Managing Brazil’s participation in the 1970 football World Cup: meaning in the service of power

IF 0.8 4区 管理学 Q1 HISTORY Management & Organizational History Pub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI:10.1080/17449359.2023.2259878
Lídia Oliveira, Ana Caria, Helena Costa Oliveira, Janaína Almeida
{"title":"Managing Brazil’s participation in the 1970 football World Cup: meaning in the service of power","authors":"Lídia Oliveira, Ana Caria, Helena Costa Oliveira, Janaína Almeida","doi":"10.1080/17449359.2023.2259878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper focuses on the management of Brazilian participation in the 1970 FIFA World Cup in Mexico. It analyzes discourses in the press to critically discuss how power relations were combined in the construction of a consensus around the participation in the 1970 Cup, drawing on concepts of symbolic forms, power and ideology. This cup motivated a series of dramatizations of the social world, revealing relationships, values and ideologies in force and latent. Strategies of symbolic construction made use of football (as a symbol of unity, identity and collective identification) and of traditional management tools such as accounting and calculative practices to rationalize discourses and legitimate power relations. Through a holistic approach, the study contributes to understand the use of football by dominant groups in shaping society. In the economic and financial dimension, the paper also provides insights into the constitutive role of accounting by showing its contribution to establish and sustain relations of domination, and into its interlinkages with a broader popular phenomenon – football.KEYWORDS: FootballBrazilpowerideologyWorld Cup Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available on the websites of the National Digital Library of Brazil, at the link Hemeroteca Digital at https://memoria.bn.br/hdb/periodico.aspx, O Globo (Acervo) at https://oglobo.globo.com/acervo/, and Estadão (Acervo) at the https://www.estadao.com.br/acervo/.Notes1. The World Cups of 1958 and 1962 were won in a democratic context, before the military dictatorship.2. This paper builds on a broad understanding of accounting (e.g. Burchell et al. Citation1980; Carnegie, Parker, and Tsahuridu Citation2021; Hopwood Citation1994) that embraces the social and organizational context and recognizes that accounting is not only a technical practice used to report on economic activities but also a social, moral and political one. While the technical practice of accounting (the measuring, recording, summarizing and communication of information for decision-making) is important, a broader understanding of accounting goes far beyond and provides answers to the following questions: ‘what does accounting do?’, ‘what are the impacts of accounting in the world?’ and, ‘what should accounting do (or not do)?’ (see Carnegie, Parker, and Tsahuridu Citation2021). Accordingly, this implies considering that accounting has a ‘productive force’ (Miller and Power Citation2013, 558), with the capacity to intervene and impact human behavior in organizational and public life (Burchell et al. Citation1980; Hopwood Citation1994).3. This magazine is available at: https://books.google.pt/books?id=id8N64KzeLEC&hl=pt-PT&source=gbs_all_issues_r&cad=14. Brazilian football was governed by the CBD, the National Sports Confederation, founded in the 1910s. In 1941, through the issue of the Decree-Law 3.199, of April 14, sports were officially acknowledged as important tools to control society and promote the national ideals of the Estado Novo in Brazil. This Decree-Law instituted CBD’s dependence on the National Sports Council linked to the Ministry of Education and Health.5. The central argument was that the altitude, in Mexico, would influence the competitors’ performance.6. The 1970 Brazilian team has been called the best of all time and materialized the Brazilian football art (Bellos Citation2002).7. Moreira Salles provided financial support to the Instituto de Pesquisas Sociais (Institute of Social Research), created to support the conspiracy that led to the military coup (Dreifuss Citation1981; Mayer, Citationn.d.). Former Brazilian ambassador in Washington (1952–1953; 1959–1961), the banker was among the Brazilians who provided information on João Goulart’s government to the American ambassador in Rio de Janeiro (Arquivos da ditadura Citationn.d.).8. UBB was established in 1967 as a result of the expansion of Banco Moreira Salles, which took advantage of the military dictatorship’s policy of banking centralization and absorbed other banks (Mayer, Citationn.d.).9. The cruzeiro (Cr$) was the monetary standard in Brazil from 1942 to 1967, 1970 to 1986 and 1990 to 1993. From 1967 to 1970, it was temporarily replaced by the new cruzeiro (NCr$).10. The Jules Rimet Trophy was the original prize for winning the FIFA World Cup. The winning of the 1970 Cup allowed Brazil to keep the real trophy in perpetuity, as stipulated by Jules Rimet in 1930.11. Alongside other multinational corporations operating in Brazil, Shell provided financial support to Instituto Brasileiro de Ação Democrática (IBAD) which acted as a conduit for multinational funds directed to IPES (Dreifuss Citation1981).12. The Maracanazo, deeply etched into football history, refers to Brazil’s defeat against Uruguay in the decisive match of the 1950 FIFA World Cup. This historic event took place at Rio de Janeiro’s Maracanã Stadium. The term encapsulates the profound shock and disbelief that swept over the Brazilian nation when Uruguay secured the victory. Brazil, as the host nation, held high hopes and an almost palpable sense of anticipation for a triumphant outcome. However, Uruguay’s unexpected 2–1 win shattered these expectations, leaving an enduring imprint on Brazil’s footballing legacy. The Maracanazo represents a pivotal moment that transcended mere sports. The profound sense of loss and the ensuing national identity crisis left an indelible mark on the writings of José Lins do Rego, Mário Filho and Nelson Rodrigues, collectively contributing to the understanding of the event’s lasting significance in Brazilian memory (Antunes Citation2004). Mario Filho, for example, chronicled the tragedy, describing the stunned silence that enveloped the stadium as Uruguay scored. He emphasized the profound impact of the defeat on the collective Brazilian psyche (e.g. Filho Citation1950). Nelson Rodrigues added a layer of theatricality and introspection to the event, exploring the psychological complexities of the Brazilian players, the expectations placed upon them, and the ultimate heartbreak that unfolded. His writings revealed the intertwining of sports and human emotion, using the Maracanazo as a canvas to explore deeper existential themes (e.g. Rodrigues Citation1993).13. This relates to the ‘mutt complex’, a term coined in 1958 by Nelson Rodrigues. The ‘mutt complex’ is the voluntary sense of inferiority that Brazilians impose upon themselves in comparison to the rest of the world, stemming from Brazil’s defeat in the 1950 World Cup final (Rodrigues Citation1993). To Rodrigues (Citation1993, 62), it is ‘a matter of self-belief. Brazilians need to convince themselves that they are not “mutts” and that they have football prowess to spare.’Additional informationNotes on contributorsLídia OliveiraLídia Oliveira Ph.D. in Business Administration, is a Professor of Accounting at the School of Economics and Management, University of Minho, Portugal. Her research engages with accounting and accountability, financial and non-financial reporting and corporate communication.Ana CariaAna Caria Ph.D. in Business Administration, is a Professor of Accounting at the School of Economics and Management, University of Minho, Portugal. Her research engages with accounting and accountability in diverse settings, with financial and sustainability reporting, corporate communication and accounting history.Helena Costa OliveiraHelena Costa Oliveira Ph.D. in Accounting, is a Professor of Accounting at the Porto Accounting and Business School, Polytechnic of Porto, Portugal. Her research engages with management accounting, institutional logics and healthcare management.Janaína AlmeidaJanaína Almeida Ph.D. in Accounting, is a Professor of Accounting at the Federal University of Tocantins, Palmas, Brazil. Her research engages with business and accounting history.","PeriodicalId":45724,"journal":{"name":"Management & Organizational History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management & Organizational History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2023.2259878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper focuses on the management of Brazilian participation in the 1970 FIFA World Cup in Mexico. It analyzes discourses in the press to critically discuss how power relations were combined in the construction of a consensus around the participation in the 1970 Cup, drawing on concepts of symbolic forms, power and ideology. This cup motivated a series of dramatizations of the social world, revealing relationships, values and ideologies in force and latent. Strategies of symbolic construction made use of football (as a symbol of unity, identity and collective identification) and of traditional management tools such as accounting and calculative practices to rationalize discourses and legitimate power relations. Through a holistic approach, the study contributes to understand the use of football by dominant groups in shaping society. In the economic and financial dimension, the paper also provides insights into the constitutive role of accounting by showing its contribution to establish and sustain relations of domination, and into its interlinkages with a broader popular phenomenon – football.KEYWORDS: FootballBrazilpowerideologyWorld Cup Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available on the websites of the National Digital Library of Brazil, at the link Hemeroteca Digital at https://memoria.bn.br/hdb/periodico.aspx, O Globo (Acervo) at https://oglobo.globo.com/acervo/, and Estadão (Acervo) at the https://www.estadao.com.br/acervo/.Notes1. The World Cups of 1958 and 1962 were won in a democratic context, before the military dictatorship.2. This paper builds on a broad understanding of accounting (e.g. Burchell et al. Citation1980; Carnegie, Parker, and Tsahuridu Citation2021; Hopwood Citation1994) that embraces the social and organizational context and recognizes that accounting is not only a technical practice used to report on economic activities but also a social, moral and political one. While the technical practice of accounting (the measuring, recording, summarizing and communication of information for decision-making) is important, a broader understanding of accounting goes far beyond and provides answers to the following questions: ‘what does accounting do?’, ‘what are the impacts of accounting in the world?’ and, ‘what should accounting do (or not do)?’ (see Carnegie, Parker, and Tsahuridu Citation2021). Accordingly, this implies considering that accounting has a ‘productive force’ (Miller and Power Citation2013, 558), with the capacity to intervene and impact human behavior in organizational and public life (Burchell et al. Citation1980; Hopwood Citation1994).3. This magazine is available at: https://books.google.pt/books?id=id8N64KzeLEC&hl=pt-PT&source=gbs_all_issues_r&cad=14. Brazilian football was governed by the CBD, the National Sports Confederation, founded in the 1910s. In 1941, through the issue of the Decree-Law 3.199, of April 14, sports were officially acknowledged as important tools to control society and promote the national ideals of the Estado Novo in Brazil. This Decree-Law instituted CBD’s dependence on the National Sports Council linked to the Ministry of Education and Health.5. The central argument was that the altitude, in Mexico, would influence the competitors’ performance.6. The 1970 Brazilian team has been called the best of all time and materialized the Brazilian football art (Bellos Citation2002).7. Moreira Salles provided financial support to the Instituto de Pesquisas Sociais (Institute of Social Research), created to support the conspiracy that led to the military coup (Dreifuss Citation1981; Mayer, Citationn.d.). Former Brazilian ambassador in Washington (1952–1953; 1959–1961), the banker was among the Brazilians who provided information on João Goulart’s government to the American ambassador in Rio de Janeiro (Arquivos da ditadura Citationn.d.).8. UBB was established in 1967 as a result of the expansion of Banco Moreira Salles, which took advantage of the military dictatorship’s policy of banking centralization and absorbed other banks (Mayer, Citationn.d.).9. The cruzeiro (Cr$) was the monetary standard in Brazil from 1942 to 1967, 1970 to 1986 and 1990 to 1993. From 1967 to 1970, it was temporarily replaced by the new cruzeiro (NCr$).10. The Jules Rimet Trophy was the original prize for winning the FIFA World Cup. The winning of the 1970 Cup allowed Brazil to keep the real trophy in perpetuity, as stipulated by Jules Rimet in 1930.11. Alongside other multinational corporations operating in Brazil, Shell provided financial support to Instituto Brasileiro de Ação Democrática (IBAD) which acted as a conduit for multinational funds directed to IPES (Dreifuss Citation1981).12. The Maracanazo, deeply etched into football history, refers to Brazil’s defeat against Uruguay in the decisive match of the 1950 FIFA World Cup. This historic event took place at Rio de Janeiro’s Maracanã Stadium. The term encapsulates the profound shock and disbelief that swept over the Brazilian nation when Uruguay secured the victory. Brazil, as the host nation, held high hopes and an almost palpable sense of anticipation for a triumphant outcome. However, Uruguay’s unexpected 2–1 win shattered these expectations, leaving an enduring imprint on Brazil’s footballing legacy. The Maracanazo represents a pivotal moment that transcended mere sports. The profound sense of loss and the ensuing national identity crisis left an indelible mark on the writings of José Lins do Rego, Mário Filho and Nelson Rodrigues, collectively contributing to the understanding of the event’s lasting significance in Brazilian memory (Antunes Citation2004). Mario Filho, for example, chronicled the tragedy, describing the stunned silence that enveloped the stadium as Uruguay scored. He emphasized the profound impact of the defeat on the collective Brazilian psyche (e.g. Filho Citation1950). Nelson Rodrigues added a layer of theatricality and introspection to the event, exploring the psychological complexities of the Brazilian players, the expectations placed upon them, and the ultimate heartbreak that unfolded. His writings revealed the intertwining of sports and human emotion, using the Maracanazo as a canvas to explore deeper existential themes (e.g. Rodrigues Citation1993).13. This relates to the ‘mutt complex’, a term coined in 1958 by Nelson Rodrigues. The ‘mutt complex’ is the voluntary sense of inferiority that Brazilians impose upon themselves in comparison to the rest of the world, stemming from Brazil’s defeat in the 1950 World Cup final (Rodrigues Citation1993). To Rodrigues (Citation1993, 62), it is ‘a matter of self-belief. Brazilians need to convince themselves that they are not “mutts” and that they have football prowess to spare.’Additional informationNotes on contributorsLídia OliveiraLídia Oliveira Ph.D. in Business Administration, is a Professor of Accounting at the School of Economics and Management, University of Minho, Portugal. Her research engages with accounting and accountability, financial and non-financial reporting and corporate communication.Ana CariaAna Caria Ph.D. in Business Administration, is a Professor of Accounting at the School of Economics and Management, University of Minho, Portugal. Her research engages with accounting and accountability in diverse settings, with financial and sustainability reporting, corporate communication and accounting history.Helena Costa OliveiraHelena Costa Oliveira Ph.D. in Accounting, is a Professor of Accounting at the Porto Accounting and Business School, Polytechnic of Porto, Portugal. Her research engages with management accounting, institutional logics and healthcare management.Janaína AlmeidaJanaína Almeida Ph.D. in Accounting, is a Professor of Accounting at the Federal University of Tocantins, Palmas, Brazil. Her research engages with business and accounting history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理巴西参加1970年世界杯:为权力服务的意义
这一历史性事件在里约热内卢的Maracanã体育场举行。这个词概括了乌拉圭夺冠后巴西举国上下的震惊和难以置信。巴西作为主办国,对胜利的结果抱有很高的期望,几乎可以明显感受到这种期待。然而,乌拉圭队出人意料地以2比1获胜打破了这些期望,在巴西足球遗产上留下了持久的印记。马拉卡纳大道代表了一个超越单纯体育运动的关键时刻。深刻的失落感和随之而来的国家认同危机在joss<s:1> Lins do Rego, Mário Filho和Nelson Rodrigues的著作中留下了不可磨灭的印记,共同有助于理解这一事件在巴西记忆中的持久意义(Antunes Citation2004)。例如,马里奥·菲略(Mario Filho)记录了这场悲剧,描述了乌拉圭进球时,整个体育场陷入了震惊的沉默。他强调了失败对巴西集体精神的深刻影响(例如Filho Citation1950)。纳尔逊·罗德里格斯(Nelson Rodrigues)为这场比赛增添了一层戏剧性和自省的色彩,他探索了巴西球员心理的复杂性,人们对他们的期望,以及最终展现出来的心碎。他的作品揭示了体育与人类情感的交织,以马拉卡纳体育场为画布,探索更深层次的存在主义主题(如Rodrigues Citation1993)。这与“杂种情结”有关,这是Nelson Rodrigues在1958年创造的一个术语。“杂种情结”是巴西人强加给自己的一种与世界其他国家相比的自卑感,源于巴西在1950年世界杯决赛中的失败(Rodrigues Citation1993)。对于Rodrigues (citation1993,62)来说,这是一个“自信的问题”。巴西人需要说服自己,他们不是“杂种”,他们有足够的足球实力。关于contributorsLídia OliveiraLídia的说明Oliveira工商管理博士,葡萄牙米尼奥大学经济管理学院会计学教授。她的研究领域包括会计和问责制、财务和非财务报告以及企业沟通。Ana Caria,工商管理博士,葡萄牙米尼奥大学经济与管理学院会计学教授。她的研究涉及不同背景下的会计和问责制、财务和可持续发展报告、企业沟通和会计史。Helena Costa Oliveira,会计学博士,葡萄牙波尔图理工学院波尔图会计与商学院会计学教授。她的研究领域包括管理会计、机构逻辑和医疗保健管理。Janaína AlmeidaJanaína Almeida,会计学博士,巴西帕尔马斯托坎廷斯联邦大学会计学教授。她的研究涉及商业和会计史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Management & Organizational History (M&OH) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality, original, academic research concerning historical approaches to the study of management, organizations and organizing. The journal addresses issues from all areas of management, organization studies, and related fields. The unifying theme of M&OH is its historical orientation. The journal is both empirical and theoretical. It seeks to advance innovative historical methods. It facilitates interdisciplinary dialogue, especially between business and management history and organization theory. The ethos of M&OH is reflective, ethical, imaginative, critical, inter-disciplinary, and international, as well as historical in orientation.
期刊最新文献
Organizing Spanish-British mining companies: the case of “La Española”, 1866-1942 A non-conforming technocratic dream: Howard Scott’s technocracy movement Networks throughout an institutional transition: the case of the former Meliá touristic group (1932-1978) Form and media in management and organizational history how different research programs transform the ‘Past’ into ‘History’ Colonization and different types of institutional change: findings from an ex-British colony
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1