The Association between Frailty Status and Blood Pressure Variability in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis

Ariani Intan Wardani, Aida Lydia, Kuntjoro Harimurti, Ikhwan Rinaldi, Pringgodigdo Nugroho, Arif Mansjoer, Sukamto Koesnoe, Hamzah Shatri
{"title":"The Association between Frailty Status and Blood Pressure Variability in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis","authors":"Ariani Intan Wardani, Aida Lydia, Kuntjoro Harimurti, Ikhwan Rinaldi, Pringgodigdo Nugroho, Arif Mansjoer, Sukamto Koesnoe, Hamzah Shatri","doi":"10.3889/oamjms.2023.11746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The high mortality rate of patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis (CKD-HD) is influenced by the high number of cardiovascular-induced death and blood pressure variability (BPV). AIM: The aim of this study is to understand the association between frailty status and intradialytic BPV. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study examining patients with CKD who underwent hemodialysis (HD) at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital from August to September 2022. BPV was calculated using the average real variability method and frailty status was assessed based on Frailty Index 40 Item. The association between frailty and systolic BPV was analyzed using the Chi-Square test, followed by logistic regression analysis to exclude the influence of the confounding variable. RESULTS: Out of 88 subjects recruited, 28.4% (95% CI: 18.98–37.82) were considered frail, 55.7% (95% CI: 45.32–66.08) were pre-frail, and 15.9% (95% CI: 8.26–23.54) were robust. The mean intradialytic BPV was 10.11 (8.60–13.35). It was found that the trend increased along with the rising frailty status, and the mean difference of intradialytic systolic BPV based on the results of Kruskal–Wallis testing had statistical significance. The result of the multivariate analysis revealed an increase in BPV prevalence in patients with pre-frailty (adjusted PR = 1.606, 95% CI: 0.681–3.787) and frailty (adjusted PR = 1.886 (95% CI: 0.783–4.545). CONCLUSION: Statistically, there is no association between frailty status and intradialytic BPV. However, clinically, a dose-response association was observed, indicating that the higher the frailty status, the higher the prevalence ratio for the occurrence of high BPV.","PeriodicalId":19562,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"193 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2023.11746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The high mortality rate of patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis (CKD-HD) is influenced by the high number of cardiovascular-induced death and blood pressure variability (BPV). AIM: The aim of this study is to understand the association between frailty status and intradialytic BPV. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study examining patients with CKD who underwent hemodialysis (HD) at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital from August to September 2022. BPV was calculated using the average real variability method and frailty status was assessed based on Frailty Index 40 Item. The association between frailty and systolic BPV was analyzed using the Chi-Square test, followed by logistic regression analysis to exclude the influence of the confounding variable. RESULTS: Out of 88 subjects recruited, 28.4% (95% CI: 18.98–37.82) were considered frail, 55.7% (95% CI: 45.32–66.08) were pre-frail, and 15.9% (95% CI: 8.26–23.54) were robust. The mean intradialytic BPV was 10.11 (8.60–13.35). It was found that the trend increased along with the rising frailty status, and the mean difference of intradialytic systolic BPV based on the results of Kruskal–Wallis testing had statistical significance. The result of the multivariate analysis revealed an increase in BPV prevalence in patients with pre-frailty (adjusted PR = 1.606, 95% CI: 0.681–3.787) and frailty (adjusted PR = 1.886 (95% CI: 0.783–4.545). CONCLUSION: Statistically, there is no association between frailty status and intradialytic BPV. However, clinically, a dose-response association was observed, indicating that the higher the frailty status, the higher the prevalence ratio for the occurrence of high BPV.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性肾脏病血液透析患者虚弱状态与血压变异性的关系
背景:接受血液透析(CKD-HD)的慢性肾病患者的高死亡率是由大量心血管死亡和血压变异性(BPV)影响的。目的:本研究的目的是了解虚弱状态与透析内BPV之间的关系。方法:这是一项横断面研究,研究了2022年8月至9月在Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo国立综合医院接受血液透析(HD)的CKD患者。BPV采用平均真实变率法计算,脆弱状态根据脆弱指数40项进行评估。虚弱和收缩期BPV之间的关系采用卡方检验进行分析,然后进行逻辑回归分析以排除混杂变量的影响。结果:在招募的88名受试者中,28.4% (95% CI: 18.98-37.82)为虚弱,55.7% (95% CI: 45.32-66.08)为虚弱前期,15.9% (95% CI: 8.26-23.54)为健壮。平均BPV为10.11(8.60-13.35)。结果发现,随着衰弱状态的升高,BPV呈上升趋势,基于Kruskal-Wallis检验结果的心衰期收缩期BPV均值差异有统计学意义。多因素分析结果显示,虚弱前(校正PR = 1.606, 95% CI: 0.681-3.787)和虚弱(校正PR = 1.886 (95% CI: 0.783-4.545)患者的BPV患病率增加。结论:从统计学上看,虚弱状态与血凝期BPV之间没有关联。然而,在临床上,观察到一种剂量-反应相关性,表明虚弱状态越高,高BPV的发生率越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1225
期刊介绍: Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences (OAMJMS) [formerly known as Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences] is a top-tier open access medical science journal published by the ID Design 2012/DOOEL Skopje, Rajko Zhinzifov No 48, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. OAMJMS is an international, modern, general medical journal covering all areas in the medical sciences, from basic studies to large clinical trials and cost-effectiveness analyses. We publish mostly human studies that substantially enhance our understanding of disease epidemiology, etiology, and physiology; the development of prognostic and diagnostic technologies; trials that test the efficacy of specific interventions and those that compare different treatments; and systematic reviews. We aim to promote translation of basic research into clinical investigation, and of clinical evidence into practice. We publish occasional studies in animal models when they report outstanding research findings that are highly clinically relevant. Our audience is the international medical community as well as educators, policy makers, patient advocacy groups, and interested members of the public around the world. OAMJMS is published quarterly online version. The Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences (OAMJMS) publishes Medical Informatics, Basic Science, Clinical Science, Case Report, Brief Communication, Public Health, Public Policy, and Review Article from all fields of medicine and related fields. This journal also publishes, continuously or occasionally, the bibliographies of the members of the Society, medical history, medical publications, thesis abstracts, book reviews, reports on meetings, i­n­formation on future meetings, important events and dates, and various headings which contribute to the development of the corresponding scientific field.
期刊最新文献
Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Workplace of Physiotherapists: Occupational Risk Factors and Their Role in Prevention and Management: A Systematic Review A Rare Case of Gastric Metastasis from a Rare Case of Mucosal Malignant Melanoma Studying the Specific (Adaptogenic and Anabolic) Activity of the Supramolecular Complex of 20-Hydroxyecdysone Triacetate with β-Cyclodextrin Herbal Bioactive Compounds for Skin Infections and Inflammatory Conditions Case Report: Is Intravenous Immunoglobulin Important when Used Together with Pulse Steroid! Complete recovery within 1 Month of Pediatric Patient Diagnosed with Transverse Myelitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1