Homojen Gruplamanın Özel Yetenekli Öğrenciler Üzerindeki Etkileri: Bir Sistematik Literatür Taraması

Kadir ÇALIŞKAN, Sema TAN
{"title":"Homojen Gruplamanın Özel Yetenekli Öğrenciler Üzerindeki Etkileri: Bir Sistematik Literatür Taraması","authors":"Kadir ÇALIŞKAN, Sema TAN","doi":"10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.1117630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Homogeneous grouping strategies are among the basic interventions for gifted education. Although the academic advantages of these interventions have been frequently documented, concerns about their possible psycho-social negative effects can sometimes lead to cautious approaches to their implementation. In this regard, the main objective of the present study was determined as examining the relationship between homogeneous grouping strategies and the academic and psycho-social characteristics of gifted students. Method: The current study is a systematic literature review. Empirical resources investigating the effects of grouping strategies implemented in the formal education processes of gifted students were included in the study. Either gifted students of compulsory education age (primary, secondary, and high school) or gifted individuals whose experiences at compulsory education age were focused on were the participants of the included studies. Eighteen studies identified in line with the inclusion criteria were included in the systematic literature review. The effects of homogeneous grouping were examined under the themes of academic effects and psycho-social effects. Findings: The findings of the systematic literature review demonstrate that implementing homogeneous grouping strategies in gifted education has academically positive but psycho-socially complex (positive and/or negative or neutral) effects. Discussion: The fact that educational arrangements for characteristics that differentiate gifted students from their peers are associated with positive academic outcomes is consistent with the relevant literature. The psycho-social effects of the homogeneous grouping of gifted students are usually related to self-concept, and most of the research findings included are consistent with the big fish-little pond effect.","PeriodicalId":42594,"journal":{"name":"Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Ozel Egitim Dergisi-Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Ozel Egitim Dergisi-Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.1117630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Homogeneous grouping strategies are among the basic interventions for gifted education. Although the academic advantages of these interventions have been frequently documented, concerns about their possible psycho-social negative effects can sometimes lead to cautious approaches to their implementation. In this regard, the main objective of the present study was determined as examining the relationship between homogeneous grouping strategies and the academic and psycho-social characteristics of gifted students. Method: The current study is a systematic literature review. Empirical resources investigating the effects of grouping strategies implemented in the formal education processes of gifted students were included in the study. Either gifted students of compulsory education age (primary, secondary, and high school) or gifted individuals whose experiences at compulsory education age were focused on were the participants of the included studies. Eighteen studies identified in line with the inclusion criteria were included in the systematic literature review. The effects of homogeneous grouping were examined under the themes of academic effects and psycho-social effects. Findings: The findings of the systematic literature review demonstrate that implementing homogeneous grouping strategies in gifted education has academically positive but psycho-socially complex (positive and/or negative or neutral) effects. Discussion: The fact that educational arrangements for characteristics that differentiate gifted students from their peers are associated with positive academic outcomes is consistent with the relevant literature. The psycho-social effects of the homogeneous grouping of gifted students are usually related to self-concept, and most of the research findings included are consistent with the big fish-little pond effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同质分组对资优学生的影响:系统文献综述
同质分组策略是资优教育的基本干预措施之一。虽然这些干预措施在学术上的优势经常被记录下来,但对其可能产生的心理-社会负面影响的担忧有时会导致对其实施采取谨慎的态度。在这方面,本研究的主要目的被确定为检验同质分组策略与资优学生学业和心理社会特征之间的关系。方法:本研究采用系统文献复习法。本研究包含了调查资优学生在正规教育过程中实施分组策略效果的实证资源。被纳入研究的参与者要么是义务教育年龄段(小学、中学和高中)的资优学生,要么是被关注于义务教育年龄段的资优个体。系统文献综述纳入了18项符合纳入标准的研究。在学术效应和心理社会效应两个主题下考察同质分组的效应。结果:系统文献综述的结果表明,在资优教育中实施同质分组策略在学术上具有积极作用,但在心理社会上具有复杂的效应(积极和/或消极或中性)。讨论:将资优学生与同龄人区分开来的特征的教育安排与积极的学术成果相关联,这一事实与相关文献一致。资优学生同质分组的心理社会效应通常与自我概念有关,大多数研究结果与大鱼小塘效应一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Otizmli Bireylere Yönelik Özel Eğitim Yapılarında İç Mekân Tasarım Yaklaşımlarının İncelenmesi Perceptions of Science Teachers towards Some Concepts Related to Inclusive Education: Metaphor Study Examining the Relationship between Self-Efficacy and Cognitive Flexibility of Physical Education and Sports Teachers towards Inclusive Education Özel Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Psikolojik Sağlamlık, Öz-Yeterlik ve Algılanan Sosyal Destek Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi İşitme Engelli Öğrencilerle Çalışan Öğretmenlerin Mesleki Yeterliliklerine Yönelik Görüşlerinin Değerlendirilmesi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1