Banking sector's reaction during the Russian invasion of Ukraine: who reacted the most?

IF 1.9 Q2 ECONOMICS JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1108/jes-04-2023-0206
Rizky Yudaruddin, Dadang Lesmana
{"title":"Banking sector's reaction during the Russian invasion of Ukraine: who reacted the most?","authors":"Rizky Yudaruddin, Dadang Lesmana","doi":"10.1108/jes-04-2023-0206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to investigate the market reaction to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, specifically in the banking sector. Design/methodology/approach The research uses an event study and cross-sectional analysis, with market reaction measured by cumulative abnormal return (CAR). The sample comprised 1,126 banks. Findings The results show that the market reacted negatively to the invasion both before and after its announcement. Developed and emerging markets saw a negative impact from the invasion, while frontier markets experienced only a slight impact. The authors also find that the banking markets of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members reacted significantly and negatively both before and after the invasion was announced. This demonstrates that the negative market reaction of NATO members was more impactful than that of other markets. Overall, this study shows that investors in the banking market are very sensitive to war. Originality/value This is the first study to provide international evidence, specifically on the banking sector's reaction during the Russian invasion of Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":47604,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES","volume":"51 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jes-04-2023-0206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the market reaction to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, specifically in the banking sector. Design/methodology/approach The research uses an event study and cross-sectional analysis, with market reaction measured by cumulative abnormal return (CAR). The sample comprised 1,126 banks. Findings The results show that the market reacted negatively to the invasion both before and after its announcement. Developed and emerging markets saw a negative impact from the invasion, while frontier markets experienced only a slight impact. The authors also find that the banking markets of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members reacted significantly and negatively both before and after the invasion was announced. This demonstrates that the negative market reaction of NATO members was more impactful than that of other markets. Overall, this study shows that investors in the banking market are very sensitive to war. Originality/value This is the first study to provide international evidence, specifically on the banking sector's reaction during the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银行业对俄罗斯入侵乌克兰的反应:谁的反应最大?
本研究旨在调查市场对俄罗斯入侵乌克兰的反应,特别是在银行业。设计/方法/方法本研究采用事件研究和横断面分析,以累积异常回报(CAR)衡量市场反应。样本包括1126家银行。研究结果表明,在该计划宣布前后,市场对该计划的反应均为负面。发达市场和新兴市场受到入侵的负面影响,而前沿市场仅受到轻微影响。作者还发现,在入侵宣布前后,北大西洋公约组织(NATO)成员国的银行市场都做出了显著的负面反应。这表明,北约成员国的负面市场反应比其他市场的影响更大。总的来说,这项研究表明,银行市场的投资者对战争非常敏感。这是第一个提供国际证据的研究,特别是关于银行业在俄罗斯入侵乌克兰期间的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Studies publishes high quality research findings and commentary on international developments in economics. The journal maintains a sound balance between economic theory and application at both the micro and the macro levels. Articles on economic issues between individual nations, emerging and evolving trading blocs are particularly welcomed. Contributors are encouraged to spell out the practical implications of their work for economists in government and industry
期刊最新文献
The impact of COVID on the rate of return to schooling among US industries Analyzing the ICT and economic growth relation in OECD countries Students’ performance and faculty efficiency. Assessing the role of gender through a metafrontier An empirical analysis of climate transition: a global outlook of agriculture productivity Is monopoly truly effective for producers?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1