What is the right gentamicin dose for multiple trauma patients? A Monte Carlo simulation exploration study

Thitima Doungngern, MohammadYaseen Abbasi, Kamonthip Wiwattanawongsa, Weerachai Chaijamorn, Taniya Charoensareerat
{"title":"What is the right gentamicin dose for multiple trauma patients? A Monte Carlo simulation exploration study","authors":"Thitima Doungngern, MohammadYaseen Abbasi, Kamonthip Wiwattanawongsa, Weerachai Chaijamorn, Taniya Charoensareerat","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_14_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The appropriate dose of gentamicin is important to prevent and treat infections. The study aimed to determine the optimal dose of gentamicin to achieve the probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK) targets for efficacy and safety in multiple trauma patients. Methods: PK parameters of gentamicin in multiple trauma patients were gathered to develop a one-compartment PK model for prediction. The Monte Carlo simulation method was performed. The 24-h area under the concentration time curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC24h/MIC) ≥50 was defined for the infection prevention target. AUC24h/MIC ≥110 or the maximum serum concentration to MIC ratio ≥8–10 was for the treatment of serious Gram-negative infection target. The risk of nephrotoxicity was the minimum serum concentration ≥2 mg/L. The optimal dose of gentamicin was determined when the efficacy target was >90% and the risk of nephrotoxicity was lowest. Results: The optimal gentamicin dose to prevent infection when the MIC was <1 mg/L was 6–7 mg/kg/day. A higher dose of gentamicin up to 10 mg/kg/day could not reach the target for treating serious Gram-negative infection when the expected MIC was ≥1 mg/L. The probability of nephrotoxicity was minimal at 0.2–4% with gentamicin doses of 5–10 mg/kg/day for 3 days. Conclusions: Once daily gentamicin doses of 6–7 mg/kg are recommended to prevent infections in patients with multiple trauma. Gentamicin monotherapy could not be recommended for serious infections. Further clinical studies are required to confirm our results.","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_14_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The appropriate dose of gentamicin is important to prevent and treat infections. The study aimed to determine the optimal dose of gentamicin to achieve the probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK) targets for efficacy and safety in multiple trauma patients. Methods: PK parameters of gentamicin in multiple trauma patients were gathered to develop a one-compartment PK model for prediction. The Monte Carlo simulation method was performed. The 24-h area under the concentration time curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC24h/MIC) ≥50 was defined for the infection prevention target. AUC24h/MIC ≥110 or the maximum serum concentration to MIC ratio ≥8–10 was for the treatment of serious Gram-negative infection target. The risk of nephrotoxicity was the minimum serum concentration ≥2 mg/L. The optimal dose of gentamicin was determined when the efficacy target was >90% and the risk of nephrotoxicity was lowest. Results: The optimal gentamicin dose to prevent infection when the MIC was <1 mg/L was 6–7 mg/kg/day. A higher dose of gentamicin up to 10 mg/kg/day could not reach the target for treating serious Gram-negative infection when the expected MIC was ≥1 mg/L. The probability of nephrotoxicity was minimal at 0.2–4% with gentamicin doses of 5–10 mg/kg/day for 3 days. Conclusions: Once daily gentamicin doses of 6–7 mg/kg are recommended to prevent infections in patients with multiple trauma. Gentamicin monotherapy could not be recommended for serious infections. Further clinical studies are required to confirm our results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多重创伤患者正确的庆大霉素剂量是多少?蒙特卡罗模拟探索研究
背景:适当的庆大霉素剂量对预防和治疗感染具有重要意义。本研究旨在确定庆大霉素的最佳剂量,以实现多重创伤患者药代动力学/药效学(PK)目标的有效性和安全性的概率。方法:收集多例外伤患者庆大霉素的PK参数,建立单室PK模型进行预测。采用蒙特卡罗仿真方法。以浓度时间曲线下24h至最小抑制浓度比(AUC24h/MIC)≥50为感染预防靶点。AUC24h/MIC≥110或最大血药浓度与MIC之比≥8-10为治疗严重革兰氏阴性感染的靶标。最低血药浓度≥2 mg/L时出现肾毒性风险。庆大霉素的最佳剂量是在疗效指标为bb0 ~ 90%、肾毒性风险最低时确定的。结果:MIC <1 mg/L时庆大霉素预防感染的最佳剂量为6 ~ 7 mg/kg/d。当预期MIC≥1 mg/L时,再使用10 mg/kg/天的庆大霉素也不能达到治疗严重革兰氏阴性感染的目标。庆大霉素剂量为5-10 mg/kg/天,连续3天,肾毒性的可能性最小,为0.2-4%。结论:建议每日1次庆大霉素剂量为6 - 7mg /kg,以预防多发创伤患者感染。庆大霉素单药治疗不推荐用于严重感染。需要进一步的临床研究来证实我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
期刊最新文献
Effect of temperature and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass on cerebral saturation. Prospective observational study to measure the incidence of chest pain and its association with perioperative factors among parturients undergoing lower segment cesarean section with subarachnoid blocks. Response to: "Before attributing basilar artery aneurysm and pericardial tamponade to leptospirosis, alternative causes must be ruled out". Assessment of quality of life in follow-up patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: A prospective, observational study from a tertiary care center. Association of obesity and mortality in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1