Waste material classification using performance evaluation of deep learning models

IF 2.1 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Journal of Intelligent Systems Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1515/jisys-2023-0064
Israa Badr Al-Mashhadani
{"title":"Waste material classification using performance evaluation of deep learning models","authors":"Israa Badr Al-Mashhadani","doi":"10.1515/jisys-2023-0064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Waste classification is the issue of sorting rubbish into valuable categories for efficient waste management. Problems arise from issues such as individual ignorance or inactivity and more overt issues like pollution in the environment, lack of resources, or a malfunctioning system. Education, established behaviors, an improved infrastructure, technology, and legislative incentives to promote effective trash sorting and management are all necessary for a solution to be implemented. For solid waste management and recycling efforts to be successful, waste materials must be sorted appropriately. This study evaluates the effectiveness of several deep learning (DL) models for the challenge of waste material classification. The focus will be on finding the best DL technique for solid waste classification. This study extensively compares several DL architectures (Resnet50, GoogleNet, InceptionV3, and Xception). Images of various types of trash are amassed and cleaned up to form a dataset. Accuracy, precision, recall, and F 1 score are only a few measures used to assess the performance of the many DL models trained and tested on this dataset. ResNet50 showed impressive performance in waste material classification, with 95% accuracy, 95.4% precision, 95% recall, and 94.8% in the F 1 score, with only two incorrect categories in the glass class. All classes are correctly classified with an F 1 score of 100% due to Inception V3’s remarkable accuracy, precision, recall, and F 1 score. Xception’s classification accuracy was excellent (100%), with a few difficulties in the glass and trash categories. With a good 90.78% precision, 100% recall, and 89.81% F 1 score, GoogleNet performed admirably. This study highlights the significance of using models based on DL for categorizing trash. The results open the way for enhanced trash sorting and recycling operations, contributing to an economically and ecologically friendly future.","PeriodicalId":46139,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligent Systems","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2023-0064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Waste classification is the issue of sorting rubbish into valuable categories for efficient waste management. Problems arise from issues such as individual ignorance or inactivity and more overt issues like pollution in the environment, lack of resources, or a malfunctioning system. Education, established behaviors, an improved infrastructure, technology, and legislative incentives to promote effective trash sorting and management are all necessary for a solution to be implemented. For solid waste management and recycling efforts to be successful, waste materials must be sorted appropriately. This study evaluates the effectiveness of several deep learning (DL) models for the challenge of waste material classification. The focus will be on finding the best DL technique for solid waste classification. This study extensively compares several DL architectures (Resnet50, GoogleNet, InceptionV3, and Xception). Images of various types of trash are amassed and cleaned up to form a dataset. Accuracy, precision, recall, and F 1 score are only a few measures used to assess the performance of the many DL models trained and tested on this dataset. ResNet50 showed impressive performance in waste material classification, with 95% accuracy, 95.4% precision, 95% recall, and 94.8% in the F 1 score, with only two incorrect categories in the glass class. All classes are correctly classified with an F 1 score of 100% due to Inception V3’s remarkable accuracy, precision, recall, and F 1 score. Xception’s classification accuracy was excellent (100%), with a few difficulties in the glass and trash categories. With a good 90.78% precision, 100% recall, and 89.81% F 1 score, GoogleNet performed admirably. This study highlights the significance of using models based on DL for categorizing trash. The results open the way for enhanced trash sorting and recycling operations, contributing to an economically and ecologically friendly future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用深度学习模型的性能评价进行废弃物分类
垃圾分类是将垃圾分类成有价值的类别,以便进行有效的垃圾管理。问题来自个人的无知或不作为,以及更明显的问题,如环境污染、资源缺乏或系统故障。教育、既定行为、改善基础设施、技术和立法激励措施,以促进有效的垃圾分类和管理,都是实施解决方案的必要条件。要使固体废物管理和回收工作取得成功,必须对废物进行适当分类。本研究评估了几种深度学习(DL)模型对废物分类挑战的有效性。重点将是寻找固体废物分类的最佳DL技术。这项研究广泛地比较了几种深度学习架构(Resnet50, GoogleNet, InceptionV3和Xception)。各种类型的垃圾图像被收集和清理,形成一个数据集。准确性、精密度、召回率和f1分数只是用来评估在该数据集上训练和测试的许多深度学习模型的性能的几个指标。ResNet50在废物分类方面表现出色,准确率为95%,精密度为95.4%,召回率为95%,f1得分为94.8%,玻璃类中只有两个分类不正确。由于Inception V3出色的准确率、精密度、召回率和f1分数,所有类都被正确分类,并获得了100%的f1分数。Xception的分类准确率非常好(100%),在玻璃和垃圾类别中有一些困难。GoogleNet的准确率为90.78%,召回率为100%,f1得分为89.81%,表现令人钦佩。本研究强调了使用基于深度学习的模型进行垃圾分类的重要性。研究结果为加强垃圾分类和回收操作开辟了道路,为经济和生态友好的未来做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intelligent Systems
Journal of Intelligent Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
77
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intelligent Systems aims to provide research and review papers, as well as Brief Communications at an interdisciplinary level, with the field of intelligent systems providing the focal point. This field includes areas like artificial intelligence, models and computational theories of human cognition, perception and motivation; brain models, artificial neural nets and neural computing. It covers contributions from the social, human and computer sciences to the analysis and application of information technology.
期刊最新文献
A study on predicting crime rates through machine learning and data mining using text A multiorder feature tracking and explanation strategy for explainable deep learning Intelligent control system for industrial robots based on multi-source data fusion Reinforcement learning with Gaussian process regression using variational free energy A novel distance vector hop localization method for wireless sensor networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1