The Evolving Role of History in the Past, Present, and Future of Psychedelic Patenting

Shahin Shams, Amanda Rose Pratt, Sisi Li, Tom Isenbarger
{"title":"The Evolving Role of History in the Past, Present, and Future of Psychedelic Patenting","authors":"Shahin Shams, Amanda Rose Pratt, Sisi Li, Tom Isenbarger","doi":"10.3368/hopp.65.1.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> The resurgence of mainstream psychedelic research has spurred a capitalist interest in patenting to exclude competitors from producing, using, or selling psychedelic technology. Some exploit the patenting process to monopolize well-established psychedelic knowledge with overly broad claims. If patent examiners find evidence, known as “prior art,” showing that what is claimed is known, patent rights are not granted. Historical psychedelic prior art therefore plays a critical role in shaping the future of patent law in the context of psychedelic capitalism. Given that some psychedelic prior art exists in nontraditional forms, patent examiners may not be able to identify relevant prior art to nullify overly broad claims. Consequently, several psychedelic patents have erroneously been granted. Organizations and intellectual property activists leverage direct methods of introducing historical psychedelic prior art to fight these overly broad patents and applications on a claim-by-claim basis with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Valuable historical archival psychedelic prior art is likewise curated and made available to patent examiners and innovators through the work of the online psychedelic prior art library Porta Sophia and its broad interdisciplinary network of experts. The psychedelic field is at a critical developmental juncture, and it is essential that all involved work to ensure that its landscape remains equitable, research can flourish, and vulnerable communities with strong cultural connections to psychedelics are protected.","PeriodicalId":13221,"journal":{"name":"History of Pharmacy and Pharmaceuticals","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Pharmacy and Pharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/hopp.65.1.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The resurgence of mainstream psychedelic research has spurred a capitalist interest in patenting to exclude competitors from producing, using, or selling psychedelic technology. Some exploit the patenting process to monopolize well-established psychedelic knowledge with overly broad claims. If patent examiners find evidence, known as “prior art,” showing that what is claimed is known, patent rights are not granted. Historical psychedelic prior art therefore plays a critical role in shaping the future of patent law in the context of psychedelic capitalism. Given that some psychedelic prior art exists in nontraditional forms, patent examiners may not be able to identify relevant prior art to nullify overly broad claims. Consequently, several psychedelic patents have erroneously been granted. Organizations and intellectual property activists leverage direct methods of introducing historical psychedelic prior art to fight these overly broad patents and applications on a claim-by-claim basis with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Valuable historical archival psychedelic prior art is likewise curated and made available to patent examiners and innovators through the work of the online psychedelic prior art library Porta Sophia and its broad interdisciplinary network of experts. The psychedelic field is at a critical developmental juncture, and it is essential that all involved work to ensure that its landscape remains equitable, research can flourish, and vulnerable communities with strong cultural connections to psychedelics are protected.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史在迷幻药专利的过去、现在和未来中不断演变的作用
主流迷幻药研究的复苏刺激了资本主义对专利的兴趣,以排除竞争对手生产、使用或销售迷幻药技术。一些人利用专利程序,以过于宽泛的权利要求垄断公认的迷幻药知识。如果专利审查员发现证据,即所谓的“现有技术”,表明所要求的内容是已知的,则不授予专利权。因此,在迷幻资本主义的背景下,历史迷幻现有技术在塑造专利法的未来方面起着至关重要的作用。鉴于一些迷幻的现有技术以非传统的形式存在,专利审查员可能无法识别相关的现有技术,从而使过于宽泛的权利要求无效。因此,一些迷幻药专利被错误地授予。组织和知识产权活动家利用引入历史上的迷幻药现有技术的直接方法,与美国专利商标局(U.S. Patent and Trademark Office)进行逐项索赔,以对抗这些过于宽泛的专利和申请。同样,通过在线迷幻药现有技术图书馆Porta Sophia及其广泛的跨学科专家网络的工作,迷幻药现有技术的宝贵历史档案也被整理并提供给专利审查员和创新者。致幻剂领域正处于一个关键的发展节点,所有相关人员都必须努力确保其景观保持公平,研究能够蓬勃发展,并且与致幻剂有着强烈文化联系的弱势群体得到保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Special Issue Introduction Alisha Rankin,The Poison Trials: Wonder Drugs, Experiment, and the Battle for Authority in Renaissance Science “Utterly Impossible” Plants into Pills Ido Hartogsohn,American Trip: Set, Setting, and the Psychedelic Experience in the Twentieth Century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1