Barriers, promoters, and strategies for improving task shifting and task sharing implementation in Nigeria: qualitative perspectives of policymakers

Sunny C Okoroafor, Christmal Dela Christmals
{"title":"Barriers, promoters, and strategies for improving task shifting and task sharing implementation in Nigeria: qualitative perspectives of policymakers","authors":"Sunny C Okoroafor, Christmal Dela Christmals","doi":"10.29392/001c.88110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Nigeria developed a National Task Shifting and Sharing Policy due to protracted inequitable distribution of health workers, especially at the primary level of care, and the low stock and production rate of skilled health workforce. Following the development of Nigeria’s task shifting and sharing policy and strategy, implementation was promulgated at various levels, with States adopting and implementing the national policy. However, the policy environment for task shifting and sharing varies widely. Consequently, evidence on barriers to and factors promoting successful implementation are inconclusive. Hence, strategies for improving implementation are needed. The evidence from this study can inform the scale-up and strengthening of implementation approaches as Nigeria strives to achieve the national goals, universal health coverage and sustainable development goals. Methods An explorative, descriptive research study approach was applied with 20 key informant interviews conducted to explore the perception of policymakers on barriers and promoters of task shifting and sharing in Nigeria. In addition, strategies for improving task shifting and sharing implementation were explored. Results The barriers to effective implementation of task shifting ad sharing from our study were the persistent shortage of health workers, inter-cadre rivalry, perceived sub-optimal capacity of the beneficiary cadres, and lack of adequate equipment for delivery of needed services. The factors promoting the implementation of task shifting and sharing were the availability of adapted policies, the political will of the health sector leadership, acceptance of task shifting and sharing implementation by health workers, and the implementation of actions to improve knowledge and skills of health workers to implement shifted or shared tasks by various actors. The strategies to improve future task shifting and sharing implementation include improving staffing levels, scaling up training and periodic retraining, mentoring and supportive supervision, and improving the, use and dissemination of evidence generated. Conclusions Several factors influence the implementation of task shifting and sharing. Hence the identification and implementation of relevant strategies are pertinent in achieving set objectives and national goals. In policy and practice, therefore, a proactive exploration of the contextual understanding, barriers to implementation, enablers and learning from the performance of similar interventions is pertinent in shaping strategies for translating evidence to practice through an implementation framework. This should be done in collaboration with stakeholders to foster acceptance and participation.","PeriodicalId":73759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.88110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Nigeria developed a National Task Shifting and Sharing Policy due to protracted inequitable distribution of health workers, especially at the primary level of care, and the low stock and production rate of skilled health workforce. Following the development of Nigeria’s task shifting and sharing policy and strategy, implementation was promulgated at various levels, with States adopting and implementing the national policy. However, the policy environment for task shifting and sharing varies widely. Consequently, evidence on barriers to and factors promoting successful implementation are inconclusive. Hence, strategies for improving implementation are needed. The evidence from this study can inform the scale-up and strengthening of implementation approaches as Nigeria strives to achieve the national goals, universal health coverage and sustainable development goals. Methods An explorative, descriptive research study approach was applied with 20 key informant interviews conducted to explore the perception of policymakers on barriers and promoters of task shifting and sharing in Nigeria. In addition, strategies for improving task shifting and sharing implementation were explored. Results The barriers to effective implementation of task shifting ad sharing from our study were the persistent shortage of health workers, inter-cadre rivalry, perceived sub-optimal capacity of the beneficiary cadres, and lack of adequate equipment for delivery of needed services. The factors promoting the implementation of task shifting and sharing were the availability of adapted policies, the political will of the health sector leadership, acceptance of task shifting and sharing implementation by health workers, and the implementation of actions to improve knowledge and skills of health workers to implement shifted or shared tasks by various actors. The strategies to improve future task shifting and sharing implementation include improving staffing levels, scaling up training and periodic retraining, mentoring and supportive supervision, and improving the, use and dissemination of evidence generated. Conclusions Several factors influence the implementation of task shifting and sharing. Hence the identification and implementation of relevant strategies are pertinent in achieving set objectives and national goals. In policy and practice, therefore, a proactive exploration of the contextual understanding, barriers to implementation, enablers and learning from the performance of similar interventions is pertinent in shaping strategies for translating evidence to practice through an implementation framework. This should be done in collaboration with stakeholders to foster acceptance and participation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚改善任务转移和任务分担实施的障碍、促进因素和战略:政策制定者的定性观点
尼日利亚制定了一项国家任务转移和分担政策,原因是卫生工作者的分配长期不公平,特别是在初级保健一级,以及熟练卫生人力的库存和生产率低。在尼日利亚制定了任务转移和分担政策和战略之后,在各级颁布了执行工作,各国通过并执行了国家政策。然而,任务转移和共享的政策环境差异很大。因此,关于阻碍和促进成功实施的因素的证据尚无定论。因此,需要改进执行的战略。在尼日利亚努力实现国家目标、全民健康覆盖和可持续发展目标的过程中,这项研究的证据可以为扩大和加强执行方法提供信息。方法采用探索性、描述性研究方法,对20名关键信息提供者进行访谈,探讨尼日利亚政策制定者对任务转移和分担的障碍和促进因素的看法。此外,还探讨了改进任务转移和共享执行的策略。结果从我们的研究中发现,有效实施任务转移和分担的障碍是卫生工作者的持续短缺、干部之间的竞争、感知到的受益干部的次优能力以及缺乏足够的设备来提供所需的服务。促进执行任务转移和分担的因素是:可获得经过调整的政策、卫生部门领导层的政治意愿、卫生工作者接受任务转移和分担执行、以及采取行动提高卫生工作者的知识和技能,以执行各种行动者转移或分担的任务。改善未来任务转移和分享实施的战略包括提高人员配备水平、扩大培训和定期再培训、指导和支持性监督,以及改进所产生证据的使用和传播。结论影响任务转移与分担的因素有很多。因此,确定和执行有关战略对实现既定目标和国家目标是有意义的。因此,在政策和实践中,积极探索背景理解、实施障碍、推动因素和从类似干预措施的表现中学习,有助于制定战略,通过实施框架将证据转化为实践。这应与利益攸关方合作,促进接受和参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of Nigeria’s surgical plan: leveraging media engagement for cleft lip and palate to drive advocacy for access to surgical healthcare Digital health interventions in primary care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review protocol Developing conceptual framework and methodological considerations in community-supported chronic disease management Using spirometry for screening and diagnosis of chronic respiratory diseases in primary health care: findings from a community health project in rural India Maternal health in cities: analysis of institutional maternal mortality and health system bottlenecks in Kampala City Uganda, 2016-2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1