{"title":"The Relationship Between the Number of Miscarriages and Diagnostic Parameters in Couples with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Evrim Ebru KOVALAK, Özlem KARABAY AKGÜL, Nurşen KURTOĞLU AKSOY, Neşe HAYIRLIOĞLU, Erdal KAYA","doi":"10.5336/jcog.2023-95397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the ovarian reserve tests and abnormal test results in couples with 2 to more than 2 recurrent pregnancy losses in our population. Material and Methods: Seventy-five couples aged 20-44 years, who had two or more consecutive abortions at 20 weeks or less from the last menstrual period, were included in the study. The women were divided into two groups as those who had two miscarriages (Group 1, n=34) and those who had three or more miscarriages (Group 2, n=41). Women in both groups were compared in terms of serum hormone levels, biochemical parameters, karyotype analysis, thrombophilic, and uterine factors. The spermiogram values and karyotype analyzes of the male partners in both groups were compared. Results: The women in Group 2 were older than those in Group 1, and live birth history and Factor V Leiden heterozygosity were found to be statistically significantly higher. The follicle stimulating hormone values in the secondary recurrent pregnancy loss patients were found to be statistically significantly higher than in the primary recurrent pregnancy loss patients. Conclusion: Maternal age and Factor V Leiden heterozygosity may be associated with the number of miscarriages in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss.","PeriodicalId":36268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5336/jcog.2023-95397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the ovarian reserve tests and abnormal test results in couples with 2 to more than 2 recurrent pregnancy losses in our population. Material and Methods: Seventy-five couples aged 20-44 years, who had two or more consecutive abortions at 20 weeks or less from the last menstrual period, were included in the study. The women were divided into two groups as those who had two miscarriages (Group 1, n=34) and those who had three or more miscarriages (Group 2, n=41). Women in both groups were compared in terms of serum hormone levels, biochemical parameters, karyotype analysis, thrombophilic, and uterine factors. The spermiogram values and karyotype analyzes of the male partners in both groups were compared. Results: The women in Group 2 were older than those in Group 1, and live birth history and Factor V Leiden heterozygosity were found to be statistically significantly higher. The follicle stimulating hormone values in the secondary recurrent pregnancy loss patients were found to be statistically significantly higher than in the primary recurrent pregnancy loss patients. Conclusion: Maternal age and Factor V Leiden heterozygosity may be associated with the number of miscarriages in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss.
目的:本研究的目的是比较2次或2次以上复发妊娠失败夫妇的卵巢储备检查和异常检查结果。材料与方法:研究对象为75对年龄在20-44岁之间,在最后一次月经后20周或更短时间内连续两次或两次以上流产的夫妇。这些妇女被分为两组,一组有过两次流产(第1组,n=34),另一组有过三次以上流产(第2组,n=41)。两组妇女在血清激素水平、生化参数、核型分析、血栓形成和子宫因素方面进行比较。比较两组男性伴侣的精子图值和核型分析。结果:2组妇女年龄大于1组,活产史和Factor V Leiden杂合性均有统计学意义。继发性复发性妊娠丢失患者的促卵泡激素值明显高于原发性复发性妊娠丢失患者。结论:母亲年龄和Leiden因子V杂合性可能与反复流产夫妇的流产次数有关。