Another Reason for CDA in Language Assessment: A Critical Synthesis from a Perspective of Validating Test Constructs

Yeon-Sook Yi
{"title":"Another Reason for CDA in Language Assessment: A Critical Synthesis from a Perspective of Validating Test Constructs","authors":"Yeon-Sook Yi","doi":"10.32038/ltrq.2023.37.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive diagnostic assessment is known for its capacity to provide detailed feedback to test-takers, which can inform instruction and guide learning. Besides this core strength of the assessment approach, the measurement procedure also works as a construct validation method in itself. Previous studies do not call attention to this aspect of cognitive diagnostic assessment and how the CDA validation can be different from existing construct validation methods. Thus, the purpose of this article is to synthesize cognitive diagnostic assessment research from a standpoint of seeing it as a construct validation procedure with a focus on its strengths as such. In doing so, the article closely examines studies that applied two earlier cognitive diagnostic models to learner data because they established the research foundations of CDA in language testing. Before looking into the details of the procedure of cognitive diagnostic assessment, the paper critically reviews non-CDA studies on construct validation in language testing. It then scrutinizes the methods and objects of construct validation in CDA research to find any significant differences. The paper concludes with several avenues of future research in CDA, which are related to the matter of verifying test constructs.","PeriodicalId":350461,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research Quarterly","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2023.37.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive diagnostic assessment is known for its capacity to provide detailed feedback to test-takers, which can inform instruction and guide learning. Besides this core strength of the assessment approach, the measurement procedure also works as a construct validation method in itself. Previous studies do not call attention to this aspect of cognitive diagnostic assessment and how the CDA validation can be different from existing construct validation methods. Thus, the purpose of this article is to synthesize cognitive diagnostic assessment research from a standpoint of seeing it as a construct validation procedure with a focus on its strengths as such. In doing so, the article closely examines studies that applied two earlier cognitive diagnostic models to learner data because they established the research foundations of CDA in language testing. Before looking into the details of the procedure of cognitive diagnostic assessment, the paper critically reviews non-CDA studies on construct validation in language testing. It then scrutinizes the methods and objects of construct validation in CDA research to find any significant differences. The paper concludes with several avenues of future research in CDA, which are related to the matter of verifying test constructs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言评价中使用批评性话语分析的另一个原因:从验证测试构念的角度进行批判性综合
认知诊断评估以其向考生提供详细反馈的能力而闻名,这可以为教学和指导学习提供信息。除了评估方法的这一核心优势之外,测量过程本身也是一种结构验证方法。以往的研究并没有注意到认知诊断评估的这一方面,以及CDA验证与现有结构验证方法的不同之处。因此,本文的目的是综合认知诊断评估研究,从一个观点来看,它是一个结构验证程序,重点是它的优势。在此过程中,本文仔细考察了将两种早期认知诊断模型应用于学习者数据的研究,因为它们为语言测试中的批评性话语分析奠定了研究基础。在探讨认知诊断评估过程的细节之前,本文批判性地回顾了语言测试中关于构式验证的非批评性话语分析研究。然后详细分析了CDA研究中结构验证的方法和对象,以发现任何显著的差异。最后,本文提出了批评性数据分析的几个未来研究方向,这些方向都与测试结构的验证问题有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“I Keep Forgetting You’re Still Alive”: Unmasking Impoliteness in the Xsphere Fostering Environmental Autonomy Support in an English Course for Middle School Learners in Western México Debriefing Teaching Strategies and Multimodal Narratives in ESL: Pedagogical Tools for Developing Agency, Making Meaning, and Confronting Racism The Scope of Second Language Teacher Education Research from 1980 to 2020: A Systematic Review The NEST/NNEST Binary and Translingual Identity of U.S.-Educated EFL Instructors in Saudi Arabia: A Study on Linguistic and Cultural Navigation in the Classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1