How are accountability and organisational learning related? A study of German bilateral development cooperation

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1177/13563890231204661
Daniel E. Esser, Heiner Janus
{"title":"How are accountability and organisational learning related? A study of German bilateral development cooperation","authors":"Daniel E. Esser, Heiner Janus","doi":"10.1177/13563890231204661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyse qualitative data collected from employees at Germany’s two main international development organisations, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) and Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW) Development Bank, to study how upward accountability and organisational learning interact in the world’s second largest foreign aid system. Goffman’s ‘staging’ heuristic is applied to unpack social practices in these two organisations. We find that employees navigate two separate domains, a frontstage and a backstage. They consider the federal bureaucracy an audience expecting a coherent storyline despite the messy realities of foreign aid. In response, they engage in impression management on a frontstage while shielding their backstages from scrutiny to maximise autonomy. As a result, organisational learning at GIZ and KfW in Goffman’s terms focuses on collective efficacy at satisfying accountability expectations through staged performances. We relate these insights to the hierarchical structure of Germany’s foreign aid system, the role of organisational interests and prevailing professional norms.","PeriodicalId":47511,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890231204661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We analyse qualitative data collected from employees at Germany’s two main international development organisations, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) and Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW) Development Bank, to study how upward accountability and organisational learning interact in the world’s second largest foreign aid system. Goffman’s ‘staging’ heuristic is applied to unpack social practices in these two organisations. We find that employees navigate two separate domains, a frontstage and a backstage. They consider the federal bureaucracy an audience expecting a coherent storyline despite the messy realities of foreign aid. In response, they engage in impression management on a frontstage while shielding their backstages from scrutiny to maximise autonomy. As a result, organisational learning at GIZ and KfW in Goffman’s terms focuses on collective efficacy at satisfying accountability expectations through staged performances. We relate these insights to the hierarchical structure of Germany’s foreign aid system, the role of organisational interests and prevailing professional norms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
问责制和组织学习是如何关联的?德国双边发展合作研究
我们分析了从德国两家主要的国际发展组织——德国国际合作机构(GIZ)和德国复兴信贷银行(KfW)开发银行——员工那里收集的定性数据,以研究在世界第二大外援体系中,向上问责制和组织学习是如何相互作用的。戈夫曼的“分期”启发式被应用于这两个组织的社会实践。我们发现员工在两个不同的领域中穿行,一个是前台,一个是后台。他们认为,尽管外国援助的现实很混乱,但联邦官僚机构是一群期待连贯故事情节的观众。作为回应,他们在前台进行印象管理,同时保护后台不受审查,以最大限度地提高自主权。因此,用戈夫曼的话说,德国国际合作机构和德国复兴信贷银行的组织学习侧重于通过阶段性表现满足问责期望的集体效能。我们将这些见解与德国对外援助体系的等级结构、组织利益的作用和普遍的专业规范联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation
Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Using co-creation to address monitoring and evaluation challenges: The experience of South Africa’s evaluation hackathon What role should we play to be effective evaluators? – practitioner reflections Principles and methods to advance value for money Evaluating site selection at design in food systems interventions: A formative geospatial approach What works in democracy support? How to fill evidence and usability gaps through evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1