The Predictive Values of Ductus Venosus Pulsatility Index and ''A Wave'' for Chromosomal Abnormalities

IF 0.1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5336/jcog.2023-96258
Şafak YILMAZ BARAN, Başar ÖNAL, Murat YAYLA
{"title":"The Predictive Values of Ductus Venosus Pulsatility Index and ''A Wave'' for Chromosomal Abnormalities","authors":"Şafak YILMAZ BARAN, Başar ÖNAL, Murat YAYLA","doi":"10.5336/jcog.2023-96258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To establish a reference range for fetal ductus venosus pulsatility index for veins (DV PIV) and investigate the efficacy of the abnormal ductus venosus (DV) Doppler assessment to diagnose the chromosomal abnormalities of the fetus during first-trimester screening. Material and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated a total of 3,243 singleton pregnancies at 11+0 to 13+6 weeks of gestation in a 12-year period and assigned the patients into 2 groups to compare the efficacy of DV PIV in predicting chromosome abnormalities. The first group consisted of pregnancies involving fetuses with chromosomal abnormalities and the second group consisted of uncomplicated singleton fetuses with available DV Doppler measurements. We determined a cut-off value for DV PIV measurements to predict chromosomal abnormalities, and analyzed the relationship between chromosome abnormalities, and abnormal DV Doppler measurements. Results: A total of 644 fetuses (104 fetuses with an abnormal karyotype (pregnancies involving fetuses with chromosomal abnormalities) and 540 fetuses phenotypically normal or euploid in neonates after birth (pregnancies with normal fetuses) met the study criteria. The 5th and 95th percentiles of DV PIV were 0.78 and 1.21 in pregnancies with normal fetuses. We calculated with 63.6% sensitivity and 60.3% specificity, (95% confidence interval 0.72-0.83) for DV PIV to diagnose chromosomal abnormalities. Abnormal DV blood flow was related to all trisomies. The lowest DV PIV was observed in cases with trisomy 21, while the highest DV PIV values were found in cases with trisomy 18 and 13 in the abnormal karyotype group. Conclusion: Routinely monitoring DIV PIV as a first-trimester screening tool may be beneficial to predict fetal chromosomal abnormalities.","PeriodicalId":36268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5336/jcog.2023-96258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To establish a reference range for fetal ductus venosus pulsatility index for veins (DV PIV) and investigate the efficacy of the abnormal ductus venosus (DV) Doppler assessment to diagnose the chromosomal abnormalities of the fetus during first-trimester screening. Material and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated a total of 3,243 singleton pregnancies at 11+0 to 13+6 weeks of gestation in a 12-year period and assigned the patients into 2 groups to compare the efficacy of DV PIV in predicting chromosome abnormalities. The first group consisted of pregnancies involving fetuses with chromosomal abnormalities and the second group consisted of uncomplicated singleton fetuses with available DV Doppler measurements. We determined a cut-off value for DV PIV measurements to predict chromosomal abnormalities, and analyzed the relationship between chromosome abnormalities, and abnormal DV Doppler measurements. Results: A total of 644 fetuses (104 fetuses with an abnormal karyotype (pregnancies involving fetuses with chromosomal abnormalities) and 540 fetuses phenotypically normal or euploid in neonates after birth (pregnancies with normal fetuses) met the study criteria. The 5th and 95th percentiles of DV PIV were 0.78 and 1.21 in pregnancies with normal fetuses. We calculated with 63.6% sensitivity and 60.3% specificity, (95% confidence interval 0.72-0.83) for DV PIV to diagnose chromosomal abnormalities. Abnormal DV blood flow was related to all trisomies. The lowest DV PIV was observed in cases with trisomy 21, while the highest DV PIV values were found in cases with trisomy 18 and 13 in the abnormal karyotype group. Conclusion: Routinely monitoring DIV PIV as a first-trimester screening tool may be beneficial to predict fetal chromosomal abnormalities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉导管搏动指数和“A波”对染色体异常的预测价值
目的:建立胎儿静脉导管搏动指数(DV PIV)的参考范围,探讨异常静脉导管(DV)多普勒评估在早期妊娠筛查中诊断胎儿染色体异常的价值。材料和方法:我们回顾性评估了12年期间共3243例妊娠11+0至13+6周的单胎妊娠,并将患者分为两组,比较DV - PIV在预测染色体异常方面的疗效。第一组包括有染色体异常胎儿的妊娠,第二组包括有可用的DV多普勒测量的无并发症的单胎胎儿。我们确定了DV - PIV测量的临界值来预测染色体异常,并分析了染色体异常与DV -多普勒测量异常之间的关系。结果:644例胎儿(核型异常胎儿104例(染色体异常胎儿妊娠)和540例新生儿表型正常或整倍体(正常胎儿妊娠)符合研究标准。正常胎妊娠的第5和第95百分位DV PIV分别为0.78和1.21。我们计算出DV - PIV诊断染色体异常的敏感性为63.6%,特异性为60.3%(95%可信区间为0.72-0.83)。DV血流量异常与所有三体有关。在异常核型组中,21三体的DV PIV值最低,18和13三体的DV PIV值最高。结论:常规监测DIV PIV作为妊娠早期筛查工具可能有助于预测胎儿染色体异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Management of Congenital Cervical Teratoma with Application of EXIT Protocol - Case Report Reverse Breech Extraction versus Vaginal Push before Uterine Incision during Cesarean Section with Fully Dilated Cervix and Impacted Fetal Head Postdate Pregnancy Maternal and Fetal Outcomes among Sudanese Women Age as a Predictor of Time to Response for Patients Undergoing Medical Management of Endometrial Cancer Ectopic Pregnancy Risk Factors Presentation and Management Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1