Consumers’ perceptions of animal husbandry practices and their heterogeneous needs for information – insights from a cross-country cluster analysis

Corinna Hempel, Megan Waldrop, Jutta Roosen
{"title":"Consumers’ perceptions of animal husbandry practices and their heterogeneous needs for information – insights from a cross-country cluster analysis","authors":"Corinna Hempel, Megan Waldrop, Jutta Roosen","doi":"10.22434/ifamr2022.0139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The growing complexity of value chains leads to an increasing distance between consumers and producers. In anonymized markets, product labels are used to decrease the information asymmetry between producers and consumers, as they replace any form of direct communication. In the context of animal husbandry, we reveal how the distance between consumers and producers is related to consumers’ perceptions of animal welfare and elaborate on the role of knowledge, information, and product labels. A quantitative online survey on consumers’ perceptions of and attitudes towards animal welfare (AW) was carried out in Austria, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Sweden. Data was analyzed using principal component and cluster analysis, yielding four consumer segments, namely the pragmatists, the AW unconcerned, the indifferent, and the AW concerned. The results indicate that the more contact consumers have with producers/farmers, the higher is consumers’ subjective knowledge of animal husbandry systems and the lower is the need for additional information on animal welfare through a label. Further research is needed to investigate the relation between subjective and objective knowledge, animal welfare concern, and consumers’ alienation from food production places and practices.","PeriodicalId":101231,"journal":{"name":"The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr2022.0139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The growing complexity of value chains leads to an increasing distance between consumers and producers. In anonymized markets, product labels are used to decrease the information asymmetry between producers and consumers, as they replace any form of direct communication. In the context of animal husbandry, we reveal how the distance between consumers and producers is related to consumers’ perceptions of animal welfare and elaborate on the role of knowledge, information, and product labels. A quantitative online survey on consumers’ perceptions of and attitudes towards animal welfare (AW) was carried out in Austria, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Sweden. Data was analyzed using principal component and cluster analysis, yielding four consumer segments, namely the pragmatists, the AW unconcerned, the indifferent, and the AW concerned. The results indicate that the more contact consumers have with producers/farmers, the higher is consumers’ subjective knowledge of animal husbandry systems and the lower is the need for additional information on animal welfare through a label. Further research is needed to investigate the relation between subjective and objective knowledge, animal welfare concern, and consumers’ alienation from food production places and practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费者对畜牧业实践的看法及其对信息的异质需求——来自跨国聚类分析的见解
价值链的日益复杂导致消费者和生产者之间的距离越来越远。在匿名市场中,产品标签取代了任何形式的直接沟通,从而减少了生产者和消费者之间的信息不对称。在畜牧业的背景下,我们揭示了消费者与生产者之间的距离如何与消费者对动物福利的看法相关,并详细说明了知识、信息和产品标签的作用。在奥地利、德国、意大利、荷兰、挪威、斯洛伐克、斯洛文尼亚和瑞典开展了一项关于消费者对动物福利(AW)的看法和态度的定量在线调查。使用主成分和聚类分析对数据进行了分析,得出了四个消费者群体,即实用主义者、不关心的、无所谓的和关心的。结果表明,消费者与生产者/农民的接触越多,消费者对畜牧业系统的主观知识就越高,通过标签获取动物福利额外信息的需求就越低。主观知识与客观知识、动物福利关注、消费者与食品生产场所和实践的异化之间的关系有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The influence of internal factors on micro and small enterprises performance: evidence from Tanzanian agri-food processors Unraveling agricultural cooperatives’ performance measurement: a literature review Optimising the power of core resources used in Taiwanese controlled-environment mushroom industry business strategies through strategic alliances China’s Land Reform and Rural Innovation: A Case Study Digital technologies as a driver of resilience and institutional transformation: The case of Ukrainian agroholdings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1