Resilient performance faced with a period of economic crisis: Integrated model of conceptions and research strategy

Leandro K. Rosa, Roberto F. Decourt, Daniel F. Vancin
{"title":"Resilient performance faced with a period of economic crisis: Integrated model of conceptions and research strategy","authors":"Leandro K. Rosa, Roberto F. Decourt, Daniel F. Vancin","doi":"10.1590/1678-6971/eramd230001.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose: This study seeks to design an integrated model of concepts for research on organizational resilience in a period of economic crisis and synthesize strategy for an empirical approach. Originality/value: By recognizing economic recessions as crisis events, exogenous and recurrent, that challenge the evolutionary trajectory of the business environment and the adaptive capacity of firms, this study focuses on the convergence of scientific fields to unify the business cycle with characteristics and heterogeneous business dynamics from the perspective of resilience. Design/methodology/approach: Initially, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on “business cycle management” and “organizational resilience.” Next, we used various combinations and variations of the terms “economic crisis” and “resilience,” plus “management” and “performance” to expand the base of references from publications in relevant indexes. Thus, through research by authors from different areas of knowledge, the propositions raised here are based on the comprehensive and transversal assimilation of knowledge related to the context of economic crisis and the adaptive dynamics of organizations. Findings: This study organizes and reconciles convergences of scientific fields in an integrated model of concepts for studying organizational resilience throughout business cycles and synthesizes a research strategy with three analysis segments for an empirical approach. Thus, the findings cooperate with several streams of research that focus on the adversities faced by organizations in periods of recession and provide a broad prism of analysis, with significant space to explore the linkage of attributes and actions that favor or hinder the achievement of resilient performance in the face of a period of economic crisis.","PeriodicalId":37120,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Administracao Mackenzie","volume":"273 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Administracao Mackenzie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eramd230001.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: This study seeks to design an integrated model of concepts for research on organizational resilience in a period of economic crisis and synthesize strategy for an empirical approach. Originality/value: By recognizing economic recessions as crisis events, exogenous and recurrent, that challenge the evolutionary trajectory of the business environment and the adaptive capacity of firms, this study focuses on the convergence of scientific fields to unify the business cycle with characteristics and heterogeneous business dynamics from the perspective of resilience. Design/methodology/approach: Initially, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on “business cycle management” and “organizational resilience.” Next, we used various combinations and variations of the terms “economic crisis” and “resilience,” plus “management” and “performance” to expand the base of references from publications in relevant indexes. Thus, through research by authors from different areas of knowledge, the propositions raised here are based on the comprehensive and transversal assimilation of knowledge related to the context of economic crisis and the adaptive dynamics of organizations. Findings: This study organizes and reconciles convergences of scientific fields in an integrated model of concepts for studying organizational resilience throughout business cycles and synthesizes a research strategy with three analysis segments for an empirical approach. Thus, the findings cooperate with several streams of research that focus on the adversities faced by organizations in periods of recession and provide a broad prism of analysis, with significant space to explore the linkage of attributes and actions that favor or hinder the achievement of resilient performance in the face of a period of economic crisis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济危机时期的弹性绩效:概念整合模型与研究策略
摘要目的:本研究旨在为经济危机时期的组织弹性研究设计一个整合的概念模型,并为实证方法综合策略。原创性/价值:本研究将经济衰退视为挑战商业环境演化轨迹和企业适应能力的外源性和周期性危机事件,并从弹性的角度关注科学领域的融合,以统一具有特征和异质商业动态的商业周期。设计/方法论/方法:最初,我们对“商业周期管理”和“组织弹性”的文献进行了系统的回顾。接下来,我们使用了“经济危机”和“弹性”这两个术语的各种组合和变化,加上“管理”和“绩效”,以扩大相关指标出版物的参考基础。因此,通过来自不同知识领域的作者的研究,本文提出的命题是基于与经济危机背景和组织适应性动态相关的知识的全面和横向同化。研究结果:本研究在经济周期组织弹性研究的概念整合模型中组织和协调了科学领域的趋同,并为实证方法综合了一个包含三个分析部分的研究策略。因此,这些发现与关注组织在经济衰退时期所面临的逆境的几个研究流相配合,提供了一个广泛的分析棱镜,具有重要的空间来探索在经济危机时期有利于或阻碍实现弹性绩效的属性和行为之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Administracao Mackenzie
Revista de Administracao Mackenzie Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nasalance, Nasal Airflow and Perceived Nasality in Carnatic Singers and Non-singers. Effects of resilience and managerial attitudes on the relation between participative budgeting and managerial performance Churning of human resources: A proposal for a theoretical-methodological model Behavioral training of engineering professionals and students for Industry 4.0 Sociodemographic and occupational profiles of organizational commitment in federal universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1