Validating cross‐modal measures for comparative research: Message veracity, novelty, and memorability

IF 8.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Psychology & Marketing Pub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI:10.1002/mar.21910
Jakob D. Jensen, Melinda M. Krakow, Katheryn R. Christy, Chelsea L. Ratcliff, Manusheela Pokharel, Helen Lillie
{"title":"Validating cross‐modal measures for comparative research: Message veracity, novelty, and memorability","authors":"Jakob D. Jensen, Melinda M. Krakow, Katheryn R. Christy, Chelsea L. Ratcliff, Manusheela Pokharel, Helen Lillie","doi":"10.1002/mar.21910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Marketing researchers are interested in the relative persuasiveness of different message modes, such as narratives and arguments. A desire to explicate and compare underlying mechanisms is central to this research, yet progress is hindered by a dearth of measures that can be used meaningfully across modes. In the current project, we identify and validate three cross‐modal message perceptions—veracity, novelty, and memorability—that can mediate the relationship between different modes and outcomes. Three studies (Study 1: N = 105; Study 2: N = 322; Study 3: N = 248) confirmed the factor structure, discriminant validity, and cross‐modal (narrative vs. argument) value of all three message perceptions. The results of this study provide researchers with three cross‐modal measures to support comparative message effects research.","PeriodicalId":48373,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Marketing","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21910","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Marketing researchers are interested in the relative persuasiveness of different message modes, such as narratives and arguments. A desire to explicate and compare underlying mechanisms is central to this research, yet progress is hindered by a dearth of measures that can be used meaningfully across modes. In the current project, we identify and validate three cross‐modal message perceptions—veracity, novelty, and memorability—that can mediate the relationship between different modes and outcomes. Three studies (Study 1: N = 105; Study 2: N = 322; Study 3: N = 248) confirmed the factor structure, discriminant validity, and cross‐modal (narrative vs. argument) value of all three message perceptions. The results of this study provide researchers with three cross‐modal measures to support comparative message effects research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证比较研究的跨模态测量:信息准确性、新颖性和可记忆性
市场营销学研究者对不同信息模式的相对说服力感兴趣,如叙述和论点。阐明和比较潜在机制的愿望是本研究的核心,但由于缺乏可以跨模式有效使用的措施,进展受到阻碍。在当前的项目中,我们确定并验证了三种跨模态信息感知——准确性、新颖性和可记忆性——它们可以调节不同模式和结果之间的关系。3项研究(研究1:N = 105;研究2:N = 322;研究3:N = 248)证实了所有三种信息感知的因素结构、区别效度和跨模态(叙述与论证)价值。本研究的结果为研究者提供了三种跨模式的方法来支持比较信息效应的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
20.90%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Psychology & Marketing (P&M) publishes original research and review articles dealing with the application of psychological theories and techniques to marketing. As an interdisciplinary journal, P&M serves practitioners and academicians in the fields of psychology and marketing and is an appropriate outlet for articles designed to be of interest, concern, and applied value to its audience of scholars and professionals. Manuscripts that use psychological theory to better understand the various aspects of the marketing of products and services are appropriate for submission.
期刊最新文献
The bittersweet of consumer–human brand relationships in the social media context Eliminating customer experience pain points in complex customer journeys through smart service solutions The purity premium effect: The asymmetrical value change around pure products When “good enough” is not good enough: How maximizing benefits financial well‐being Beyond humans: Consumer reluctance to adopt zoonotic artificial intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1