Assessment of risk factors for the vertebral body kyphotic deformity progression in patients with type A1 injuries of the thoracolumbar junction

Oleksii S. Nekhlopochyn, Vadim V. Verbov, Ievgen V. Cheshuk, Milan V. Vorodi
{"title":"Assessment of risk factors for the vertebral body kyphotic deformity progression in patients with type A1 injuries of the thoracolumbar junction","authors":"Oleksii S. Nekhlopochyn, Vadim V. Verbov, Ievgen V. Cheshuk, Milan V. Vorodi","doi":"10.25305/unj.278927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More than 60% of traumatic injuries of the spine occur in the zone of the thoracolumbar junction (TLJ), and 60–75% of these fractures are of a compression nature. Type A1 injuries are characterized by the least osteo-destructive changes compared to other injuries. Traditionally, they are treated conservatively. A number of studies conducted in the last 10 years, shows a high rate of failure of conservative treatment, as evidenced by the progression of kyphotic deformity of the compressed vertebral body. Most of these publications are devoted to osteoporotic lesions in aged patients, while this aspect has been little studied in patients of working age with normal bone density. Objective: to evaluate the factors influencing the risk of kyphotic deformity progression in patients of working age with type A1 traumatic injuries of the thoracolumbar junction. Materials and methods. The analysis of clinical cases of patients who visited the outpatient department of Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute of National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine in the period from 2019 to 2022 with traumatic damage to the TLJ zone. Forty-seven victims who met the selection criteria were selected. Gender, age, body mass index, level of damage, location of the damaged endplate (caudal or cranial), bone tissue radiodensity, angular kyphotic deformity of the vertebral body, and pain intensity were considered as predictors. Depending on the presence or absence of deformity progression 2 months after the injury, the patients were divided into two clinical groups. The most clinically significant predictors were identified using the LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) regression method. Results. LASSO screening identified five potential predictors. The final logistic regression model after regularization demonstrated high predictive performance: the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.907, and the predictive accuracy was 85%. When assessing the risk of kyphotic deformity progression in traumatic injuries of type A1 of the TLJ zone, age, bone density, angular kyphotic deformity of the vertebral body, and pain intensity are of the greatest importance, demonstrating a directly proportional relationship. A compressed caudal endplate is also associated with a higher risk of post-traumatic progression of angular kyphosis. The nomogram developed using the mentioned factors makes it possible to quantify the degree of risk when choosing a therapy strategy. Conclusions. The performed analysis made it possible to create a nomogram for predicting the increase in kyphotic deformity of the vertebral body in A1 fractures of TLJ region. The proposed model can be used for a rational assessment of the risk degree when choosing the optimal tactics for treating patients.","PeriodicalId":477324,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian neurosurgical journal","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian neurosurgical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25305/unj.278927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

More than 60% of traumatic injuries of the spine occur in the zone of the thoracolumbar junction (TLJ), and 60–75% of these fractures are of a compression nature. Type A1 injuries are characterized by the least osteo-destructive changes compared to other injuries. Traditionally, they are treated conservatively. A number of studies conducted in the last 10 years, shows a high rate of failure of conservative treatment, as evidenced by the progression of kyphotic deformity of the compressed vertebral body. Most of these publications are devoted to osteoporotic lesions in aged patients, while this aspect has been little studied in patients of working age with normal bone density. Objective: to evaluate the factors influencing the risk of kyphotic deformity progression in patients of working age with type A1 traumatic injuries of the thoracolumbar junction. Materials and methods. The analysis of clinical cases of patients who visited the outpatient department of Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute of National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine in the period from 2019 to 2022 with traumatic damage to the TLJ zone. Forty-seven victims who met the selection criteria were selected. Gender, age, body mass index, level of damage, location of the damaged endplate (caudal or cranial), bone tissue radiodensity, angular kyphotic deformity of the vertebral body, and pain intensity were considered as predictors. Depending on the presence or absence of deformity progression 2 months after the injury, the patients were divided into two clinical groups. The most clinically significant predictors were identified using the LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) regression method. Results. LASSO screening identified five potential predictors. The final logistic regression model after regularization demonstrated high predictive performance: the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.907, and the predictive accuracy was 85%. When assessing the risk of kyphotic deformity progression in traumatic injuries of type A1 of the TLJ zone, age, bone density, angular kyphotic deformity of the vertebral body, and pain intensity are of the greatest importance, demonstrating a directly proportional relationship. A compressed caudal endplate is also associated with a higher risk of post-traumatic progression of angular kyphosis. The nomogram developed using the mentioned factors makes it possible to quantify the degree of risk when choosing a therapy strategy. Conclusions. The performed analysis made it possible to create a nomogram for predicting the increase in kyphotic deformity of the vertebral body in A1 fractures of TLJ region. The proposed model can be used for a rational assessment of the risk degree when choosing the optimal tactics for treating patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸腰椎交界区A1型损伤患者椎体后凸畸形进展的危险因素评估
超过60%的脊柱外伤性损伤发生在胸腰段交界处(TLJ),其中60-75%的骨折为压缩性骨折。与其他损伤相比,A1型损伤的特点是骨破坏性变化最小。传统上,他们被保守对待。在过去10年中进行的许多研究表明,保守治疗的失败率很高,压缩椎体后凸畸形的进展证明了这一点。这些文献大多是针对老年患者的骨质疏松性病变,而在骨密度正常的工作年龄患者中这方面的研究很少。目的:探讨影响工作年龄胸腰椎交界区A1型外伤性损伤患者后凸畸形进展的因素。材料和方法。分析2019 - 2022年乌克兰国家医学科学院罗莫达诺夫神经外科研究所门诊TLJ区外伤性损伤患者的临床病例。47名符合评选标准的受害者被选中。性别、年龄、体重指数、损伤程度、受损终板位置(尾侧或颅侧)、骨组织放射密度、椎体角型后凸畸形和疼痛强度被认为是预测因素。根据损伤后2个月是否存在畸形进展,将患者分为两组。使用LASSO(最小绝对收缩和选择算子)回归方法确定最具临床意义的预测因子。结果。LASSO筛选确定了五个潜在的预测因子。经正则化后的最终logistic回归模型具有较高的预测性能:ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.907,预测准确率为85%。在评估TLJ区A1型外伤性损伤后凸畸形进展的风险时,年龄、骨密度、椎体角型后凸畸形和疼痛强度是最重要的,呈现成正比关系。尾侧终板受压也与创伤后角型后凸进展的高风险相关。在选择治疗策略时,使用上述因素开发的nomogram可以量化风险程度。结论。所进行的分析可以创建一个nomogram来预测TLJ区A1骨折椎体后凸畸形的增加。该模型可用于合理评估风险程度,选择最优的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vascular injury during lumbar discectomy: risk factors, diagnosis, methods of surgical correction, features of anaesthetic management and intensive care Our experience of pediatric epilepsy surgery Peripheral nerve traction injury. Literature review Chondroblastoma of the cervical-thoracic junction: global data and own experience Own experience of using holographic neuronavigation using an augmented reality helmet in neurosurgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1