Competitive dynamics of lead firms and their systems suppliers in the automotive industry

Godfrey Yeung
{"title":"Competitive dynamics of lead firms and their systems suppliers in the automotive industry","authors":"Godfrey Yeung","doi":"10.1177/0308518x231202390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lead firms play a dominant role in the governance structure of conventional global production network (GPN) analyses but this framework is not fully applicable in sectors where (new) regulations, technologies and subsequent market changes have a disruptive effect on its governance structure. This paper proposes an analytical framework to examine how disruptive effects of industrial megatrends in forms of new regulations and technologies and the subsequent market changes could alter the competitive dynamics between lead firms and their tier-I suppliers. Although lead firms are becoming more specialized and highly efficient in specific product segments, they may not always have inter-firm control over their tier-I suppliers. GPN boundaries become more permeable when there is an external shock, such as new regulations or massive shifts in consumer demand, or the entrance of an entirely new lead firm, possibly due to a technological breakthrough or innovative use of existing technologies in a product. This external shock could have disruptive effects on the GPN, from the exit of current lead firms to the entrance of new tier-I suppliers or lead firms. Consequently, a reconstituted GPN with a newly established boundary is then produced. Applying the analytical framework to the automotive industry, it is argued that selected (and new) systems suppliers with expertise in micro-electronics are not only in a prime position to capture the value generated by the increasingly stringent regulatory environment on safety and environmental standards, but also more resilient than the incumbent automakers to three emerging megatrends: electrification, digitalization and autonomous driving. JEL: F23, L14, L20, L62","PeriodicalId":11906,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning A","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x231202390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lead firms play a dominant role in the governance structure of conventional global production network (GPN) analyses but this framework is not fully applicable in sectors where (new) regulations, technologies and subsequent market changes have a disruptive effect on its governance structure. This paper proposes an analytical framework to examine how disruptive effects of industrial megatrends in forms of new regulations and technologies and the subsequent market changes could alter the competitive dynamics between lead firms and their tier-I suppliers. Although lead firms are becoming more specialized and highly efficient in specific product segments, they may not always have inter-firm control over their tier-I suppliers. GPN boundaries become more permeable when there is an external shock, such as new regulations or massive shifts in consumer demand, or the entrance of an entirely new lead firm, possibly due to a technological breakthrough or innovative use of existing technologies in a product. This external shock could have disruptive effects on the GPN, from the exit of current lead firms to the entrance of new tier-I suppliers or lead firms. Consequently, a reconstituted GPN with a newly established boundary is then produced. Applying the analytical framework to the automotive industry, it is argued that selected (and new) systems suppliers with expertise in micro-electronics are not only in a prime position to capture the value generated by the increasingly stringent regulatory environment on safety and environmental standards, but also more resilient than the incumbent automakers to three emerging megatrends: electrification, digitalization and autonomous driving. JEL: F23, L14, L20, L62
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
汽车行业领先企业及其系统供应商的竞争动态
主导企业在传统的全球生产网络(GPN)治理结构分析中发挥主导作用,但这一框架并不完全适用于(新)法规、技术和随后的市场变化对其治理结构产生破坏性影响的部门。本文提出了一个分析框架,以研究新法规和新技术形式的工业大趋势的破坏性影响以及随后的市场变化如何改变领先企业与其一级供应商之间的竞争动态。虽然领先企业在特定产品领域变得更加专业化和高效,但它们可能并不总是对一级供应商拥有公司间的控制权。当存在外部冲击时,例如新的法规或消费者需求的巨大变化,或可能由于技术突破或在产品中创新地使用现有技术而进入一个全新的领先公司,GPN边界变得更具渗透性。这种外部冲击可能对GPN产生破坏性影响,从当前领先企业的退出到新的一级供应商或领先企业的进入。因此,产生一个具有新建立边界的重构GPN。将分析框架应用于汽车行业,认为具有微电子专业知识的选定(和新)系统供应商不仅在安全和环境标准日益严格的监管环境中处于有利地位,而且比现有汽车制造商更能适应三个新兴的大趋势:电气化、数字化和自动驾驶。耶利米:23、14、20、62
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Racial capitalism, uneven development, and the abstractive powers of race and money Chasing land, chasing crisis: Interrogating speculative urban development through developers’ pursuit of land commodification in Mumbai Public land, value capture, and the rise of speculative urban governance in post-crisis London Embedding the land market: Polanyi, urban planning and regulation State capacity and the ‘value’ of sustainable finance: Understanding the state-mediated rent and value production through the Seychelles Blue Bonds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1