映企业内部环境要素的结构。这种直接决定企业成熟程度的因素就是企业文化。企业文化是企业内部环境的中心连接要素,是企业战略、组织结构、激励制度等要素的和谐结合,使企业对投资具有吸引力。同时,企业文化的类型是企业生命周期阶段的主要指标,由于文化类型的多样性仅限于四种类型:专业人员,领导者,官僚和企业家的文化,因此企业通过其生命周期阶段的运动过程可以变成一个可管理的过程。要在企业成熟期的后半段做到这一点,就应该使专业人员的作用发挥主导作用,把衰退期转变为复兴期。这种转变将要求企业内部环境按照智能组织的模式进行改造,这是自学习型组织概念的逻辑发展。本文表明,企业在其生命周期的运动轨迹中,通过确保创新吸引力和降低单位运营成本,始终贯彻以下“准则链”:创新性(引入阶段)-效率(启动阶段)-生产率(成长阶段)-有效性(成熟阶段)。作者提出的理论方面在罗德尼克有限责任公司生命周期研究的实践中得到了证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of the implicit Euler method for the discretization of some classes of nonlinear systems Theoretical foundation for solving search problems by the method of maximum entropy Deformation of a plane modelled by John's material with a rigid elliptical inclusion loaded by force and moment Examining the possibility of insurance contract conclusion based on utility function Microgrid control for renewable energy sources based on deep reinforcement learning and numerical optimization approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1